Analyzing Second-Year University Students’ Rational Number Understanding: A Case on Interpreting and Representing Fraction
This research aims to determine second-year university students’ understanding in interpreting and representing fractions. A set of fraction tes.
- Pub. date: July 15, 2022
- Pages: 1747-1762
- 343 Downloads
- 453 Views
- 2 Citations
This research aims to determine second-year university students’ understanding in interpreting and representing fractions. A set of fraction tests was given to students through two direct learning interventions. An unstructured interview was used as an instrument to obtain explanations and confirmations from the purposive participants. A total of 112 student teachers of primary teacher education program at two private universities in Indonesia were involved in this research. A qualitative method with a holistic type case study design was used in this research. The results indicate that a significant percentage of the participants could not correctly interpret and represent fractions. In terms of interpretation, it is found how language could obscure the misunderstanding of fractions. Then, the idea of a fraction as part of a whole is the most widely used in giving meaning to a fraction compared to the other four interpretations, but with limited understanding. Regarding data representation, many participants failed to provide a meaningful illustration showing the improper fraction and mix number compared to the proper fraction. Improvement of fraction teaching at universities - particularly in primary teacher education programs - is needed so that students get the opportunity to develop and improve their knowledge profoundly. We discuss implications for teaching fractions.
Keywords: Interpreting fraction, rational number, representing fraction.
References
Albert B. Bennett, J., Burton, L. J., & Nelson, L. T. (2012). Mathematics for elementary teachers: A conceptual approach (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2014). Introduction to research in education (9th ed.). Nelson Education, Ltd.
Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T. R., & Silver, E. A. (1983). Rational-number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. S. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 91–125). Academic Press. https://bit.ly/34dD3EU
Billstein, R., Libeskind, S., & Lott, J. (2014). A problem solving approach to mathematics for elementary school teachers (8th ed.). Pearson.
Brijlall, D., Bansilal, S., & Moore-Russo, D. (2012). Exploring teachers’ conceptions of representations in mathematics through the lens of positive deliberative interaction. Pythagoras, 33(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i2.165
Castro-Rodríguez, E., & Rico, L. (2021). Knowledge of preservice elementary teachers on fractions. Uniciencia, 35(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.35-2.10
Chapin, S. H., & Johnson, A. (2006). Math matters understanding the math you teach grades K–8. Math Solutions Publications. https://bit.ly/3slZaAY
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson. https://bit.ly/3B1EYrY
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Damrongpanit, S. (2019). From modern teaching to mathematics achievement: The mediating role of mathematics attitude, achievement motivation, and self-efficacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.713
Depaepe, F., Torbeyns, J., Vermeersch, N., Janssens, D., Janssen, R., Kelchtermans, G., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers: A comparison of prospective elementary and lower secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.009
Forgues, H. L., Tian, J., & Siegler, R. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult? Developmental Review, 38(1), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.008
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
Freudenthal, H. (2002). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goldin, G. A. (2014). Mathematical representations. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 409–413). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_103
Indonesia Ministry of National Education and Culture. (2016). Kompetensi inti dan kompetensi dasar pelajaran pada kurikulum 2013 pada pendidikan dasar dan menengah [Core and basic competencies of lessons in the 2013 curriculum for elementary and secondary level]. Kemendikbud. https://bit.ly/333V1cg
Ivars, P., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2020). A learning trajectory as a scaffold for pre-service teachers’ noticing of students’ mathematical understanding. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09973-4
Ivars, P., Fernández, C., Llinares, S., & Choy, B. H. (2018). Enhancing noticing: Using a hypothetical learning trajectory to improve pre-service primary teachers’ professional discourse. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(11), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93421
Johar, R., Yusniarti, S., & Saminan. (2018). The analysis of proportional reasoning problem in the Indonesian mathematics textbook for the junior high school. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55–68. https:/doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4145.55-68
Kang, R., & Liu, D. (2018). The importance of multiple representations of mathematical problems: Evidence from chinese preservice elementary teachers’ analysis of a learning goal. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9760-8
Kennedy, L. M., Tipps, S., & Johnson, A. (2011). Guiding children ’ s learning of mathematics (12th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth. https://bit.ly/3uq7ySB
Kieren, T. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive, and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. A. Lesh & D. A. Bradbard (Eds.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop. (pp. 101–140). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED120027.pdf
Kieren, T. (1980). The rational number construct--its elements and mechanisms. In T. Kieren (Ed.), Recent research on number learning (Vol. 13, Issue 5, pp. 125–150). ERIC. https://doi.org/10.2307/749014
Klemer, A., Rapoport, S., & Lev-Zamir, H. (2019). The missing link in teachers’ knowledge about common fractions division. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(8), 1256–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1522677
Lamon, S. J. (2020). Teaching fractions and ratios for understandin: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008057
