logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
cognitive style creativity impulsive information literacy reflective

Optimizing the Creativity of Reflective and Impulsive Students through Writing Articles Based on Information Literacy

Imas Cintamulya , Lilik Mawartiningsih , Warli Warli

Creativity and information literacy are skills necessary for students for task completion in the learning process. One of the tasks assigned to studen.

C

Creativity and information literacy are skills necessary for students for task completion in the learning process. One of the tasks assigned to students in learning is to write drafts of scientific articles. Furthermore, teachers must pay attention to cognitive styles in the learning process. This study aimed to describe students' creativity in writing drafts of scientific papers based on information literacy concerning reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. This research was exploratory qualitative research to explain the creativity of reflective and impulsive students in writing scientific article drafts based on information literacy. The research subjects comprised two students for each reflective and impulsive cognitive style. The cognitive style was measured using the Matching Familiar Figure Test instrument. Students' creativity was measured using a test with fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration indicators. The results indicated that reflective students were highly creative in writing drafts of scientific articles. Meanwhile, impulsive students were relatively creative in the same activity. In conclusion, students possessing the reflective cognitive style are more creative than students following the impulsive cognitive style in writing drafts of scientific articles based on information literacy. We recommend that writing articles based on information literacy is required to increase HOTs (Higher Order Thinking Skills).

Keywords: Cognitive style, creativity, impulsive, information literacy, reflective.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
283
Download
367
Citations
Crossref
0

Scopus
0

References

Aktamis, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2008). The effect of scientific process skills education on students’ scientific creativity, science attitudes, and academic achievements. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), Article 4. https://bit.ly/3LM0UOC

Almeida, L. S., Prieto, L. P., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance test of creative thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003

Arsad, N. M., Osman, K., & Soh, T. M. T. (2011). Instrument development for 21st-century skills in biology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1470–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.312

Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80. https://bit.ly/3Vqt3y7

Cho, J. Y. (2017). An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.006

Clark, M. R. (2018). Fostering creative thinking and reflexive evaluation in searching: Instructional scaffolding and the zone of proximal development in information literacy acquisition. In M.K. Oberlies & J.L. Mattson (Ed.), Framing information literacy: Teaching grounded in theory, pedagogy, and practice (pp. 285–298). ACRL.

Çoklar, A. N., Yaman, N. D., & Yurdakul, I. K. (2017). Information literacy and digital nativity as determinants of online information search strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.050

Council, N. R. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.

Creswell, J. (2015). Riset pendidikan: Perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan evaluasi riset kualitatif & kuantitatif [Educational research: Planning, implementation and evaluation of qualitative & quantitative research] (5th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Daud, A. M., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2012). Creativity in science education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302

de Casterlé, B. D., Gastmans, C., Bryon, E., & Denier, Y. (2012). QUAGOL: A guide for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(3), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012

Dubicki, E. (2015). Writing a research paper: Students explain their process. Reference Services Review, 43(4), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2015-0036

Ecarnot, F., Seronde, M.-F., Chopard, R., Schiele, F., & Meneveau, N. (2015). Writing a scientific article: A step-by-step guide for beginners. European Geriatric Medicine, 6(6), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2015.08.005

Ernawati, M. D. W., Sudarmin, Asrial, Damris, M., Haryanto, Nevriansyah, E., Fitriani, R., & Putri, W. A. (2022). How scaffolding integrated with problem based learning can improve creative thinking in chemistry? European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1349–1361. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1349

Fatt., J. P. T. (2000). Understanding the learning styles of students: Implications for educators. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy; Bingley, 20(11/12), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330010789269

Grant, M. J. (2013). What makes a good title? Health Information & Libraries Journal, 30(4), 259–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12049

Gregory, E., Hardiman, M., Yarmolinskaya, J., Rinne, L., & Limb, C. (2013). Building creative thinking in the classroom: From research to practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.06.003

Harsiati, T., Pradana, I. M. P., & Amrullah, H. (2019). Information literacy and self-regulation in the context of the creative thinking of prospective engineers. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 17(2), 197–203. http://bitly.ws/DnKY

Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st-century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, Article 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286

Herring, J. E. (2010). Improving students’ web use and information literacy: A guide for teachers and teacher librarians. Facet Publishing. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856048811

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Itsarangkul-Na-Ayutthaya, T., & Damrongpanit, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of instructional management model for students’ creative thinking development: An application of propensity score matching. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2429–2444. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2429

Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). 21st - Century skills. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Ed.), Science Education in Theory and Practice (pp. 479–496). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_32

Klebansky, A., & Fraser, S. P. (2013). A strategic approach to curriculum design for information literacy in teacher education–implementing an information literacy conceptual framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n11.5

Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practising flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009

Kozhevnikov, M., Kozhevnikov, M., Yu, C. J., & Blazhenkova, O. (2013). Creativity, visualization abilities, and visual cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12013

Kusunarningsih, S. (2018). Hubungan antara kompetensi literasi informasi dengan kemampuan menulis dan prestasi belajar mahasiswa universitas airlangga Surabaya [The relationship between information literacy competence and writing ability and student achievement at university of airlangga Surabaya] [Master’s Thesis, University of Airlangga]. Universitas Airlangga Repository. http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/74754

Ma, X., Yang, Y., Wang, X., & Zang, Y. (2018). An integrative review: Developing and measuring creativity in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 62, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.011

Marantika, J. E. R. (2019). The contribution of visual literacy and creative thinking on writing skills. Journal International Seminar on Languages, Literature, Arts, and Education, 1(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.21009/ISLLAE.01102

