Research Article
Motivation and Learning Strategies: Student Motivation Affects Student Learning Strategies

Hasan Hariri , Dedy Hermanto Karwan, Een Yayah Haenilah, Riswanti Rini, Ujang Suparman

9215 4635

Article Metrics

Views

 

9215

Downloads

 

4635

Citations

Crossref

0

Scopus

13


Hariri H, Karwan DH, Haenilah EY, Rini R, Suparman U. Motivation and learning strategies: student motivation affects student learning strategies . European J Ed Res. 2021;10(1):39-49. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.39
Hariri, H., Karwan, D. H., Haenilah, E. Y., Rini, R., & Suparman, U. (2021). Motivation and learning strategies: student motivation affects student learning strategies . European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.39
Hariri Hasan, Dedy Hermanto Karwan, Een Yayah Haenilah, Riswanti Rini, and Ujang Suparman. "Motivation and Learning Strategies: Student Motivation Affects Student Learning Strategies ," European Journal of Educational Research 10, no. 1 (2021): 39-49. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.39
Hariri, H Karwan, DH Haenilah, EY Rini, R & Suparman, 2021, 'Motivation and learning strategies: student motivation affects student learning strategies ', European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39-49. Hariri, Hasan et al. "Motivation and Learning Strategies: Student Motivation Affects Student Learning Strategies." European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021, pp. 39-49, https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.39.

Abstract

Despite being a popular research subject internationally, self-regulated learning is relatively under-investigated in the Indonesian context. This article examined student learning motivation and its use as an indicator to predict student learning strategies in an Indonesian school context. This article applied quantitative research design, with Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) used to collect the data. This questionnaire was completed by 408 public high secondary students randomly selected from the population in Lampung Province schools, and multiple regression was used to analyze the obtained data. Results show that student motivation and learning strategies were positively and significantly correlated; three predictor variables of student motivation could significantly predict learning strategies; and value components of student motivation best predicted learning strategies. In conclusion, these findings indicate that, when teachers apply learning strategies, such variables as motivation including value, expectancy, and affective components should be strongly considered to be in place. It is hoped finally that the students will be self-regulated learners for their success.

Keywords: Learning strategies, metacognition, motivation, self-regulated learning, student.


References

Adesola, S. A., & Li, Y. (2018). The relationship between self-regulation, self-efficacy, test anxiety and motivation. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(10), 759-763.

Banisaeid, M., & Huang, J. (2015). The role of motivation in self-regulated learning and language learning strategy. In the case of Chinese EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(5), 36-43.

Cazan, A.-M. (2013). Teaching self-regulated learning strategies for psychology students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 743-747.

Chang, A. S. C., & Smith, I. D. (1998, December 3-5). Self-regulated learning of Singapore students [Paper presentation]. The 1998 Educational Research Association Conference, Singapore. 

Chou, M.-H. (2019). Predicting self-efficacy in test preparation: Gender, value, anxiety, test performance, and strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(1), 61-71.

Cleary, T. J., & Platten, P. (2013). Examining the correspondence between self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A case study analysis. Education Research International, 2013, 1-18.   https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/272560

Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88-108.

Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 337-346.

de Bruin, A. B., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. (2011). Generating keywords improves meta comprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 294-310.          

Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101-129.

Dirjendikdasmen. (2017). Data pokok pendidikan dasar dan menengah [Main data of basic and secondary education]. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Directorate General of Basic and Secondary Education, Ministry of Education and Culture].   http://dapo.dikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/sp/1/120000.

Garcia, T. D., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128.

Garrido-Vargas, M. (2012). Relationship of self-regulated learning and academic achievement among English language learners [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Arizona.

Ginsberg, M. B., & Wlodkowski, R. J. (2019). Intrinsic motivation as the foundation for culturally responsive social-emotional and academic learning in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 46(4), 53-66.

Hardy, D. L. (2013). Learning Strategies and Motivational Patterns, as Measured by the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, Among Students Pursuing Nursing and Allied Health Careers [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Akron.

Hariri, H., Haenilah, E. Y., Rini, R., & Karwan, D. H. (2018, November 13 – 14). Pengaruh motivasi intrinsik dan ekstrinsik siswa terhadap efikasi diri siswa: Studi pada SMPN di Provinsi Lampung [Effects of students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on students' self-efficacy: Study at Public Junior High Schools in Lampung Province] [Paper Presentation]. Dissemination of Research Results in Supporting Sustainable Development, Lampung, Indonesia.

Hariri, H., Monypenny, R., & Prideaux, M. (2012). Principalship in an Indonesian school context: Can principal decision-making styles significantly predict teacher job satisfaction? School Leadership & Management, 32(5), 453-471.

Hariri, H., Monypenny, R., & Prideaux, M. (2014). Leadership styles and decision-making styles in an Indonesian school context. School Leadership & Management, 34(3), 284-298.

Hariri, H., Monypenny, R., & Prideaux, M. (2016). Teacher-perceived principal leadership styles, decision-making styles and job satisfaction: how congruent are data from Indonesia with the Anglophile and Western literature? School Leadership & Management,  36(1), 41-62

Harris, K. R., Friedlander, B. D., Saddler, B., Frizzelle, R., & Graham, S. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. The Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 145-157.

