Research Article
A Comparison between the Fifth Grade Intensive English Language Curriculum and the Fifth Grade English Language Curriculum: Students’ Achievement in Speaking

Suat Kaya

APA 7th edition
Kaya, S. (2019). A Comparison Between The Fifth Grade Intensive English Language Curriculum And The Fifth Grade English Language Curriculum: Students’ Achievement In Speaking. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 921-933.

Kaya S. 2019 'A Comparison Between The Fifth Grade Intensive English Language Curriculum And The Fifth Grade English Language Curriculum: Students’ Achievement In Speaking', European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), pp. 921-933.
Chicago 16th edition
Kaya Suat. "A Comparison Between The Fifth Grade Intensive English Language Curriculum And The Fifth Grade English Language Curriculum: Students’ Achievement In Speaking," European Journal of Educational Research 8, no. 4 (2019): 921-933.


It is aimed, in this study, to compare the achievement level of the students taught with the fifth grade intensive English language curriculum (IELC) and the ones taught with the fifth grade English language curriculum (ELC) in terms of their speaking skills. With this aim, it is also intended to find out the failure behind the students’ speaking skills. Sequential explanatory strategy, which is one of the mixed-methods research designs, was used for this study as the aim was to further explain the quantitative findings. There were two groups of participants in this study. The first group included 64 fifth grade students selected from two different schools though simple random sampling, while the second group consisted of the five teachers teaching the fifth grade IELC. Two instruments developed by the researcher were utilized to collect data. The first instrument was an achievement test developed to measure students’ success in speaking skills, while the second instrument was a semi-structured interview schedule developed to collect data from the teachers implementing the fifth grade IELC. The quantitative data collected through the achievement test were analyzed with descriptive statistics including means and standard deviations and inferential statistics through independent samples t-test which was used to compare the two groups of students’ achievement levels, while the qualitative data gathered through the semi-structured interviews were analyzed with content analysis. The findings indicated that only one objective was attained by the students, the results of independent samples t-test indicated that there was not a significant difference in the achievement levels of the students taught with the fifth grade IELC and the ones taught with the fifth grade ELC. The reasons behind this failure was found to be resulting from teacher-related, student-related, and Ministry of National Education (MoNE)-related factors referring to implementation problems rather than curriculum design.

Keywords: Fifth grade intensive English language curriculum, speaking skills achievement, failure factors, curriculum evaluation.


Akuzel, G. (2006). Ilkogretim 4-8. siniflarda yabanci dil ogretimindeki basarisizlik nedenlerinin incelenmesi (Adana ornegi) [Examination of the reasons behind the failure in the foreign language education in the fourth-eighth grade levels of elementary education (Adana case)] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Batdi, V. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions regarding the curriculum of an eighth grade English course based on the CIPP model. Mevlana International Journal of Moral and Values Education, 2(1), 55-71.

Buyukduman, F. I. (2005). The opinions of elementary school English teachers on the English curriculum for elementary schools. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2005), 55-64.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Demirtas, Z., & Erdem, S. (2015). Fifth grade English course curriculum: Comparison of the revised curriculum with the previous curriculum and teachers’ views related to the new curriculum. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 55-80.

Dincer, B. (2013). Evaluation of seventh grade English language curriculum according to Stufflebeam’s CIPP model (Unpublished master’s thesis). Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.

Donmez, O. (2010). Implementation of the new eighth grade English language curriculum from the perspectives of teachers and students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Er, K. O. (2006). Evaluation of English Curricula in Fourth and Fifth Grade Primary Schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Erdogan, V. (2005). An Evaluation of the English Curriculum Implemented at the Fourth and Fifth Grade Primary State Schools: The Views of the Teachers and the Students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

Ersen-Yanik, A. (2007). A study of English language curriculum implementation in sixth, seventh and eighth grades of public primary schools through teachers’ and students’ perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Erkan, M. A. (2009). Investigation of the matters confronted in application of the new English teaching curriculum for primary schools’ Fourth and Fifth grades (A case study in Gaziantep) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Fritz, W., Mollenberg, A., & Chen, G. (2002). Measuring intercultural sensitivity in different cultural contexts. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(2), 1-16.

