Adaptation of Teachers’ Teaching Thinking Practices Scale into English
APA 7th edition
Dilekli, Y., & Tezci, E. (2019). Adaptation Of Teachers’ Teaching Thinking Practices Scale Into English. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 943-953. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.943
Dilekli Y., and Tezci E. 2019 'Adaptation Of Teachers’ Teaching Thinking Practices Scale Into English', European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), pp. 943-953.
Chicago 16th edition
Dilekli Yalcin, and Tezci Erdogan. "Adaptation Of Teachers’ Teaching Thinking Practices Scale Into English," European Journal of Educational Research 8, no. 4 (2019): 943-953. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.943
This study aims to adapt teachers’ classroom practices for teaching thinking scale from Turkish to English culture. The scale includes 21 items. Each item has 5-point Likert type. It has 4 factors: Effectiveness of Teaching Thinking, Loyalty to Curriculum, Teacher Dependence and Encouraging Thinking. In the first step, statistical analyses were administrated to achieve linguistic equivalence. To do that, the data were collected from 30 English teachers with 20 day intervals. In the second step, the data collected from 148 native English teachers were analysed by Confirmatory Factor Analyses. Good level fitting indices were found at the end of this process. Cronbach Alpha coefficient value was found to be .90. For Convergence and Discriminating validity, which means construct validity, correlations between sub-dimensions and average explained variance values were calculated and found good sufficient levels. Items in the scale were discriminating. As a result of this study, it was found that English translation of the scale was statistically valid and reliable.
Keywords: Teaching thinking, classroom practices, linguistic validity, teaching thinking practices.
Alvino, J. (1990). A glossary of thinking-skills terms. Learning, 18(6), 50-55.
Beyer, B. K. (2010). What research tells us about teaching thinking skills. The Social Studies, 99(5), 223-232.
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Boyer, E. L. (1995). The basic school: A community for learning. Princeton, NJ: The Carnigie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Costa, L. A. (2001). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Melbourne, Astralia: ASCD.
De Bono, E. (1976). Teaching thinking. London, UK: Maurice Temple Smith.
Dilekli, Y. (2015). The relationship among teachers’ classroom practices for teaching thinking skills, teachers’ self-efficacy towards teaching thinking skills and teachers’ teaching styles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey.
Dilekli, Y. (2019). What are the dimensions of thinking skills in Turkish literature: a content analysis study? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(1), 110 - 118.
Dilekli, Y., & Tezci, E. (2015). The study of validity and reliability of teachers’ classroom practices for teaching thinking scale. Education Sciences, 10(4), 276-290.
Dilekli, Y., & Tezci, E. (2016). The relationship among teachers’ classroom practices for teaching thinking skills, teachers’ self-efficacy towards teaching thinking skills and teachers’ teaching styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 144-151.
Dilekli, Y., & Tezci, E. (2018). Adaptation of teachers' self-efficacy towards teaching thinking skills scale into English. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(11), 260-270.
Doganay, A., & Sari, M. (2012). A study of developing the thinking-friendly classroom scale (TFCS), Elementary Education Online, 11(1), 214-229.
Geisinger, K. E. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304-312.
Hashim, H. (2004). Malaysian teachers’ attitudes, competency and practices in teaching thinking, Intellectual Discourse, 11(1), 27-50.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(4), 1-55.
Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.7. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516.
McGuinness, C., Eakin, A., Curry, C., Bunting, B., & Sheehy, N. (2003). ACTS II sustainable thinking classrooms. Belfast, Ireland: Queen’s University.
Nair, S., & Ngang, T. K. (2012). Exploring parents’ and teachers’ views of primary pupils’ thinking skills and problem solving skills. Creative Education, 3(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.31005
Nispet, D. J. (1990). Teaching Thinking: An introduction to the research literature: UK. Glasgow, UK: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Onosko, J. J. (1991). Barriers to the promotion of higher-order thinking in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 19(4), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1991.10505646.
Ontario Council of Regents (1990). Vision 2000: Quality and opportunity. Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Colleges and Universities.
Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173-184.
Siegel, H. (2010). On thinking skills, Teaching thinking: Key debates in educational policy, 87-90 (Ed. Winch, C.). London, UK: Continium Press.
Swartz, R., & Parks, S. (1994). Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into content instruction. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking & Software
Tebbs, T. J. (2000). Assessing teachers' self-efficacy towards teaching thinking skills. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, USA.
Tishman, S., Perkins, D. N., & Jay, E. S. (1995). The thinking classroom: Learning and teaching in a culture of thinking. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Williams, R. L. (1999). Operational definitions and assessment of higher order cognitive constructs. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 411-427