logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
geometric thinking pre service teachers technology based media

A Systematic Review on Geometric Thinking: A Review Research Between 2017-2021

Trimurtini , S. B. Waluya , Y. L. Sukestiyarno , Iqbal Kharisudin

Geometric thinking affects success in learning geometry. Geometry is studied from elementary school to university level. Therefore, in higher educatio.

G

Geometric thinking affects success in learning geometry. Geometry is studied from elementary school to university level. Therefore, in higher education and basic education, it is necessary to carry out a systematic review in order to obtain tips for improving geometric thinking skills. A systematic review of geometric thinking was done in this study. In this study from 2017 to 2021, geometric thinking was investigated in the form of a synthesis review of the effect size of the given treatment. This is a comprehensive discussion of theories, models, and frameworks on the topic of geometric thinking from 36 articles. The research findings revealed that the interventions used were predominantly effective, with effect sizes ranging from "small" to "very large," with the "very large" effect obtained in the intervention of van Hiele's learning phase and various technology-based-media and concrete manipulative media. The research trend was reflected through twelve clusters of interrelated keywords. The results of this literature review suggested that it is necessary to carry out a specific study on how to achieve the highest level of geometric thinking, a more detailed form of scaffolding, and concrete manipulative media and technology that can be explored for a certain level of the participants’ geometric thinking.

Keywords: Geometric thinking, pre-service teachers, technology based-media.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
886
Download
952
Citations
Crossref
3

Scopus
1

References

Alex, J. K., & Mammen, K. J. (2016). Lessons learnt from employing van Hiele theory based instruction in senior secondary school geometry classrooms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(8), 2223-2236. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1228a

Altakhyneh, B. H. (2018). Levels of geometrical thinking of students receiving blended learning in Jordan. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(2), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i2.8289

Andini, S., Budiyono, & Fitriana, L. (2018). Developing flipbook multimedia: The achievement of informal deductive thinking level. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5396.227-238

Armah, R. B., Cofie, P. O., & Okpoti, C. A. (2018). Investigating the effect of van Hiele phase- based instruction on pre- service teachers’ geometric thinking. International Journal of Research in Education and Sciece, 4(1), 314-330. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383201

Armah, R. B., & Kissi, P. S. (2019). Use of the van Hiele theory in investigating teaching strategies used by college of education geometry tutors. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103562

Bokosmaty, S., Mavilidi, M., & Paas, F. (2017). Making versus observing manipulations of geometric properties of triangles to learn geometry using dynamic geometry software. Computers & Education, 113, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.008

Bulut, N., & Bulut, M. (2012). Development of pre- service elementary mathematics teachers’ geometric thinking levels through an undergraduate geometry course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 760–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.194

Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/749317

Carbonneau, K. J., Min, R., Borysenko, N., Hall, C., & States, U. (2020). The influence of perceptually rich manipulatives and collaboration on mathematic problem-solving and perseverance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101846

Çaylan, B., Masal, M., Masal, E., & Takunyacı, M. (2017). Investigating the relationship between prospective elementary mathematics teachers’ van Hiele geometric thinking levels and beliefs towards using origami in mathematics education in mathematics with origami course. Journal of Multidiciplinary Studies in Education, 1(1), 24–35. https://bit.ly/3NliwyY

Chang, K., Sung, Y.-T., & Lin, S.-Y. (2007). Developing geometry thinking through multimedia learning activities. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(5), 2212–2229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.007

Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-464). Macmillan.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Reseach method in education. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2019). The handbook of reserch synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed.). Russel Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448864

Crompton, H. (2017). Using mobile learning to support students’ understanding in geometry: A design-based research study. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 207–219. https://bit.ly/3Nlgqiw

Decano, R. S. (2017). Cognitive development of college students and their achievement in geometry : An evaluation using Piaget ’ s theory and van Hiele ’ s levels of thinking. American Journal of Applied Sciences Original, 14(9), 899–911. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2017.899.911

Denizli, Z. A., & Erdoğan, A. (2018). Development of a three dimensional geometric. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5741.213-226

Dimla, R. B. (2018). Probing students ’ levels of geometric thinking in geometry and their enacted example space function. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 4(1), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v4i1.162

Erdogan, F. (2020). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers ’ problem posing abilities in context of van Hiele levels of geometric thinking . International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2020.02.009

Fitriyani, H., Widodo, S. A., & Hendroanto, A. (2018). Students ’ geometric thinking based on van Hiele’s theory. Infinity Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i1.p53-60

