HOTSEP: Revised Anderson’s Taxonomy in Environmental Learning of COVID-19
Environmental learning in the 21st century requires a high level of thinking ability, especially to solve environmental problems when COVID-19 pandemi.
- Pub. date: July 15, 2020
- Pages: 1257-1265
- 1330 Downloads
- 766 Views
- 16 Citations
Environmental learning in the 21st century requires a high level of thinking ability, especially to solve environmental problems when COVID-19 pandemic. This was to develop a new level of thinking, namely Higher Order Thinking Skills of Environmental Problem (HOTSEP) which is a revision of Anderson's Taxonomy. The purpose of this study was to measure students HOTSEP in the context of environmental problems related to COVID-19. The research method used in this research was descriptive. The sample used 277 university students from several cities in Indonesia. The instrument used HOTSEP which has 3 categories of thinking level start from develop innovation about environment (C6), solve environmental problem (C5), criticize environmental problem (C4). The results showed that students HOTSEP were still in the very low category (33.64). This study concludes that the HOTSEP of students was still low and needs to be improved to the understanding of COVID-19 concept in environmental learning. Suggestion for further research was HOTSEP need to implement in school or university for several environmental learning topics in many subjects/courses start from Natural Science, Social Science, Engineering, and others relevant subject. HOTSEP can be measured not only in school or university, HOTSEP can be implement in community and public.
Keywords: COVID-19, environmental learning, HOTSEP.
References
Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Halim, N. D. A., Ali, D. F., Tahir, L. M., & Kohar, U. H. A. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ level of knowledge and practice on the implementation of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00601a
Alias, N., Dewitt, D., & Siraj, S. (2013). Design and development of webquest for physics module by employing isman instructional design model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.335
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airiasian, W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bakker, A., & Wagner, D. (2020). Pandemic: Lessons for today and tomorrow? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09946-3
Beckwith, P. T. (2019). The HOTSHOT taxonomy and a signature pedagogy framework for operating department practice: The juxtaposition to the academic apartheid surrounding higher order thinking. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 29(6), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458918820729
Bigirwa, J. P., Ndawula, S., & Naluwemba, E. F. (2020). On-line quality management a precursor for improving e-learning adoption in midwifery schools in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.2.271
Bilasa, P., & Taspinar, M. (2020). Opinions of the students from foreign language teaching departments about their undergraduate programs. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(2), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.2.367
Bodzin, A., Hammond, T., Fu, Q., & Farina, W. (2020). Development of instruments to assess students’ spatial learning attitudes (SLA) and interest in science, technology and geospatial technology (STEM-GEO). International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.67
Brown, A., Nidumolu, A., McConnell, M., Hecker, K., & Grierson, L. (2019). Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to measure knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards quality improvement in health professions education: the beliefs, attitudes, skills, and confidence in quality improvement (BASIC-QI) scale. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0511-8
Chanlin, L. J., Lin, H. Y., & Lu, T. H. (2016). College students’ engagement in e-tutoring children in remote areas. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(5), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1015593
Cronje, A., Beer, J. D., & Ankiewicz, P. (2015). The development and use of an instrument to investigate science teachers’ views on indigenous knowledge. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2015.1108567
Derevenskaia, O. (2014). Active learning methods in environmental education of students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.086
Deschryver, M. (2017). Using the web as a higher order thinking partner: Case study of an advanced learner creatively synthesizing knowledge on the web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 240–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116667356
Dubas, J. M., & Toledo, S. A. (2016). Taking higher order thinking seriously: Using Marzano’s taxonomy in the economics classroom. International Review of Economics Education, 21, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.10.005
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Erduran, S. (2020). Science education in the era of a pandemic: How can history, philosophy and sociology of science contribute to education for understanding and solving the COVID-19 crisis? Science & Education, 29, 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00122-w
Garcia, L. C. (2015). Environmental science issues for higher-order thinking skills (hots) development: A case study in the Philippines. In Biology Education and Research in a Changing Planet (pp. 45–54). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-524-2
Gil-Glazer, Y., Walter, O., & Eilam, B. (2019). Photolingo-development and improvement of higher-order thinking and language skills through photographs. Journal of Education, 199(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057419843523
Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning-what we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031
Hunaepi, H., Dewi, I. N., & Sumarjan, S. (2019). Profiling students’ environmental care attitudes taught using Sasak Tribe local wisdom-integrated model. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education / Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(3), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.10009
Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018). OIDDE learning model: Improving higher order thinking skills of biology teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11217a
Ichsan, I. Z., Rahmayanti, H., Purwanto, A., Sigit, D. V., Singh, C. K. S., & Babu, R. U. M. (2020). HOTS-AEP-COVID-19: Students knowledge and digital worksheet of ILMIZI environmental learning model. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6), 5231–5241.
