logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
elementary teachers online learning students engagement technological tools tools

Elementary Teachers’ Development in Using Technological Tools to Engage Students in Online Learning

Wajeeh Daher , Ahlam Anabousy , Essa Alfahel

Technological tools are means by which online teaching could encourage the engagement of students, especially elementary students. The present researc.

T

Technological tools are means by which online teaching could encourage the engagement of students, especially elementary students. The present research studies how elementary teachers develop their use of technological tools in their asynchronous and synchronous online teaching, specifically when this online teaching occurs during emergency education. The research was conducted in the academic year 2019/2020. We interviewed two elementary teachers, where one of them taught asynchronous lessons more than synchronous, while the second taught synchronous lessons more than asynchronous. We analyzed the data using two frameworks: one for interaction type and one for engagement type. The research results indicated that different interaction types influenced teachers’ decisions to use technological tools. In addition, what concerned the teachers’ use of tools at the beginning was the cognitive engagement, but they advanced towards focusing on behavioral and the affective engagement.

Keywords: Elementary teachers, online learning, students’ engagement, technological tools, tools.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
272
Download
478
Citations
Crossref
2

Scopus
9

References

Abukhalil, T. A., Halawani, S. M., & Daher, W. (2021). School principals' evaluation of the effectiveness of employing distance learning tools by teachers. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(19), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i19.24837

Abuzant, M., Ghanem, M., Abd-Rabo, A., & Daher, W. (2021). Quality of using google classroom to support the learning processes in the Automation and Programming course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(06), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i06.18847

Almonacid-Fierro, A., Philominraj, A., Vargas-Vitoria, R., & Fierro, M. A. (2022). Perceptions about teaching in times of COVID-19 pandemic: Experience of secondary education in Chile. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.457

Anabousy, A., & Tabach, M. (2016, July 24-31). Using GeoGebra to enhance students' inquiry activity [Paper presentation]. The 13th International Congress in Mathematics Education. Hamburg, Germany.

 Anabousy, A., & Tabach, M. (2017, July 3-6). Students' expanding of the Pythagorean theorem in a technological context [Paper presentation]. The Thirteenth International Conference of Technology in Mathematics Teaching. Lyon, France. 

Anabousy, A., & Tabach, M. (2021, July 11-18). The development of technological craft knowledge within a community of inquiry [Paper presentation]. The 14th International Congress in Mathematics Education. Shanghai, China.

Assaf, J., & Nehmeh, L. (2022). The remote learning experience in Lebanon: Learners’ attitudes and practices. Pedagogical Research, 7(1), em0115. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11551

Baya'a, N., & Daher, W. (2013). Teachers' readiness to integrate ICT in the classroom: The case of elementary and middle school Arab teachers in Israel. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 8(1), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v8i1.2386

Baya'a, N., Daher, W., & Anabousy, A. (2019). The development of in-service mathematics teachers' integration of ICT in a community of practice: Teaching-in-context theory. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(01), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i01.9134

Beggs, P., Shields, C., Telfer, S., & Bernard, J. L. (2012). A shifting landscape: Pedagogy, technology, and the new terrain of innovation in a digital world. Ontario Ministry of Education.

Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Fors, U., & Knutsson, O. (2020). Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school. Computers and Education, 149, 103783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103783

Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041

Bravo, E., Amante, B., Simo, P., Enache, M., & Fernandez, V. (2011, April 4-6). Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation [Paper presentation]. IEEE global engineering education conference. Amman, Jordan. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773205   

Çoklar, A. N., & Yurdakul, I. K. (2017). Technology integration experiences of teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2017-0002

Cutts, J. (2019). The role of the technology coordinator in supporting the successful implementation of a 1: 1 chromebook initiative [Doctoral dissertation, University of New England]. All Theses and Dissertations. https://bit.ly/3qoMxoq  

Daher, W. (2009). Preservice teachers' perceptions of applets for solving mathematical problems: Need, difficulties and functions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 383-395. https://bit.ly/3qt6o5V  

Daher, W. (2010a). Building mathematical knowledge in an authentic mobile phone environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1104

Daher, W. (2010b). Mathematics learning community flourishes in the cellular phone environment. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2010040101

Daher, W., & Awawdeh Shahbari, J. (2020). Secondary students’ identities in the virtual classroom. Sustainability, 12(11), 4407. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114407