Frank, A., & Ablordeppey, V. (2020). Enhancing students geometric thinking through phase-based instruction using geogebra to teach circle theorem at Abetifi College of Education. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 16(4), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.9790/5728-1604034254

Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3,i+1-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/749957

Gecu-parmaksiz, Z., & Delialioglu, O. (2019). Augmented reality-based virtual manipulatives versus physical manipulatives for teaching geometric shapes to preschool children. British Journal of Education Technology, 50(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12740

Gür, H., & Kobak-Demir, M. (2017). Geometry teaching via origami: The views of secondary mathematics teacher trainees. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(15), 65–71. https://bit.ly/3lmjDCF

Hamidah, & Kusuma, J. W. (2020). Analysis of student learning styles and geometry thinking skills: during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1657, 012036. https://bit.ly/38H73eh

Hamzeh, M. A. W. H. (2017). Levels of geometric thinking according to van hiele’ s model for classroom teacher students at Isra University in Jordan. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(5), 64–78. https://bit.ly/3G02GHr

Hassan, M. N., Abdullah, A. H., & Ismail, N. (2020). Effects of integrative interventions with van hiele phase on students’ geometric thinking: A systematic review. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(13), 1133–1140. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.13.194

Hoffer, A. (1981). Geometry is more than proof. Mathematics teacher, 74(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.74.1.0011

Hohol, M. (2020). Foundation of geometric cognition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056291

İbili, E., Çat, M., Resnyansky, D., Şahin, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 224-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1583382

Ilie, M. D., Maricuțoiu, L. P., Iancu, D. E., Smarandache, I. G., Mladenovici, V., Stoia, D. C. M., & Toth, S. A. (2020). Reviewing the research on instructional development programs for academics . Trying to tell a different story : A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 100331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100331

Jupri, A. (2018). Using the van Hiele theory to analyze primary school teachers’ written work on geometrical proof problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012117. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012117

Karatas, K., & Arpaci, I. (2021). The role of self-directed learning, metacognition, and 21st century skills predicting the readiness for online learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10786

Kennedy, L. M., Tipps, S., & Johnson, A. (2008). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics. Thomson Wadsworth.

Khasawneh, A. (2007). Spatial geometric thinking levels among tenth grade students. Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 11-32. https://bit.ly/3PyKGs0

Klemer, A., & Rapoport, S. (2020). Origami and geogebra activities contribute to geometric thinking in second graders. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8537

Kristanti, F., Ainy, C., & Shoffa, S. (2018). The effect of creative problem-solving learning model using geometry transformation book based on Al-qur’an on students’ van Hiele thinking level and learning outcome. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1088, 012053. https://bit.ly/3lqq3k7

Kusmaryono, I., Jupriyanto, & Kusumaningsih, W. (2021). Construction of students’ mathematical knowledge in the zone of proximal development and zone of potential construction. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.341

Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Geometric thinking ability for prospective mathematics teachers in solving ethnomathematics problem, Journal of Physics: Conference Series1808, 012040. https://bit.ly/3lojs9F

Luz, Y., & Yerushalmy, M. (2018). Students’ conceptions through the lens of a dynamic online geometry assessment platform. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.12.001

Mahfut, M., Sunardi, Yudianto, E., Purnomo, R. C., & Firmansyah, F. F. (2020). Deduction level of undergraduate students’ imagination in solving geometrical problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1465, 012062.   https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012062

Mammarella, I. C., Giofrè, D., & Caviola, S. (2017). Learning geometry: The development of geometrical concepts and the role of cognitive processes. In D. Geary, D. Berch, R. Ochsendorf & K. M. Koepke (Eds.), Acquisition of complex arithmetic skills and higher-order mathematics concepts (pp. 221–246). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805086-6.00010-2 

Mason, M. (1998). The van Hiele levels of geometric understanding. In L. McDougal (Ed.), The professional handbook for teachers: Geometry (pp. 4–8). McDougal Littell/Houghton-Mifflin.