Holland, D. F., Kraha, A., Zientek, L. R., Nimon, K., Fulmore, J. A., Johnson, U. Y., Ponce, H. F., Aguilar, M. G.,  & Henson, R. K. (2018). Reliability generalization of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: a meta-analytic view of reliability estimates. SAGE Open, 8(3), 1-28.

Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350-374.

Jo, I.-H., Park, Y., Yoon, M., & Sung, H. (2016). Evaluation of online log variables that estimate learners’ time management in a Korean online learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1), 195-213.

Kadhiravan, S., & Suresh, V. (2008). Self-regulated behaviour at work. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 34 (Special Issue), 126-131.

Kayacan, K., & Sonmez Ektem, I. (2019). The effects of biology laboratory practices supported with self-regulated learning strategies on students' self-directed learning readiness and their attitudes towards science experiments. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 313-299.

Kosnin, A. M. (2007). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement in Malaysian undergraduates. International Education Journal, 8(1), 221-228.

Montalvo, F. T., & Torres, M. C. G. (2004). Self-regulated learning: Current and future directions. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1), 1-34.

Neville, V. M., & Bennett, S. (2004). Using self-regulated learning to manage the discomfort of becoming fluent with information technology.  Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part A. 4743. University of Wollongong. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5770&context=eispapers.

Ng, B., Wang, C. J., & Liu, W. C. (2017). Self-regulated learning in Singaporean context: a congeneric approach of confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(1), 91-107.  

Nownaisin, P., Koul, R., Chomsuwan, K., Poondej, C., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2020).   Linking social relatedness with motivational goals and bachelor degree aspirations of vocational students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1581-1589.

Oflaz, A. (2019). The effects of anxiety, shyness and language learning strategies on speaking skills and academic achievement. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 999-1011.

Ozan, C., Gundogdu, K., Bay, E., & Celkan, H. Y. (2012). A study on the university students’ self-regulated learning strategies skills and self-efficacy perceptions in terms of different variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1806-1811.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In P. R. P. M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press.

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 385-407.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33–40.         

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. D., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.  https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED338122.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. D., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813.

Roick, J., & Ringeisen, T. (2017). Self-efficacy, test anxiety, and academic success: A longitudinal validation. International Journal of Educational Research, 83(1), 84-93.

Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Edovald, T., & Õun, K. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Estonian version of MSLQ. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 597-604.                

Schunk, D. H. (2005). Commentary on self-regulation in school contexts. Learning and Instruction, 15(2), 173-177.        

Şen, Ş., Yilmaz, A., & Yurdugul, H. (2014). An Evaluation of the Pattern between Students’ Motivation, Learning Strategies and Their Epistemological Beliefs: The Mediator Role of Motivation. Science Education International, 24(3), 312-331.

Smith, S. (2013). Determining sample size: How to ensure you get the correct sample size. Qualtrics. https://qualtrics.com/blog/determining-sample-size/

Steffens, K. (2006). Self‐regulated learning in technology‐enhanced learning environments: Lessons of a European peer review. European Journal of Education, 41(3‐4), 353-379.        

Taherdoost, H. (2017). Determining sample size: How to calculate survey sample size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 237-239.

Tanriseven, I. (2014). A Tool that can be effective in the self-regulated learning of pre-service teachers: The mind map. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 65-80.

Taylor, R. T. (2012). Review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) using reliability generalization techniques to assess scale reliability [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Auburn University.            

Tohir, M., Maswar, M., Atikurrahman, M., Saiful, S., & Pradita, D. A. R. (2020). Prospective teachers' expectations of students' mathematical thinking processes in solving problems.  European Journal of Educational Research9(4), 1735-1748.

Tsemrekal, T. M. (2013). The relationship between parenting style, self-regulated learning and academic achievement in selected primary schools in Ethiopia [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation], University of South Africa.

Turingan, J. P., & Yang, Y.-C. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of self-regulated learning skills between Korean and Filipino college students. Asian Social Science, 5(12), 3-10.

Ulstad, S. O., Halvari, H., Sørebø, Ø., & Deci, E. L. (2016). Motivation, learning strategies, and performance in physical education at secondary school. Advances in Physical Education, 6(01), 27-41.

Vrieling, E., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2012). Effects of increased self-regulated learning opportunities on student teachers' motivation and use of metacognitive skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 37(8), 102-117.

Wang, C., Schwab, G., Fenn, P., & Chang, M. (2013). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies for English language learners: Comparison between Chinese and German college students. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 173-191.     

White, G., Cordato, D., O’Rourke, F., Mendis, R., Ghia, D., & Chan, D. (2012). Validation of the stroke rehabilitation motivation scale: a pilot study. The Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 7(2), 80-87.              

Wolters, C. A. (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 265-283.

Xu, M. (2008). The relation between parental involvement, self-regulated learning and reading achievement of fifth graders: A path analysis using the ECLS-K database  [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Akron.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307-313.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 145-155.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290.

Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom: A review of the literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC), Virginia Commonwealth University. http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/merc_pubs/18