Gunday, R. (2007). A study of the factors causing failure in foreign language teaching. National Education/Milli Egitim, 175, 210-229.

Gunes, T. (2009). Teachers’ Opinions on the English Language Curriculum of the Fifth Grade of Primary Education (Unpublished master’s thesis), Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Gurbuzturk, O., & Ceviz, S. N. (2018). An investigation of English teachers’ views towards the intensive foreign language. In S. Ural & O. Demirel (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th International Congress on Curriculum and Instruction (pp. 151-154). Kars, Turkey: Kars Kafkas University.

Hallgreen, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23-34.

Harman, K. (1999). Ilkogretim okullarinda yabanci dil dersi program uygulamalarinda karsilasilan sorunlar [Problems encountered in the application of foreign language courses in primary schools] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.

Isik, A. (2008). Yabanci dil egitimimizdeki yanlislar nereden kaynaklaniyor? [Where do the mistakes in our foreign language education come from?]. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 15-26.

Incecay, G. (2012). Turkey’s foreign language policy at primary level: Challenges in practice. International Association of Research in Foreign Language Education and Applied Linguistics ELT Research Journal, 1(1), 53-62.

Kaya, S. (2018). Evaluation of the middle school English language curriculum developed in 2012 utilizing Stake’s countenance evaluation model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Kaya, S., & Ok, A. (2016). The second grade English curriculum: Theory-practice congruence. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 6(4), 491-512. doi:

Kaya, S., Ok, A., & Urun, M. F. (2015, October). Evaluation of the eighth grade English curriculum in a public school. Paper presented at the 3rd International Congress on Curriculum and Instruction, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Kirkgoz, Y. (2007). Language planning and implementation in Turkish primary schools, Current Issues in Language Planning, 8(2), 174-191. doi: 10.2167/cilp114.0

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline for selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 2016(15), 155-163.

Koydemir, F. (2001). Erken yasta yabanci dil ogretiminin bazi degiskenler acisindan degerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of early foreign language teaching in terms of some variables] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.

Kozikoglu, I. (2014). An evaluation of the secondary school seventh grade English curriculum. Abant Izzet Baysal University Education Faculty Journal/Abant Izzet Baysal Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 14(1), 361-375.

LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852.

McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30-46.

Mersinligil, G. (2002). Evaluation of the English language curriculum for the fourth and fifth grade students in elementary education (a sample of Adana province) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ministry of National Education. (2013). Ilkogretim Kurumlari Ingilizce Dersi Ogretim Programi [English Language Curriculum for Elementary Schools]. Ankara, Turkey: National Education Press/ Milli Egitim Basimevi.

Ministry of National Education. (2017). Ilkogretim Kurumlari Ingilizce Dersi Ogretim Programi [English Language Curriculum for Elementary Schools]. Ankara, Turkey: National Education Press/ Milli Egitim Basimevi.

Ocak, G., Kizilkaya, H., & Boyraz, S. (2013). Evaluation of sixth grade English curriculum in terms of speaking skills and identifying causes of speaking problems students face. International Journal of Academic Research Part B, 5(3), 366-372. doi: 10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-3/B.55

Ormeci, D. M. (2009). An evaluation of English language curricula implemented at the fourth, fifth, and sixth grades in respect of teachers’ opinions (Unpublished master’s thesis). Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.

Rui, N., & Feldman, J. M. (2012). IRR (inter-rater reliability) of a COP (classroom observation protocol)-A critical appraisal. US-China Education Review B, 3, 305-315.

Seddon, G. M. (1978). The properties of Bloom's taxonomy of educational Objectives for the cognitive domain. Review of Educational Research, 48(2), 303-323.

Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428.

Sahenk-Erkan, S. S. (2015). Evaluation of primary school students’ achievement of objectives in English lessons. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(15), 2153-2163. doi: 10.5897/ERR2015.2397

Tekin-Ozel, R. (2011). Determination of challenges encountered in the implementation English curricula for primary schools (The sample of Ankara) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.  

Yaman, S. (2010). Assessment of English curriculum for primary schools’ fourth and fifth Grades according to teachers’ opinions (A Case Study in Gaziantep) (Unpublished master’s thesis). The University of Firat, Elazig, Turkiye.