Mayberry, J. (1983). The van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate preservice teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/748797

Mdyunus, A. S., & Hock, T. T. (2019). Geometric thinking of malaysian elementary school students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1095–1112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12170a

Mulenga, E. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the gateway for digital learning in mathematics education? Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep269. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/7949

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics overview. https://bit.ly/3win2Hw  

Ng, O. L., Shi, L., & Ting, F. (2020). Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: Dynamic geometry and 3D printing. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1

Nugraheni, L. R., Niasari, S. W., Andini, S., & Fitriana, L. (2018). Elementary school students visual spatial comprehension based on van Hiele theory: The case in Madiun , East Java , Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012097. https://bit.ly/3yNo0OM

Özçakır, B., Özdemir, D., & Kıymaz, Y. (2020). Effects of dynamic geometry software on students’ geometric thinking regarding probability of giftedness in mathematics. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(2), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.664985

Pasani, C. F. (2019). Analyzing elementary school students geometry comprehension based on van Hiele’s theory. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.5.31

Pathuddin, P., Rochaminah, S., & Hidayatullah, R. (2021). Implementation of van Hiele learning model assisted by manipulative media in circle materials to improve the learning outcomes of violent students inpres palupi elementary school. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2021.5101

Primasatya, N., & Jatmiko, J. (2019). Implementation of geometry multimedia based on van hiele’s thinking theory for enhancing critical thinking ability for grade V students. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(2), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v1i2.40

Rahman, H. S., Susanto, Hobri, Irfan, M., Karimah, R., & Albab, A. U. (2020). Scaffolding profile in solving geometry problems in terms of van Hiele level. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1538 (012069).  https://bit.ly/3lII913

Ramlan, A. M., & Hali, F. (2018). Analysis of the difficulty of mathematical education students in completing the geometric running problem based on van Hiele theory in geometry transformation. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 65–70. http://doi.org/10.31327/jomedu.v3i2.834

Risnawati, Andrian, D., Azmi, M. P., Amir, Z., & Nurdin, E. (2019). Development of a definition maps-based plane geometry module to improve the student teachers’ mathematical reasoning ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12333a

Rofii, A., Sunardi, S., & Irvan, M. (2018). Characteristics of students’ metacognition process at informal deduction thinking level in geometry problems. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i1.7684

Salifu, A. S., Yakubu, A.-R., & Ibrahim, F. I. (2018). Van Hiele geometric thinking levels of pre-service teachers’ of E.P. college of education, Bimbilla-Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(23), 108–119. https://bit.ly/3FYm6MQ

Siew, N. M., Chong, C. L., & Abdullah, M. R. (2013). Facilitating student’s geometric thinking through van Hiele’s phase-based learning using tangram. Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2013.101.111

Škrbec, M., & Čadež, T. H. (2015). Identifying and fostering higher levels of geometric thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1339a

Sudihartinih, E. (2019). Analysis of students’ self efficacy reviewed by geometric thinking levels and gender using rasch model. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(1), 509–519. https://bit.ly/3LPHYfu

Sudihartinih, E., & Wahyudin. (2019). The van Hiele levels of geometric of students in first semester reviewed from gender. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4), 042034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042034

Surati, Safitri, D., Bachtiar, S., Rijal, M., & Mastuti, A. G. (2021). Metacognitive skills for the integrated problem based numbered head together learning. Journal of Southwest Jiangtong University, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.2.49

Syamsuddin, A. (2019). Investigating student ’s geometric thinking in looking for the linkages of quadrilaterals (a case study on students in the formal operation stage ). International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 14(7), 435–444. https://bit.ly/3kZEwn3

Tieng, P. G., & Eu, L. K. (2018). Effect of phase-based instruction using geometer ’ s sketchpad on geometric thinking regarding angles. Pertanika Journal Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(1), 329–344. https://bit.ly/3MNYNHS

Trimurtini, Safitri, T. R., Sari, E., & Nugraheni, N. (2020). The effectivity of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach with geoboard media on mathematics learning for four-grade elementary students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663, 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012050

Trimurtini, T., Waluya, S. B., Walid, W., Dwidayati, N. K., & Kharisudin, I. (2021). Measuring spatial ability and geometric thinking level of prospective elementary school teachers using the rasch model. Elementary Education Online/ Ilkogretim Online, 20(1), 948–957. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.91

Usman, H., Yew, W. T., & Saleh, S. (2020). Effects of van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy and gender on pre-service mathematics teachers’ geometry achievement in Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2006. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8363

Van de Walle, J. A. (2018). Elementary and middle school mathematics teaching development (8th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Yi, M., Flores, R., & Wang, J. (2020). Examining the influence of van Hiele theory-based instructional activities on elementary preservice teachers’ geometry knowledge for teaching 2-D shapes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103038

Yudianto, E., Sunardi, Sugiarti, T., Susanto, Suharto, & Trapsilasiwi, D. (2018). The identification of van Hiele level students on the topic of space analytic geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012078. https://bit.ly/3PusUq2

...