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Setiawan, R., & Megawati, I. (2020). Developing of computerized adaptive testing to measure physics higher order thinking skills of senior high school students and its feasibility of use. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.91
Ito, H., & Kawazoe, N. (2015). Active learning for creating innovators: Employability skills beyond industrial needs. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p81
Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching students to learn and to work well with 21st century skills: unpacking the career and life skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p1
Lee, A. Y. L. (2016). Media education in the school 2.0 era: Teaching media literacy through laptop computers and iPads. Global Media and China, 1(4), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416667129
Lindfors, E., & Hilmola, A. (2016). Innovation learning in comprehensive education?. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9311-6
Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2006). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.
Nabilah, S., Anwar, Y., & Riyanto, R. (2019). Motoric mechanism with problem-based learning: Impact on students’ higher-order thinking skills. Biosphere: Journal of Biology Education/ Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.182-193
Puran, R., Behzadi, M. H., Shahvarani, A., & Lotfi, F. H. (2017). The effects of training and other factors on problem solving in students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(3), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.3.448
Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., Oktaviani, V., Syani, Y., Hadi, W., & Marhento, G. (2020). Environmental attitude for smart city technology: Need assessment to develop smart trash in environmental education. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 8374–8383.
Ramadhan, S., Mardapi, D., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Utomo, H. B. (2019). The development of an instrument to measure the higher order thinking skill in physics. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.743
Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2006). Evaluasi hasil belajar yang relevan dengan kurikulum berbasis kompetensi [Evaluation of learning outcomes that are relevant to the competency-based curriculum]. Unesa University Press.
Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. (2018). The Internet explosion, digital media principles and implications to communicate effectively in the digital space. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018754361
Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. C. (2019). A framework for digital media literacies for teaching and learning in higher education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018784952
Saido, G. A. M., Siraj, S., Dewitt, D., & Al-Amedy, O. S. (2018). Development of an instructional model for higher order thinking in science among secondary school students: A fuzzy delphi approach. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1452307
Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, S., Rinanto, Y., Afandi, A., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using stimulating higher order thinking skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a
Seechaliao, T. (2017). Instructional strategies to support creativity and innovation in education. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p201
Sener, N., Turk, C., & Tas, E. (2015). Improving science attitude and creative thinking through science education project: A design, implementation and assessment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.771
Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Komala, R., Suryanda, A., Ichsan, I. Z., & Fadrikal, R. (2020). EECN: Analysis, potency, benefit for students knowledge and attitude to conserve mangroves and coral reefs. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1318a
So, W. W. M., Chen, Y., & Wan, Z. H. (2019). Multimedia e-learning and self-regulated science learning: A study of primary school learners’ experiences and perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09782-y
Tian, S., Hu, N., Lou, J., Chen, K., Kang, X., Xiang, Z., Chen, H., Wang, D., Liu, N., Liu, D., Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Li, J., Lian, H., Niu, S., Zhang, L., & Zhang, J. (2020). Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing. Journal of Infection, 80(4), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.018
Tsai, M. H., Wen, M. C., Chang, Y. L., & Kang, S. C. (2015). Game-based education for disaster prevention. AI and Society, 30(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0562-7
Uzun, N. (2012). A sample of active learning application in science education: The thema “cell” with educational games. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2932–2936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.592
Vidergor, H. E. (2018). Effectiveness of the multidimensional curriculum model in developing higher-order thinking skills in elementary and secondary students. The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1318771
Zhou, G., Chen, S., & Chen, Z. (2020). Back to the spring of Wuhan: Facts and hope of COVID-19 outbreak. Frontiers of Medicine, 14, 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0758-9