Dill, E., Fischer, K., McMurtrie, B., & Supiano, B. (2020, March 6). As coronavirus spreads, the decision to move classes online is the first step. What comes next. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://bit.ly/3tt1xUc

Dixson, M. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1– 13. https://bit.ly/3wrxtuc  

Fram, S. M. (2013). The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1569

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gooler, D., Kautzer, K., & Knuth, R. (2000). Teacher competence in using technologies: The next big question (ED452175). ERIC. https://bit.ly/3NaXcwL

Grandzol, J. R., & Grandzol, C. J. (2006). Best practices for online business education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v7i1.246

Gregory, S., & Bannister-Tyrrell, M. (2017). Digital learner presence and online teaching tools: higher cognitive requirements of online learners for effective learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0059-3

Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG  

Hamdan, R., Ashour, W., & Daher, W. (2021). The role of the E-learning departments in controlling the quality of electronic assessments in Palestinian universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(21), 12021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112021

Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2019). Technological innovations and practices in engineering education: A review. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(2), 713–728.

Hindun, I., Husamah, H., Nurwidodo, N., Fatmawati, D., & Fauzi, A. (2021). E-learning in COVID-19 pandemic: Does it challenge teachers’ work cognition and metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 547-566. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14332a

Hromek, R., & Roffey, S. (2009). Promoting social and emotional learning with games: “It’s fun and we learn things”. Simulation & Gaming, 40(5), 626-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109333793

Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernández-García, Á., Chaparro-Peláez, J., & Prieto, J. L. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students' academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in human behavior, 119, 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713

Ishtiaq Khan, R. M., Ali, A., Kumar, T., Shahbaz, M., & Alourani, A. (2022). An investigation of the educational challenges during COVID-19: A case study of Saudi students' experience. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 353-363. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.353

Jonsson, H. (2015, October 21-24). Using flipped classroom, peer discussion, and just-in-time teaching to increase learning in a programming course [Paper presentation]. 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Camino Real El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344221

Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). The use of computer tools to support meaningful learning. AACE Journal, 16(1), 77-92. https://bit.ly/3wlQ9LQ

Khan, R. M. I., Ali, A., Alourani, A., Kumar, T., & Shahbaz, M. (2022). An investigation of the educational challenges during covid-19: A case study of Saudi students' experience. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 353-363. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.353

Koumi, J. (2006). Designing video and multimedia for open and flexible learning. Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966280

Madden, D. C. (2014). Inclusive education in rural Alberta, Canada: Utilizing ICT to support twenty-first century learning. In R. Huang, Kinshuk & J. Price (eds), ICT in education in global context (pp. 19-30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43927-2_2

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Moore, M. J. (1993). Three types of interaction. In Harry, K., John, M., & Keegan, D. (Eds.), Distance education theory (pp. 19-24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Mortensen, L. L. (2000). Teacher education for sustainability. Global change education: the scientific foundation for sustainability. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009468806854

Mukhari, S. S. (2016). Teachers’ experience of information and communication technology use for teaching and learning in urban schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa]. UNISA Institutional Repository. https://bit.ly/3L8rfDD  

Murphy, E., Rodríguez‐Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publishing.

Roblyer, M. D., Porter, M., Bielefeldt, T., & Donaldson, M. B. (2009). “Teaching online made me a better teacher” Studying the impact of virtual course experiences on teachers’ face-to-face practice. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(4), 121-126. https://bit.ly/3ql0XWL

Schmidt, K. (2004). A model to integrate online teaching and learning tools into the classroom. Journal of Technology Studies, 30(2), 86-92. https://bit.ly/3N7ROur

Sivakumar, R. (2019). Google forms in education. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research and Innovations, 9(1), 35-39. https://bit.ly/36j592f  

Syed, M., & Nelson, S. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2167696815587648

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers (Version 3). https://bit.ly/3tu6fkx

Walker, C. H. (2016). The correlation between types of instructor-student communication in online graduate courses and student satisfaction levels in the private university setting (Publication no. 10109976) [Doctoral dissertation, Carson-Newman University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Watson, W. R., Mong, C. J., & Harris, C. A. (2011). A case study of the in-class use of a video game for teaching high school history. Computers & Education, 56(2), 466-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.007

Woodcock, S., Sisco, A., & Eady, M. J. (2015). The learning experience: Training teachers using online synchronous environments. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 5(1), 21–34. http://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2015.05.1.02

...