Lazić, B., Abramovich, S., Mrđa, M., & Romano, D. A. (2017). On the teaching and learning of fractions through a conceptual generalization approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(8), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/646
Lee, S. J., Brown, R. E., & Orrill, C. H. (2011). Mathematics teachers’ reasoning about fractions and decimals using drawn representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(3), 198–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.564993
Lemonidis, C., & Pilianidis, N. (2020). The 8 th grade students ’ competencies in alternating different symbolic representations of rational numbers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7865
Lenz, K., & Wittmann, G. (2021). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural fraction knowledge : What makes the difference and what does it look like ? International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9282
Lestari, A. S. B., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, Chandra, T. D., & Irfan, M. (2020). Commognitive analysis of students difficulty in solving fractional problems. In S. A. Widodo, S. Maharani, E. F. Ningsih, L. Nurdiyanto, & H. Nurdiyanto (Eds.), Proceedings of the SEMANTIK conference of mathematics education (SEMANTIK 2019) (pp. 110–115). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200827.127
Leung, I. K. C., & Carbone, R. E. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge about fraction division reflected through problem posing. The Mathematics Educator, 14(2), 80–92. https://bit.ly/3u9aEsl
Mastuti, G. A. (2017). Representasi siswa sekolah dasar dalam pemahaman konsep pecahan [Representation of elementary school students in understanding the concept of fractions]. Matematika Dan Pembelajaran/ Math and Learning, 5(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.33477/MP.V5I2.234
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Musser, G. L., Burger, W. F., & Peterson, B. E. (2011). Mathematics for elementary teachers: A contemporary approach (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2012). NCTM CAEP standards 2012: Elementary mathematics specialist. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://bit.ly/3J7LmAQ
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical succes for all. https://www.nctm.org/PtA/
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2015). NCTM CAEP mathematics content for elementary mathematics specialist addendum to the NCTM CAEP standards 2012. https://bit.ly/3snggye
Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y. D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
Novita, R., & Herman, T. (2021). Using technology in young children mathematical learning: A didactic perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1957, 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1957/1/012013
Obersteiner, A., Reiss, K., van Dooren, W., & van Hoof, J. (2019). Understanding rational numbers – Obstacles for learners with and without mathematical learning difficulties. In A. Fritz, V. Geraldi, & P. Rasanen (Eds.), International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 581–594). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_34
Osana, H. P., & Royea, D. A. (2011). Obstacles and challenges in preservice teachers’explorations with fractions: A view from a small-scale intervention study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.07.001
Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2014). Number teaching and learning. In S. Lerman, E. B. Sriraman, E. Jablonka, Y. Shimizu, M. Artigue, R. Even, R. Jorgensen, & M. Graven (Eds.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 470–476). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8
Pournara, C., Hodgen, J., Adler, J., & Pillay, V. (2015). Can improving teachers’ knowledge of mathematics lead to gains in learners’ attainment in mathematics? South African Journal of Education, 35(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n3a1083
Putra, Z. H. (2016). Evaluation of elementary teachers’ knowledge on fraction multiplication using anthropological theory. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education Hamburg (pp. 1–4). Springer Open. https://bit.ly/3B0WhJz
Santagata, R., & Lee, J. (2021). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: A study of novice elementary school teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09447-y
Siegler, R., & Braithwaite, D. W. (2017). Numerical development. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044101
Siegler, R., & Forgues, H. L. (2017). Hard lessons: Why rational number arithmetic is so difficult for so many people. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417700129
Siegler, R., & Pyke, A. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1994–2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031200
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Tian, J., & Siegler, R. (2018). Which type of rational numbers should students learn first? Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9417-3
Viseu, F., Martins, P. M., & Leite, L. (2020). Prospective primary school teachers’ activities when dealing with mathematics modelling tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.7946.301-318
Vula, E., & Kingji-Kastrati, J. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(5), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68342-3_8
Wahyu, K., Kuzu, T. E., Subarinah, S., Ratnasari, D., & Mahfudy, S. (2020). Partitive fraction division: Revealing and promoting primary students’ understanding. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.11062.237-258
Webster, V. (2020). Preservice teachers ’ strategies for interpreting fractions represented in discrete and continuous models. Trasformations: Research Paper, 4, 1–3. https://bit.ly/3zq975j
Westenskow, A., Moyer-packenham, P. S., Anderson-pence, K. L., Shumway, J. F., & Jordan, K. (2014). Cute drawings? The disconnect between students’ pictorial representations and their mathematical responses to fractions questions. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 81–105. https://bit.ly/331sd4b
Wijaya, A. (2017). The relationships between Indonesian fourth graders’ difficulties in fractions and the opportunity to learn fractions: A snapshot of TIMSS results. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10413a
Yetim, S., & Alkan, R. (2013). How middle school students deal with rational numbers? A mixed methods research study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9211a
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research: Design and method (6th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.