logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
co creation factor analysis multivariate analysis questionnaire university students

Multivariate Analysis of Co-creation Activities in University Education

Eirini Vardakosta , Georgios Priniotakis , Michail Papoutsidakis , Marisa Sigala , Dimitrios Nikolopoulos

This paper investigates the viewpoints and perspectives of 179 undergraduate students engaged in a co-creation project regarding their anticipated pro.

T

This paper investigates the viewpoints and perspectives of 179 undergraduate students engaged in a co-creation project regarding their anticipated progress, exploring, simultaneously, the affecting factors. The students attended the physics course in the Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering at the University of West Attica, Greece. The investigation is implemented through a questionnaire that appraises the students' co-creation expectations in association with collected demographic data via twenty-two close-ended questions (Q1-Q22). Several statistical data sets are presented, including descriptive and correlation statistics and principal component and exploratory factor analyses. The majority of the replies are provided by male participants in their first year of study, with an average age of between 18 and 19. The correlation coefficient between the questions ranges from -.04 to.73, with the maximum occurring between the questions Q19 and Q20. Factor analysis justified by KMO (.862) and Bartlett’s sphericity (1749.843, p= .000) tests indicates five principal components within the following factors determining the undergraduate co-creation activities: responsible behaviour, feedback, helping, tolerance, and personal interaction. The above findings may contribute to the implementation of students’ co-creation as they are valuable tools for the design and pre-requisites for a successful implementation.

Keywords: Co-creation, factor analysis, multivariate analysis, questionnaire, university students.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
224
Download
224
Citations
Crossref
2

Scopus
2

References

Barnard, M., & Stoll, Ν. (2010). Organisational change management: A rapid literature review. Centre for Understanding Behaviour Change.

Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The effect of standardization on a Chi-square approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38(3-4), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.337    

Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2016). Co-creating curriculum in higher education: Promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120734 

Bettencourt, L. (1997). Customer voluntary performance: Customers as partners in service delivery. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90024-5

Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.770264

Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w

Bovill, C., Aitken, G., Hutchison, J., Morrison, F., Roseweir, K., Scott, A., & Sotannde, S. (2010). Experiences of learning through collaborative evaluation from a postgraduate certificate in professional education. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 143-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601441003738343

Brown, R. (2007). The market’ and institutional change. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 11(2), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603100701258941

Chathoth, P., Altinay, L., Harrington, R. J., Okumus, F., & Chan, E. S. W. (2013). Co-production versus co-creation: A process based continuum in the hotel service context. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.03.009

Clothier, A., & Matheson, D. (2019). Using co-creation as a pedagogic method for the professional development of students undertaking a BA (Hons) in education studies. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(6), 826–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1409344

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in teaching and learning: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Czepiel, J. (1990). Service encounters and service relationships: Implications for research. Journal of Business Research, 20(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90038-F

Dandridge, N. (2019). The office for students: Reflections on our first year. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 23(4), 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2019.1591538

Deeley, S. J. (2014). Summative co-assessment: Α deep learning approach to enhancing employability skills and attributes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514649

Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551

De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education?: Α case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500046255

Ennew, C., & Binks, M. (1999). Impact of participative service relationships on quality, satisfaction and retention: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 46(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00016-2

Farquharson, L., Sinha, T., & Clarke, S. (2018). Researching organisational change in higher education: A holistic tripartite approach. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 16(3), 150–161. https://bit.ly/3M3evQs     

Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408177

Groth, M., Mertens, D., & Murphy, R. (2004). Customers as good soldiers: Extending organizational citizenship behavior research to the customer domain. In D. Turnipseed (Ed.), Handbook of organizational citizenship behavior (pp.415–433). Nova Science Publishers.

Herbst, M. (1999). Change management: A classification. Tertiary Education and Management, 5(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.1999.9966986

Kaiser, H., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001316447403400115

Karahan, E., Bozan, M. A., & Akçay, A. O. (2022). The analysis of prospective counselors’ instructional designs to develop critical thinking skills. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 58(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1994973

Kelley, S., Donnelly, J., & Skinner, S. (1990). Customer participation in service production and delivery. Journal of Retailing, 66(3), 315–335.

Kellogg, D., Youngdahl, W., & Bowen, D. (1997). On the relationship between customer participation and satisfaction: Two frameworks. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239710185406

Lengnick-Hall, C., Claycomb, V., & Inks, L. (2000). From recipient to contributor: Examining customer roles and experienced outcomes. European Journal of Marketing, 34(3/4), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010311902  

Martusewicz, R. (2013). When the political gets personal: Social foundations and university politics in hard times. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 49(6), 481-484.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2013.846595 

McRoy, I., & Gibbs, P. (2009). Leading change in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(5), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209339655   

McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802176147 

O’Hern, M. S., & Rindfleisch, A. (2010). Customer co-creation: A typology and research agenda. In N. K. Malhotra (Ed.), Review of marketing research (Vol. 6, pp.84–106). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1548-6435(2009)0000006008 

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249

Riva, E., Gracia, L., & Limb, R. (2022). Using co-creation to facilitate PhD supervisory relationships, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(7), 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.2021158

Rogers, C., & Freiberg, J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Merrill.

Rosenbaum, M., & Massiah, C. (2007). When customers receive support from other customers: Exploring the influence of intercustomer social support on customer voluntary performance. Journal of Service Research, 9(3), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670506295851  

Sutarso, Y., Halim, R. E., Balqiah, T. E., & Tjiptoherijanto, P. (2019). Understanding customer co-creation activities in higher education: Groupings, characteristics and implications. International Journal of Business and Society, 20(1), 42–56. https://bit.ly/3dtMKDM

Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279-1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.026

...