logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is a leading, peer-reviewed research journal that provides an online forum for studies in education by and for scholars and practitioners worldwide.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Research Article

Synergy of Voluntary GenAI Adoption in Flexible Learning Environments: Exploring Facets of Student-Teacher Interaction Through Structural Equation Modeling

Alfeo B. Tulang

Integrating generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education has gained significant attention, particularly in flexible learning environments (.


  • Pub. date: July 15, 2025
  • Online Pub. date: May 29, 2025
  • Pages: 829-845
  • 98 Downloads
  • 589 Views
  • 0 Citations

How to Cite

Abstract:

I

Integrating generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education has gained significant attention, particularly in flexible learning environments (FLE). This study investigates how students’ voluntary adoption of GenAI influences their perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), learning engagement (LE), and student-teacher interaction (STI). This study employed a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach, using data from 480 students across multiple academic levels. The findings confirm that voluntary GenAI adoption significantly enhances PU and PEU, reinforcing established technology acceptance models (TAM). However, PU did not directly impact LE at the latent level—an unexpected finding that underscores students’ engagement’s complex and multidimensional nature in AI-enriched settings. Conversely, PEU positively influenced LE, which in turn significantly predicted STI. These findings suggest that usability, rather than perceived utility alone, drives deeper engagement and interaction in autonomous learning contexts. This research advances existing knowledge of GenAI adoption by proposing a structural model that integrates voluntary use, learner engagement, and teacher presence. Future research should incorporate variables such as digital literacy, self-regulation, and trust and apply longitudinal approaches to better understand the evolving role of GenAI inequitable, human-centered education.

Keywords: Flexible learning environments, generative artificial intelligence adoption, structural equation modeling, student-teacher interaction, technology acceptance.

description PDF
file_save XML
Article Metrics
Views
98
Download
589
Citations
Crossref
0

Scopus
0

References

Abdalla, A. A., Bhat, M. A., Tiwari, C. K., Khan, S. T., & Wedajo, A. D. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT adoption among business and management students through the lens of diffusion of innovation theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100257

Akanzire, B. N., Nyaaba, M., & Nabang, M. (2025). Generative AI in teacher education: Teacher educators’ perception and preparedness. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(1), Article ep2508. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/15887

Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2, 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

Akyürek, E. (2019). Impacts of using technology on teacher-student communication/interaction: Improve students learning. World of Journal of Education, 9(4), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n4p30

Alhumaid, K., Al Naqbi, S., Elsori, D., & Al Mansoori, M. (2023). The adoption of artificial intelligence applications in education. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 457-466. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.8.013

Al-Momani, A. M., & Ramayah, T. (2024). Adoption of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. In M. A. Al-Sahafi, M. Al-Emran, G. W.-H., & K.-B. Ooi, Current and Future Trends on Intelligent Technology Adoption (Vol. 2 pp. 117-135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61463-7_7

Arbuckle, J. L. (2019). IBM® SPSS® Amos™26 user’s guide. IBM. https://bit.ly/44TAWmx

Bancoro, J. C. (2024). Exploring the influence of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on technology engagement of business administration instructors. International Journal of Asian Business and Management, 3(2), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijabm.v3i2.8714

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.  

Batista, J., Mesquita, A., & Carnaz, G. (2024). Generative AI and higher education: Trends, challenges, and future directions from a systematic literature review. Information15(11), Article 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110676

Bhatt, P., & Muduli, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in learning and development: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development. 47(7/8),677-694. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-09-2021-0143

Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001

Bognár, L., & Khine, M. S. (2025). The shifting landscape of student engagement: A pre-post semester analysis in AI-enhanced classrooms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100395

Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education39(4), 568-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041

Bond, M., & Bergdahl, N. (2022). Student engagement in open, distance, and digital education. In O. Zawacki-Richter, & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_79-1

Breukelman, M., Gosen, M. N., Koole, T., & van de Pol, J. (2023). The workings of multiple principles in student-teacher interactions: Orientations to both mundane interaction and pedagogical context. Linguistics and Education76, Article 101188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101188

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219

Chai, C. S., Lin, P.-Y., Jong, M. S.-Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology and Society, 24(3), 89-101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032858

Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2024). Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, Article 101395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.stueduc.2024.101395

Chang, W.-L., & Sun, J. C.-Y. (2024). Evaluating AI's impact on self-regulated language learning: A systematic review. System, 126, Article 103484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103484

Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021). Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change170, Article 120880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880

Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2002). Flexible learning in a digital world. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning17(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051022000048228

Data Privacy Act, 10173. (2012). https://privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act/

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information System Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008  

Diwan, C., Srinivasa, S., Suri, G., Agarwal, S., & Ram, P. (2023). AI-based learning content generation and learning pathway augmentation to increase learner engagement. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence4, Article 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100110

Eager, B., & Brunton, R. (2023). Prompting higher education towards AI-augmented teaching and learning practice. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice20(5), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.02

Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning management system adoption in higher education using the extended technology acceptance model. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education, 8(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.05

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313

Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. Rogers, G. Berg, J., Boettcher, C, Howard, L. Justice, & K. Scheck (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (2nd ed., pp. 352-355). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch052

Gumbs, A. A., Perretta, S., d’Allemagne, B., & Chouillard, E. (2021). What is artificial intelligence surgery? Artificial. Intelligence Surgery1, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.20517/ais.2021.01

Gunness, A., Matanda, M. J., & Rajaguru, R. (2023). Effect of student responsiveness to instructional innovation on student engagement in semi-synchronous online learning environments: The mediating role of personal technological innovativeness and perceived usefulness. Computers and Education, 205, Article 104884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104884

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult., G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM) using R (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hanham, J., Lee, C. B., & Teo, T. (2021). The influence of technology acceptance, academic self-efficacy, and gender on academic achievement through online tutoring. Computers and Education, 172, Article 104252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104252

Henrie, C. R., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K. C., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning16(3), 131-151. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2015

Herlambang, A. D., & Rachmadi, A. (2024). Student's perception of technology-rich classrooms usage to support conceptual and procedural knowledge delivery in higher education computer science course. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 1500-1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.151

Holstein, K., & Aleven, V. (2022). Designing for human-AI complementarity in K-12 education. AI Magazine43(2), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12058

Holstein, K., Hong, G., Tegene, M., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2018). The classroom as a dashboard: Co-designing wearable cognitive augmentation for K-12 teachers. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’18) (pp. 79-88). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170377

How flexible is flexible learning, who is to decide and what are its implications? [Editorial]. (2017). Distance Education, 38(3), 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1371831

Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Huang, J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). Examining the relationship between the L2 motivational self-system and technology acceptance model post ChatGPT introduction and utilization. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence7, Article 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100302

Jose, E. M. K., Prasanna, A., Kushwaha, B. P., & Das, M. (2024). Can generative AI motivate management students? The role of perceived value and information literacy. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), Article 101082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101082

Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197

Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817

Katona, J., & Gyonyoru, K. I. K. (2025). Integrating AI-based adaptive learning into flipped classroom model to enhance engagement and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100392

Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics77, Article 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925

Kennedy, I. (2022). Sample size determination in test-retest and Cronbach alpha reliability estimates. British Journal of Contemporary Education2(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9

Kong, S. C., Yang, Y., & Hou, C. (2024). Examining teachers’ behavioral intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328

Kourkouli, K. (2024). Unlocking in-depth forum discussion and perceived effectiveness: Teaching and social presence categories in online teacher communities. Teaching and Teacher Education146, Article 104630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104630

Kreijns, K., Xu, K., & Weidlich, J. (2022). Social presence: Conceptualization and measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 139-170. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09623-8

Kustova, T., Vodneva, A., Tcepelevich, M., Tkachenko, I., Oreshina, G., Zhukova, M. A., Golovanova, I., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2025). Psychophysiological correlates of learner-instructor interaction: A scoping review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 211, Article 112556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112556

Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence6, Article 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221

Li, L., & Yang, S. (2021). Exploring the influence of teacher-student interaction on university students’ self-efficacy in the flipped classroom. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n2p84

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. International Journal of Management Education21(2), Article 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

Lyu, W., & Salam, Z. A. (2025). AI-powered personalized learning: Enhancing self-efficacy, motivation, and digital literacy in adult education through expectancy-value theory. Learning and Motivation, 90, Article 102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102129

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika57(3), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI Magazine27(4), 12-14. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904

Menzli, L. J., Smirani, L. K., Boulahia, J. A., & Hadjouni, M. (2022). Investigation of open educational resources adoption in higher education using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory. Heliyon, 8(7), Article e09885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09885

Mertler, C. A., Vannatta, R. A., & LaVenia, K. N. (2021). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003047223

Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Moravec, V., Hynek, V., Gavurova, B., & Rigelsky, M. (2024). Who uses it and for what purpose? The role of digital literacy in ChatGPT adoption and utilization. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(4), Article 100602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100602

Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, Article 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394

Neo, M., Lee, C. P., Tan, H. Y.-J., Neo, T. K., Tan, Y. X., Mahendru, N., & Ismat, Z. (2022). Enhancing students’ online learning experiences with artificial intelligence (AI): The MERLIN project. International Journal of Technology, 13(5), 1023-1034. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i5.5843

Neuhüttler, J., Fischer, R., Ganz, W., & Urmetzer, F. (2020). Perceived quality of artificial intelligence in smart service systems: A structured approach. In M. Shepperd, F. Brito e Abreu, A. R. da Silva, & R. Pérez-Castillo (Eds.), Quality of information and communications technology (pp. 3-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_1

Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies28, 4221-4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w

Noor, N., Rao Hill, S. R., & Troshani, I. (2021). Recasting service quality for AI-based service. Australasian Marketing Journal, 30(4), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/18393349211005056

Okulich-Kazarin, V., Artyukhov, A., Skowron, Ł., Artyukhova, N., Dluhopolskyi, O., & Cwynar, W. (2024). Sustainability of higher education: Study of student opinions about the possibility of replacing teachers with AI technologies. Sustainability16(1), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010055

Ortiz-López, A., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & Sánchez-Prieto, J. C. (2025). Mobile-based assessment acceptance: A systematic literature review in the educational context. International Journal of Educational Research, 130, Article 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102551

Pang, C., Wang, Z. C., McGrenere, J., Leung, R., Dai, J., & Moffatt, K. (2021). Technology adoption and learning preferences for older adults: Evolving perceptions, ongoing challenges, and emerging design opportunities. In CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 490). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445702

Patnaik, P., & Bakkar, M. (2024). Exploring determinants influencing artificial intelligence adoption, reference to diffusion of innovation theory. Technology in Society, 79, Article 102750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102750

Pesovski, I., Santos, R., Henriques, R., & Trajkovik, V. (2024). Generative AI for customizable learning experiences. Sustainability16(7), Article 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073034

Raj, N. S., & Renumol, V. G. (2022). A systematic literature review on adaptive content recommenders in personalized learning environments from 2015 to 2020. Journal of Computers in Education, 9, 113-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00199-4

Rangel-de Lázaro, G., & Duart, J. M. (2023). You can handle, you can teach it: Systematic review on the use of extended reality and artificial intelligence technologies for online higher education. Sustainability, 15(4), Article 3507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043507

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.  

Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2005). A statistically justified pairwise ML method for incomplete nonnormal data: A comparison with direct ML and pairwise ADF. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(2), 183-214. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1202_1

Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner-instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9

Shah, B. A., Zala, L. B., & Desai, N. A. (2023). Structural equation modelling for segmentation analysis of latent variables responsible for environment-friendly feeder mode choice. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 12(1), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.01.003

Sharma, P., & Harkishan, M. (2022). Designing an intelligent tutoring system for computer programing in the Pacific. Educational and Information Technologies, 27, 6197-6209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10882-9

Shirkhani, S., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Barriers to self-regulation of language learning: Drawing on Bandura's ideas. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.213

Simms, R. C. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in nursing education: A crucial call to action. Nurse Education Today146, Article 106544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106544

Sun, H.-L., Sun, T., Sha, F.-Y., Gu, X.-Y., Hou, X.-R., Zhu, F.-Y., & Fang, P.-T. (2022). The influence of teacher-student interaction on the effects of online learning: Based on a serial mediating model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 779217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779217

Tawil, S., & Miao, F. (2024). Steering the digital transformation of education: UNESCO’s human-centered approach. Frontiers in Digital Education, 1, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0020-0

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities' policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326

Watson, J., Valsesia, F., & Segal, S. (2024). Assessing AI receptivity through a persuasion knowledge lens. Current Opinion in Psychology, 58, Article 101834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101834

Wong, W. K. O. (2024). The sudden disruptive rise of generative artificial intelligence? An evaluation of their impact on higher education and the global workplace. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity10(2), Article 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100278

Yang, H. (2025). Harnessing generative AI: Exploring its impact on cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, learning retention, reward sensitivity, and motivation through reinforcement theory. Learning and Motivation, 90, Article 102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102136

...