logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
angle and triangle cause common errors misconception correction

Identifying and Correcting Students’ Misconceptions in Defining Angle and Triangle

Kusno , Sutarto

Misconceptions are one of the biggest obstacles in learning mathematics. This study aimed to investigate students’ common errors and misundersta.

M

Misconceptions are one of the biggest obstacles in learning mathematics. This study aimed to investigate students’ common errors and misunderstandings they cause when defining the angle and the triangle. In addition, we investigated the metacognition/ drawing/ writing/ intervention (MDWI) strategy to change students’ understanding of the wrong concepts to the correct ones. A research design was used to achieve this goal. It identified and solved the errors in the definition of angle and triangle among first-year students in the Department of Mathematics Education at an excellent private college in Mataram, Indonesia. The steps were as follows: A test instrument with open-ended questions and in-depth interviews were used to identify the errors, causes, and reasons for the students’ misconceptions. Then, the MDWI approach was used to identify a way to correct these errors. It was found that students generally failed in interpreting the concept images, reasoning, and knowledge connection needed to define angles and triangles. The MDWI approach eliminated the misconceptions in generalization, errors in concept images, and incompetence in linking geometry features.

Keywords: Angle and triangle, cause, common errors, misconception correction.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
738
Download
581
Citations
Crossref
2

Scopus
0

References

Alamian, V., Zamani, A., & Habibi, M. (2020). The role of Schoenfeld’s Control Factor in reducing the tenth grade math students’ misconceptions in geometry. Journal of Organizational Behavior Research, 5, 1-11. https://bit.ly/3tCr8dh

Al-Khateeb, M. A. (2016). The extent of mathematics teacher’s awareness of their students’ misconceptions in learning geometry al concepts in the intermediate education stage. European Scientific Journal, 12(31), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n31p357

Artzt, A. F., & Thomas, E. A. (1998). Mathematics teaching as problem solving: A framework for studying teacher metacognition underlying instructional practice in mathematics. Instructional Science, 26(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003083812378

Ay, Y. (2017). A review of research on the misconceptions in mathematics education. In M. Shelley & M. Pehlivan (Eds.), Education Research Highlights in Mathematics, Science and Technology (pp. 21-31). ISRES Publishing. https://bit.ly/3xxdpGE

Barbara, K., Denise, R., & Mercedes, G. (2016). Promoting student buy-in: Using writing to develop mathematical understanding. Georgia Educational Researcher, 13(2), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2016.130202

Battista, M. T., Clements, D. H., & Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Research into practice: Using spatial imagery in reasoning. The Arithmetic Teacher, 39(3), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.39.3.0018   

Biber, Ç., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eighth grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9387

Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61-82). Erlbaum. https://bit.ly/3apeHe2

Chi, M. T. H. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and the learning outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 49-70). Routledge Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch3   

Cirillo, M., & Hummer, J. (2019). Addressing misconceptions in secondary geometry proof. Mathematics Teacher, 112(6), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.112.6.0410 

Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.

Cunningham, R. F., & Roberts, A. (2010). Reducing the mismatch of geometry concept definitions and concept images held by pre-service teachers. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1, 1-17. https://bit.ly/3MpE4ty

Freeman, B., Higgins, K. N., & Horney, M. (2016). How students communicate mathematical ideas: An examination of multimodal writing using digital technologies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 281-313. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6178

Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2010). To see or not to see: Analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2),163-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10649-010-9232-Y

Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K., Jr. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/748391

Gurel, D. K., & Eryılmaz, A. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Gutiérrez, A., & Jaime, A. (1999). Preservice primary teachers’ understanding of the concept of altitude of triangle. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 253-275. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009900719800

Herholdt, R., & Sapire, I. (2014). An error analysis in the early grades mathematics – A learning opportunity? South African Journal of Childhood Education, 4(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v4i1.46

Hogue, M. D., & Scarcelli, D. (2020). Mathematical misconceptions: Exploring the teaching and learning of tangent lines. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 86, 11-21. https://bit.ly/3NVq8si

Hughes, S., Lyddy, F., & Lambe, S. (2013). Misconceptions about psychological science: A review. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20

Junus, K. (2018). Assessing students’ mathematical misconceptions through concept maps and online discussion transcripts: Inner product spaces. In M. M. T. Rodrigo, J.-C. Yang, L-H. Wong & M. Chang (Eds.), ICCE 2018 - 26th International Conference on Computers in Education, Main Conference Proceedings (pp. 772-777). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

