logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
higher education analytical thinking debates reshaping the curriculum

Enhancing Analytical Thinking in Tertiary Students Using Debates

Anastasiya M. Spaska , Viktoriia M. Savishchenko , Olha A. Komar , Tetiana Ya. Нritchenko , Olena V. Maidanyk

The purpose of the study was to identify how debates effected the analytical thinking abilities of tertiary students and how the debates as an instruc.

T

The purpose of the study was to identify how debates effected the analytical thinking abilities of tertiary students and how the debates as an instructional approach were perceived by the students. The study used quantitative data collection methods such as tests and observation checklists and qualitative data collection methods such as a focus group discussion. The data was yielded from the measurements of students’ analytical thinking, critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and decision-making skills. The pretest and posttest measurements were administered using the test of analytical skills, the quiz entitled “Get Ready to Test Your Analytical Skills!”, and the problem-solving test. The study found that the debates improve the students’ analytical thinking abilities and are perceived positively by them. The pretest and posttest measurements results, observation reports, and a focus group discussion showed that the debate-driven instructional model brought positive change to students’ analytical thinking, critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and decision-making skills which are supported by the statistically significant Mean differences in all the variables. The findings from observations implied that the lessons were organised in a way that could sufficiently challenge the students, engage them in the search of information, and presenting their findings based on the facts and statistics. The results obtained from the students’ responses in the outline focus group discussion found that the students appreciated participation in the debates as they associated the experience with job benefits, the practical value of the debates, learning engagement, and research.

Keywords: Higher education, analytical thinking, debates, reshaping the curriculum.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
696
Download
770
Citations
Crossref
9

Scopus
8

References

3SmartCubes. (2020). Test of analytical skills. https://www.3smartcubes.com/pages/tests/analytical-skills-test/analytical-skills-test_instructions/

American Parliamentary Debate Association. (2020). Guide to APDA & FAQs. https://apda.online/about/guide-to-apda/

Abernathy, C., & Forestal, J. (2019). The use of debates in political science courses. Journal of Political Science Education, 1(13), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2019.1656082

Ang, R. X., Chew, Q. H., Sum, M. Y., Sengupta, S., & Sim, K. (2019). A systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education - does it work? GMS Journal for Medical Education, 36(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001245

Astafieva, M. M., Bodnenko, D. M., & Proshkin, V. V. (2019). Using computer-oriented Geometry means in the process of critical thinking formation of future Mathematics teachers. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 71(3), 102-121. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v71i3.2449

Bacikova, Z. (2018). The role of a debate in the development of critical thinking. In D. Petranová & S. Magál (Eds.), Proceedings to the International Scientific Conference (pp. 18-37). University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius.

Bobrytska, V., Luzik, E., Reva, T., Spitsin, Y., & Akmaldinova, V. (2020). Involving stakeholders in shaping educational legislation and policy in Ukraine. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1189-1200. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1189

Brownson, C. (2013). Classroom participation and knowledge gain. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(18), 78-83.

Wilson, M., & Brown, Z. (2016). The complexity of in-class debates in Higher Education: student perspectives on differing designs. Educational futures: E-journal of the British Education Studies Association, 7(2), 14-28.

ProProfs Quizzes. (2020). Get ready to test your analytical skills! https://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/story.php?title=analytical-skills

Chicago State University. (2020). Analytical thinking: Definition. https://cutt.ly/hcrvc3j

Critical Thinking Secrets. (2020). Critical thinking vs Analytical thinking. https://criticalthinkingsecrets.com/critical-thinking-vs-analytical-thinking/

Doody, O., & Condon, M. (2012). Increasing student involvement and learning through using debate as an assessment. Nurse education in practice, 12(4), 232-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.03.002

Gooblar, D. (2016). Skills first, and let content follow. The Chronicle Vitae. https://chroniclevitae.com/news/1551-skills-first-and-let-content-follow

Hanacek, J. (2010). Phases of the research process. Comenius University.

Irwanto, I. (2018). Integrated measurement of students' analytical thinking skills and science process skills. In D. E. Irawan, S. Viridi, E. Mulyana & L. M. Nurani (Eds.), Proceedings of International Seminar on Science Education: Harmonisation of Science, Technology, and Society in Science Learning to Prepare 21st century Generation (pp. 217-225). INA-Rxiv Papers. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/6qyhd

Montanes, N., Lascano, D., Quiles-Carrillo, L., Torres-Giner, S., & Rayón, E. (2020). Ethical dilemmas and debates as teaching methodologies to develop critical thinking competence. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), Proceedings for 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 5339-5343). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.1441

Najafi, M., Motaghi, Z., Nasrabadi, H. B., & Heshi, K. N. (2016). “Debate” learning method and its implications for the formal education system. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(6), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2015.2316

Nurakhir, A., Nindya Palupi, F., Langeveld, C., & Nurmalia, D. (2020). Students’ views of classroom debates as a strategy to enhance critical thinking and oral communication skills. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 10(2), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v10i2.29864

Nureldeen, W. (2020). Using classroom debates to develop EFL students’ pragmatic competence and critical thinking. International Journal of Language Academy, 8(4), 90-109. https://doi.org/10.29228/ijla.44227

Price, P., Jhangiani, R., & Chiang, I. (2015). Research methods in psychology2nd Canadian edition. BCcampus. https://opentextbc.ca/researchmethods/

Robb, L. (2015). Strategies to improve students’ analytical thinking. EDUblog. https://edublog.scholastic.com/post/strategies-improve-students-analytical-thinking

Sadler, T. D. (2010). Debates in the classroom. In C. S. Clauss-Ehlers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural School Psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71799-9_125

Sartika, S. B. (2017). Teaching models to increase students’ analytical thinking skills. In T. W. Abadi, N. E. T. I. Santosa, M. T. Multazam, F. Megawati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intellectuals' Global Responsibility (pp. 216-218). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.52

Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Cologne Journal of Sociology and Social Psychology/ Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologieund Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

Soliman, A. M. (2014). The problem-solving inventory: Appraisal of problem-solving in the Arab context, factor structure, and validation. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 3(4), 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000020

Toner, P., & Woolley, R. (2016). Perspectives and debates on vocational education and training, skills, and the prospects for innovation. Spanish Journal of Sociology/ Revista Española de Sociología, 25(3), 319-342.

Trujillo-Jenks, L., & Rosen, L. (2015). Fostering student learning through the use of debates. Faculty Focus. https://cutt.ly/wcv8erw

Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 561-596. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21082

Williams-Brown, Z. (2015). The use of in-class debates as a teaching strategy in increasing students’ critical thinking and collaborative learning skills in higher education. Educational futures: E-journal of the British Education Studies Association, 7(1), 39-55.

Xi, X., & Sawaki, Y. (2016). Methods of Test Validation. In E. Shohamy, I. Or, & S. May (Eds.), Language Testing and Assessment. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd ed.) (pp. 193-209). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02326-7_14-1

Yulina, I. K., Permanasari, A., Hernani, H., & Setiawan, W. (2019). Analytical thinking skill profile and perception of pre-service chemistry teachers in analytical chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042046

...