Maskur, R., Sumarno, Rahmawati, Y., Pradana, K., Syazali, M., Septian, A., & Kinarya Palupi, E. (2020). The effectiveness of problem based learning and aptitude treatment interaction in improving mathematical creative thinking skills on curriculum 2013. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.375

McKeever, C., Bates, J., & Reilly, J. (2017). School library staff perspectives on teacher information literacy and collaboration. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(2), 51–68. https://bit.ly/44NtAhd

McLoughlin, C. (1999). The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 222–241. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1859

Meo, S. A. (2018). Anatomy and physiology of a scientific paper. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 25(7), 1278–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.01.004

Michalska, P., & Zając-Lamparska, L. (2015). Measurement of cognitive style reflection-impulsivity in the adulthood-results of own study. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 20(4), 573–588. https://bit.ly/3r9Pc8J

Minchekar, V. S. (2017). The role of cognitive style in creative thinking among college students. Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal, 6(1), Article 555679. https://doi.org/10.19080/PBSIJ.2017.06.555679

Moleong, J. L. (2008). Metode penelitian kualitatif [Qualitative research methods]. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Moore, D. W., Bhadelia, R. A., Billings, R. L., Fulwiler, C., Heilman, K. M., Rood, K. M. J., & Gansler, D. A. (2009). Hemispheric connectivity and the visual–spatial divergent-thinking component of creativity. Brain and Cognition, 70(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.011

Morovat, E. (2014). Effects of reflectivity/impulsivity on IELTS candidates’ band scores in the speaking module of the test. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1232–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.538

Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005

Nugroho, A. A., Nizaruddin, N., Dwijayanti, I., & Tristianti, A. (2020). Exploring students’ creative thinking in the use of representations in solving mathematical problems based on cognitive style. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.9983

Nurzulifa, S., & Dwijanto, D. (2021). Creative thinking mathematical ability of students in treffinger learning based on cognitive style. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(1), 52–61. https://bit.ly/3JKverM

Othman, S., Steen, M., & Fleet, J.-A. (2021). A sequential explanatory mixed methods study design: An example of how to integrate data in a midwifery research project. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 11(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v11n2p75

Parikh, C., Maddulety, K., & Meadows, C. (2020). Improving creative ability of base of pyramid (BOP) students in India. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, Article 100652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100652

Rahayu, R., Kartono, Dwijanto, & Agoestanto, A. (2022). Problem-solving process of students with a reflective cognitive style based on the action-process-object-schema theory. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.41

Rahma, A. D., Sulhadi, & Sumarti, S. S. (2016). Implementasi pembelajaran sains dengan media fotonovela untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa SD/MI [Implementation of science learning using photonovela media to increase learning motivation of SD/MI students]. Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 1–9. https://bit.ly/3AJDgvQ

Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004

Rozencwajg, P., & Corroyer, D. (2005). Cognitive processes in the reflective-impulsive cognitive style. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.166.4.451-466

Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed). Academic/ Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-06920-7

Salleh, M. I. M., Halim, A. F. A., Yaacob, R. A. R., & Yusoff, Z. (2011). Measuring the effect of information literacy on the undergraduates’ academic performance in higher education. In C. H. Lin & C. M. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Social Science and Humanity (pp. 506–510). IACSIT Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3390.0804

Seçer, Z., Çeliköz, N., Koçyiǧit, S., Seçer, F., & Kayılı, G. (2009). Social skills and problem behaviour of children with different cognitive styles who attend preschool education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1554–1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.273

Setyana, I., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2019). Problem-solving in creative thinking process mathematics student’s based on their cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(2), Article 22123. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022123

Shannon, C., Reilly, J., & Bates, J. (2019). Teachers and information literacy: Understandings and perceptions of the concept. Journal of Information Literacy, 13(2), 41–72. https://bit.ly/44akcUQ

Simuth, J., & Sarmany-Schuller, I. (2014). Cognitive style variable in e-learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1464–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.417

Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Suryandari, K. C., Rokhmaniyah, & Wahyudi (2021). The Effect of scientific reading based project model in empowering creative thinking skills of preservice teacher in elementary school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1329

Torres-Valladares, D., Ballinas-García, E., Villarreal-Reyes, J., Morales-Álvarez, V., & Ortiz-del-Ánge, C. (2022). Research papers 101: The do’s and don’ts of scientific writing. Materials Today: Proceedings, 48(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.708

Vitse, C. L., & Poland, G. A. (2017). Writing a scientific paper—A brief guide for new investigators. Vaccine, 35(5), 722–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.091

Wang, A. Y. (2012). Exploring the relationship of creative thinking to reading and writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.09.001

Wang, J. C., Chapman, J. R., & Wiechert, K. (2017). How to write a scientific paper: Tips and highlights from the global spine congress members-only session. Global Spine Journal, 7(5), 393. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217721918

Warli. (2010). Profil kreativitas siswa yang bergaya kognitif reflektif dan siswa yang bergaya kognitif impulsif dalam memecahkan masalah geometri [Creativity profile of students with reflective and impulsive cognitive style in solving geometry problems]. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Warli, & Nofitasari, Y. (2021). Junior high school students’ mathematical connection: A comparative study of children who have reflective and impulsive cognitive styles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776, Article 12036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012036

Yildiz, C., & Yildiz, T. G. (2021). Exploring the relationship between creative thinking and scientific process skills of preschool children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100795

Yuniasari, A., & Zainuddin (2019). The impact of cognitive (reflectivity/ impulsivity ) on tertiary EFL learners ’ syntactic complexity in descriptive writing. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.86

...