Kabaca, T., Karadag, Z., & Aktumen, M. (2011). Misconception, cognitive conflict and conceptual changes in geometry: A case study with pre-service teachers. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 1(2), 44-55. https://www.oalib.com/paper/2440534

Kamid, Anwar, K., Syaiful, Sofnidar, Liani, L., & Kurniawan, K. (2020). Investigation into first-year college students' misconceptions about limit concept: A case study based on cognitive style. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1445-1452. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080437

Karpuz, Y., & Güven, B. (2022). Are 9th grade students ready to engage in the theoretical discursive process in geometry? Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 1-4. https://bit.ly/3OlQHHt   

Kembitzky, K. A. (2009). Addressing misconceptions in geometry through written error analyses [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University]. Ohio State University Electronic Theses & Dissertations Center. https://bit.ly/3zhtIcc

Kim, J. S. (2011). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of content and students in geometry [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia]. UGA Libraries. https://bit.ly/3HLsok8  

Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2004). Ability and critical thinking as predictors of change in students’ psychological misconceptions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(4), 297-303. https://bit.ly/3xAsQ0T

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (2009). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121

Lemke, M., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Partelow, L., Miller, D., Williams, T., Kastberg, D., & Jocelyn, L. (2004). International outcomes of learning in mathematics literacy and problem solving. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://bit.ly/3QwUPGe

Limo´n, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2

Luneta, K. (2015). Understanding students’ misconceptions: An analysis of final Grade 12 examination questions in geometry. Pythagoras, 36(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v36i1.261

Magiera, M. T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2011). Characterizations of social-based and self-based contexts associated with students’ awareness, evaluation, and regulation of their thinking during small-group mathematical modeling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(5), 486-520. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0486

Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. (2019). National achievements for the school year 2019. Educational Assessment Center. https://bit.ly/3bkh0iX

Nahmias, E., & Teicher, M. (2021). Incorporating a metacognitive learning model to improve geometric thinking in high-school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(5), 102-108. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n5p102

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016). Program for international student assesment (PISA) results from PISA 2015. https://bit.ly/3b7F9Jg  

Özerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557

Ozkan, A., Ozkan, E. M., & Karapıcak, S. (2018). On the misconceptions of 10th grade students about analytical geometry. The Educational Review, USA, 2(8), 417-426. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2018.08.002

Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (2010). Visualization in mathematics. reading and science education. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8816-1

Poon, K. K., & Leun, C. K. (2016). A study of geometry understanding via logical reasoning in Hong Kong. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 17(3), 93-123. https://bit.ly/39Ga9je  

Şahin, E. K., Gülkılık, H., & Uğurlu, H. H. (2020). The role of concept images in solving geometry word problems. Elementary Education Online, 19(3), 1321-1336. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.729658

Sarar, M. M. A., & Al-Migdady, A. M. (2014). The effect of using stepans’ model of conceptual change on the modification of altarnative mathematical concepts and the ability of solving mathematical problems of ninth grade students in Jordan. European Scientific Journal, 10(22), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n22p%25p

Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 247-260). Springer-Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_12

Taylor, A. K., & Kowalski, P. (2004). Naive psychological science: The prevalence, strength, and sources of misconceptions. The Psychological Record, 54, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395459

Ubi, E. E., Odiong, A. U., & Igiri, O. I. (2018). Geometry viewed as a difficult mathematics. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 3(11), 251-255. https://bit.ly/3NARQe2

Urquhart, V. (2009). Using writing in mathematics to deepen student learning. McREL International.

Verkade, H., Mulhern, T. D., Lodge, J. M., Elliott, K., Cropper, S., Rubinstein, B. I. P., Espiñosa, A., Livett, M., Dooley, L., Frankland, S., & Mulder, R. (2016). Misconceptions as a trigger for enhancing student learning in higher education (A handbook for educators). The University of Melbourne. https://bit.ly/3QECpTV  

Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (1980). Concept images and some common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometry concepts. In R. Karplus (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth International Conference for the Psychology of mathematics Education (pp. 177-184). Lawrence Hall of Science. University of California.

Wilson, B., & Nebraska, A. (2009). Action research project report. mathematical communication through written and oral expression. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska-Lincoln. https://bit.ly/3NQHUNg

Wonu, N., & Charles-Ogan, G. (2017). Metacognition and senior secondary students’ learning achievement in solid geometry. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 42(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V42P508

...