Amalia, F. R., Ibnu, S., Widarti, H. R., & Wuni, H. (2018). Students’ mental models of acid and base concepts taught using the cognitive apprenticeship learning model. Indonesian Journal of Science Education/Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14264

Aminudin, A. H., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Samsudin, A., Costu, B., & Adimayuda, R. (2019). Rasch analysis of multitier open-ended light-wave instrument (MOLWI): Developing and assessing second-years sundanese-scholars alternative conceptions. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.574524

Boone, W. J., & Noltemeyer, A. (2017). Rasch analysis: A primer for school psychology researchers and practitioners. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1416898

Buber, A., & Coban, G. U. (2017). The effects of learning activities based on argumentation on conceptual understanding of 7th graders about “force and motion” unit and establishing thinking friendly classroom environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.367

Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000276712

Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners’ mental models of chemical bonding. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013159927352

Costu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2010). Promoting conceptual change in first year students’ understanding of evaporation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1039/c001041n

Didis, N., EryIlmaz, A., & Erkoc, S. (2014). Investigating students’ mental models about the quantization of light, energy, and angular momentum. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020127

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Ebersbach, M., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Knowledge on accelerated motion as measured by implicit and explicit tasks in 5 to 16 year olds. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9208-5

Fratiwi, N. J., Samsudin, A., & Costu, B. (2018). Enhancing K-10 students’ conceptions through computer simulations-aided PDEODE*E (CS-PDEODE*E) on Newton’s Laws. Indonesian Journal of Science Education/ Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14229

Fratiwi, N. J., Utari, S., & Samsudin, A. (2019). Study of concept mastery of binocular K-11 students through the implementation of A multi-representative approach. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(8), 1637–1642.

Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289976

Hess, A. K. N., & Greer, K. (2016). Designing for engagement: Using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacy course. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.27

Irwansyah, I., Sukarmin, S., & Harjana, H. (2018). Development of three-tier diagnostics instruments on students misconception test in fluid concept. Al-Biruni Journal of Physics Education/ Jurnal Ilmiah pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2703

Itza-Ortiz, S. F., Rebello, S., & Zollman, D. (2004). Students’ models of Newton’s second law in mechanics and electromagnetism. European Journal of Physics, 25(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/25/1/011

Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03802-160146

Kaltakci, D., & Didis, N. (2007). Identification of pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions on gravity concept: A study with a 3-tier misconception test. AIP Conference Proceedings, 499–500. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2733255

Kaniawati, I., Fratiwi, N. J., Danawan, A., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2019). Analyzing students’ misconceptions about Newton’s laws through four-tier Newtonian test (FTNT). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10269a

Kurnaz, M. A., & Eksi, C. (2015). An analysis of high school students’ mental models of solid friction in physics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(3), 787–795. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.3.2526

Kurniawan, Y., Muliyani, R., & Nassim, S. (2019). Digital story conceptual change oriented (DSCC) to reduce students’ misconceptions in physics. Al-Biruni Journal of Physics Education/ Jurnal Ilmiah pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 8(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v0i0.4596

Latifah, S., Irwandani, I., Saregar, A., Diani, R., Fiani, O., Widayanti, W., & Deta, U. A. (2019). How the Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) learning strategy remediates students’ misconception on Temperature and Heat materials? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012051

Lestari, P., Ristanto, R. H., & Miarsyah, M. (2019). Analysis of conceptual understanding of botany and metacognitive skill in pre-service biology teacher in Indonesia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.515978

Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2016). Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 19–29.

Maharani, L., Rahayu, D.I., Amaliah, E., Rahayu, R., Saregar, A. (2019). Diagnostic test with four-tier in physics learning: Case of misconception in newton's law material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012022

Moutinho, S., Moura, R., & Vasconcelos, C. (2016). Mental models about seismic effects: students’ profile based comparative analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9572-7

Mulhall, P., & Gunstone, R. (2012). Views about learning physics held by physics teachers with differing approaches to teaching physics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 38, 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9291-2

Ozcan, O. (2013). Fizik Ogretmeni Adaylarinin spin kavramina yonelik zihinsel modellerinin arastirilmasi [Investigation of mental models of turkish pre-service physics students for the concept of “spin”]. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 21–36.

Ozcan, O. (2015). Investigating students’ mental models about the nature of light in different contexts. European Journal of Physics, 36(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/6/065042

Ozcan, O., & Bezen, S. (2016). Students’ mental models about the relationship between force and velo city concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(5), 630–641.

Putranta, H., & Supahar. (2019). Development of physics-tier tests (PysTT) to measure students’ conceptual understanding and creative thinking skills: A qualitative synthesis. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 647–775. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.587203

Rasch, G. (1960). Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. In Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.

Rook, L. (2013). Mental models: A robust definition. Learning Organization, 20(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471311288519

Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The Effectiveness of STEM-based on gender differences: The Impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753

Saglam-Arslan, A., & Devecioglu, Y. (2010). Student teachers’ levels of understanding and model of understanding about Newton’s laws of motion. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–20.

Saǧlam-Arslan, A., & Kurnaz, M. A. (2009). Prospective physics teachers’ level of understanding energy, power and force concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1–18.

Samsudin, A., Fratiwi, N. J., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Hermita, N., Suhandi, A., & Supriyatman, S. (2017). Alleviating students’ misconceptions about newton’s first law through comparing Pdeode*e tasks and POE tasks: Which is more effective?. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, (Special Issue for INTE 2017), 215–221.

Samsudin, Achmad, Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kaniawati, I. (2016). Preliminary design of ici-based multimedia for reconceptualizing electric conceptions at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 739, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/739/1/012006

Saputra, O., Setiawan, A., & Rusdiana, D. (2019). Identification of student misconception about static fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032069

Stains, M., & Sevian, H. (2015). Uncovering implicit assumptions: A large-scale study on students’ mental models of diffusion. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9450-x

Tortop, H. S. (2012). Awareness and misconceptions of high school students about renewable energy resources and applications: Turkey case. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1829–1840.

Urey, M. (2018). Defining the relationship between the perceptions and the misconceptions about photosynthesis topic of the preservice science teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.813

Wang, C. Y., & Barrow, L. H. (2011). Characteristics and levels of sophistication: An analysis of chemistry students’ ability to think with mental models. Research in Science Education, 41(4), 561–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9180-7

Widyastuti, E., & Susiana. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to develop learning material for actuarial mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(45), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052

Yuberti, Y., Latifah, S., Anugrah, A., Saregar, A., Misbah, M., Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Approaching problem-solving skills of momentum and impulse phenomena using context and problem-based learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1217–1227. https://doi.org/ 10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1217