Applying Transcript Based Lesson Analysis in Enhancing Communication Pattern between Teacher and Students in Chemistry Classroom
Transcript Based Lesson Analysis (TBLA) is a transcript-based learning analysis method developed at Nagoya University, Japan. This new method is belie.
- Pub. date: April 15, 2021
- Pages: 975-987
- 841 Downloads
- 596 Views
- 4 Citations
Transcript Based Lesson Analysis (TBLA) is a transcript-based learning analysis method developed at Nagoya University, Japan. This new method is believed to justify the success of instructional design planned by the teacher. So far, the success of learning design has been reflected in student learning outcomes, even though the learning outcome data are not sufficient to provide an overview of the actual classroom conditions. This study aims to analyse the communication patterns in learning Chemistry using the TBLA method. This research is a descriptive qualitative study that analysed the lesson of Chemical Bonds and Carbon Atoms Characteristics, which were conducted in two Senior High Schools in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. The data were collected using observation and documentation study. The lessons recorded using cameras and camcorders devices were transcribed and analysed using the Excel program based on the number of words spoken by teachers and students and the frequency of keywords in learning chemistry. The data were transformed into graphs. The results showed that analysis using TBLA provided integrated information about communication patterns and classroom quality. In these two classes, communication pattern occurs in Chemistry learning was teacher-student interaction only. The multi-ways transactions pattern has not occurred. The low quality of teacher questions and the incomplete deep learning phase in learning chemistry caused the expected multi-directional transaction communication has not been conducted. The result implies that TBLA is an effective tool to reflect on teacher practices and improve their teaching process for better instructional practices.
Keywords: Communication pattern, transcript-based lesson analysis, chemistry learning, teacher-student interaction.
References
Amin, S., Sumarmi, S., Bachri, S., Susilo, S., & Bashith, A. (2020). The effect of problem-based hybrid learning (PBHL) models on spatial thinking ability and geography learning outcomes. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning , 15(19), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i19.15729
Arani, M. R. S. (2017). Raising the quality of teaching through Kyouzai Kenkyuu – the study of teaching materials. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-07-2016-0018
Arani, M. R. S., Lander, B., Shibata, Y., Lee, C., Kuno, H., & Lau, A. (2019). From “chalk and talk” to “guide on the side”: a cross‐cultural analysis of pedagogy that drives customised teaching for personalised learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 23-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12340
Barnlund, D. C. (1970). A transactional model of communication in foundations of communication theory. In K. K. Sereno & C. D. Mortensen (Eds.), Foundations of communication theory (pp. 83–102). Harper and Row.
Bature, I. J., & Atweh, B. (2019). Collaboration: A collective bargain for achieving quality mathematics classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 347-361. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.347
Biggers, M. (2018). Questioning questions: elementary teachers' adaptations of investigation questions across the inquiry continuum. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9556-4
Bransford, J., Stevens, R., Schwartz, D., Meltzoff, A., Pea, R., Roschelle, J., Vye, N., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Barron, B., Reeves, B., & Sabelli, N. (2006). Learning theories and education: toward a decade of synergy. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 209–244). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Brown, G. (1976). Microteaching: a programme of teaching skills. British Journal of Educational Studies, 24(2), 180-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/3120386
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171
Chotitham, S., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. (2014). Deep learning and its effects on achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11(6), 3313-3316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.754
Doménech-Betoret, F., Gómez-Artiga, A., & Abellán-Roselló, L. (2019). The educational situation quality model: a new tool to explain and improve academic achievement and course satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1692. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2019.01692
Donker, A., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath -van Ewijk, C., & Van der Werf, M. (2014). Effectiveness of self-regulated learning strategies on academic performance: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
Gage N. A., Scott T., Hirn R., & MacSuga-Gage A. S. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ implementation of classroom management practices and student behavior in elementary school. Behavioral Disorders, 43(2), 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 01987429177 14809
Garrison, R. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., & Kappelman, J. (2006). Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: negotiated coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1). 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001
Hammer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman.
Hanrahan, M. U. (2006). Highlighting hybridity: critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90 (1), 8-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20087
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Jacques, L., A., Cian, H., Herro, D. C., & Quigley, C. (2020). The impact of questioning techniques on steam instruction. Action in Teacher Education, 42(3), 290-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848
Janah, N., Nahadi, Hendayana, S., & Tresnasih, N. (2019). Using transcript-based lesson analysis to determine teacher discourse move-in science lesson. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022062.02 2063
Kanuka, H. (2010). Characteristics of effective and sustainable teaching development programs for quality teaching in higher education. Higher Education, Management and Policy, 22(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-22-5kmbq08ncr25
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lee, S., C., & Irving, K., E. (2018). Development of two-dimensional classroom discourse analysis tool (CDAT): scientific reasoning and dialog patterns in the secondary science classes. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40594-018-0100-0
Loef Frank, M., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Understanding teaching and classroom practice in mathematics. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp 225-256). Information Age Publishing.
Mapplebeck, A., & Dunlop, L. (2019). Oral interactions in secondary science classrooms: a grounded approach to identifying oral feedback types and practices. Research in Science Education, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9843-y
Matra, S. D. (2014). Teacher questioning in classroom interaction. A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 14(1), 82-111. https://doi.org/10.24167/ celt.v14i1.58
Pimentel, D. S., & McNeill, K. L. (2016). Secondary science students' beliefs about class discussions: A case study comparing and contrasting academic tracks. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2047-2068. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500693. 2016.1225183
Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 2, 5th ed., pp. 679–744). John Wiley and Sons.
Schramm, W. (1997). The beginnings of communication study in America. Sage Publication Inc. 09
Taat, M. S., Abdulbaki, K., & Al-Saqqaf, A. (2020). The impact of lecture and interactive methods on student’s English competency. International Journal of Emerging Tech-nologies in Learning, 15(20), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i20.16683
Vale, R. D. (2013). The value of asking questions. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 24(6), 680-682. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E12-09-0660
Van Booven, C. D. (2015). Revisiting the authoritative–dialogic tension in inquiry-based elementary science teacher questioning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1182-1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1023868
Van der Veen, C., Van der Wilt, F., Van Kruistum, C., Van Oers, B., & Michaels, S. (2017). Model2talk: An intervention to promote productive classroom talk. Reading Teacher, 70(6), 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1573
Weasel, L. (2017). From deliberative democracy to communicative democracy in the class-room. A response to "education for deliberative democracy: A typology of classroom discussions." Democracy & Education, 25(1), 1-6.
Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Postsecondary Education, 23(1), 92-97.
Zhang Y., & Patrick P. (2012). Introducing questioning techniques to pre-service teachers. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 1(2), 159-184.