Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills via Semi Second Life
This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of virtual laboratory based on semi second life (s-SL) on higher order thinking skills of gene.
- Pub. date: January 15, 2021
- Pages: 261-274
- 420 Downloads
- 586 Views
- 2 Citations
This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of virtual laboratory based on semi second life (s-SL) on higher order thinking skills of general senior secondary school in chemistry learning process. The research design was adopted posttest-only design approach to a quasi-experimental. This study was conducted in the one of public general senior secondary school in 3T regions – Bangkalan City – one of the cities in East Java Province, Indonesia. There were 81 students in the grade 11 of natural science who involved in this study. The participants were divided into three groups, namely the students who did practical work by demonstration methods in chemistry real laboratory, the students who did practical work by experiment methods in virtual laboratory based on s-SL, and the students who did practical work by combination both of them (demonstration methods in chemistry real laboratory and experiment methods in virtual laboratory based on s-SL). The students in each group was tested by posttest of higher order thinking skills. The data was analysed with one-way ANOVA. The results of data analysis shows that there is a significance difference of each groups. Virtual laboratory based on s-SL has enough effect on the students’ higher order thinking skills.
Keywords: Chemical Equilibrium, higher order thinking skills, virtual laboratory, semi second life.
References
Ad’hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). Students’ analytical thinking skills and chemical literacy concerning chemical equilibrium. In Y. D. Jatmiko, R. Azrianingsih, M. A. Pamungkas, A. Safitri, & C. Karim (Eds.), The 8th Annual Basic Science International Conference: Coverage of Basic Sciences toward the World’s Sustainability Challanges (pp. 1-4). Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Brawijaya University. AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062824.
American Chemical Society. (2012). ACS guidelines and recommendations for the teaching of high school chemistry. American Chemical Society.
Amin, D. I., & Ikhsan, J. (2020). A need analysis to optimization computer laboratory in chemistry learning process according to chemistry teachers and natural science students in 3T regions. In A. Wiyarsi, Pujianto, N. A. Ariyanti, & M. Ibrahim (Eds.), The 5th International Seminar on Science Education (pp. 1-7). Graduate School of Yogyakarta State University. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012017.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom, ASCD.
Brown, A., & Sugar, W. (2009). Second life in education: The case of commercial online virtual reality applied to teaching and learning. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2(1-2), 107-115.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
Darrah, M., Humbert, R., Finstein, J., Simon, M., & Hopkins, J. (2014). Are virtual labs as effective as hands-on labs for undergraduate physics? A comparative study at two major universities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9513-9.
Demircioglu, G., & Yadigaroglu, M. (2011). The effect of laboratory method on high school students’ understanding of the reaction rate. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science, (Special Issue), 509-516.
Dominguez, J. C., Miranda, R., Gonzales, E. J., Oliet, M., & Alonso, M. V. (2018). A virtual lab as a complement to traditional hands-on labs: Characterization of an alkaline electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.03.002.
Ellizar, E., Putri, S. D., Azhar, M., & Hardeli, H. (2018). Developing a discovery learning module on chemical equilibrium to improve critical thinking skills of senior high school students. In Ramli, Yohandri, Festiyed, C. Wurster, R. Jaafar, & S. A. Bakar (Eds.), The 2018 International Conference on Research and Learning of Physics (pp. 1-8). Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padang State University. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012145.
Ghani, I. B. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Yahaya, N. A., & Surif, J. (2016). Enahncing students’ HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 849-874. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00120g
Hawkins, I., & Phelps, A. J. (2013). Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00070b
Herga, N. R., & Dinevski, D. (2012). Virtual laboratory in chemistry-experimental study of understanding, reproduction and application of acquired knowledge of subject’s chemical content. Organizacija [Organization], 3(44). https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-012-0011-7
Herga, N. R., Cagran, B., & Dinevski. D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3), 593-608. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a
Homack, S. R. (2001, February 1). Understanding what ANOVA post hoc tests are, really [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the southwest educational research association, New Orleans, LA.
Hussain, I., Suleman, Q., & Din, M. N. U. Din. (2017). Effects of information and communication technology (ICT) on students’ academic achievement and retention in chemistry at secondary level. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1058
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935-942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
Inman, C., Wright, V. H., & Hartman, J. A. (2010). Use od second life in K-12 and higher education: A review of research. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 44-63. https://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v9/n1/use-of-second-life-in-k-12-and-higher-education-a-review-of-research.html
Jagodzinski, P., & Wolski, R. (2015). Assessment of application technology of natural user interfaces in the creation of a virtual chemistry laboratory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9517-5
Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Misconceptions in rate of reaction and their impact on misconception in chemical equilibrium. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1405-1423. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1405
Karpudewan, M., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2015). Investigating high school students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium concepts. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(6), 845-863. https://10.12973/ijese.2015.280a
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Ministry of Education and Culture]. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37, Tahun 2018, tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah [Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37, 2018, about Amendments to the Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 24 of 2016 about Core Competencies and Basic Competencies of Lessons in the 2013 Curriculum in Primary and Secondary Education].
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Ministry of Education and Culture]. (2019). Tingkat kesulitan soal UN 2019 tidak berubah, ini komposisi soalnya [The difficulty level of the national test items 2019 has not changed, this is the composition of the items]. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2019/03/tingkat-kesulitan-soal-un-2019-tidak-berubah-ini-komposisi-soalnya.
Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Brooks/Cole.
Kirk, R. E. (2008). Statistics: An introduction (5th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.
Kirschner, P., & Huisman, W. (1998). Dry laboratories in science education; computer-based practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 665-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200605.
Krishnan, P. (2018). A review of the non-equivalent control group post-test-only design. Nurse Researcher, 26(2), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1582.
Latifah, Z., Ikhsan, J., & Sugiyarto, K. H. (2018). Effect of virtual chemistry laboratory toward cognitive learning achievement. In S. Handayani, E. Rohaeti, Suwardi, & C. Kusumawardhani (Eds.), International Conference of Chemistry 2018 (pp. 1-6). Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Yogyakarta State University. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1156/1/012034.
Luo, L. (2008). Reference service in second life: An overview. References Services Review, 36(3), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320810895378.
Malik, A., & Setiawan, A. (2015). The development of higher order thinking laboratory to improve transferable skills of students. In A. G. Abdullah, T. Aryanti, A. B. D. Nandiyanto, V. Adriany, & A. Aripin (Eds.), International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education (ICIEVE 2015) (pp. 36-40). Vocational Technology Education Study Programs, School of Postgraduates Studies, Indonesia Education University. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icieve-15.2016.9.
Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (2nd ed.). SAGE Publisher.
Nathaniel, O. A., Rose, O. N. M., Abubakar, A. S. (2016). The effect of combined virtual and real laboratories on students’ achievement in practical chemistry. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(3), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160403.11.
Ollino, M., Aldoney, A., Dominguez, A. M., & Merino, C. (2017). A new multimedia application for teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 364-374. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00113d.
Pusat Data dan Statistik Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Center for Educational and Cultural Data and Statistics]. (2018). Statistik SMA 2018/2019 [The Statistics of General Senior Secondary School year 2018/2019]. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Ministry of Education and Culture].
Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan [Educational Assessment Center]. (2018). Ringkasan eksekutif: Hasil ujian nasional 2018 masukan untuk pembelajaran di sekolah [Executive summary: National test results 2018 input for learning in theschools]. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Ministry of Education and Culture].
Rahayu, Rr. R. Y., & Sutrisno, H. (2019). The effect of chemistry learning based on analogy on higher order thinking skills of senior high school students in equilibrium concept. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(12), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2619248.
Ramadhan, M. F., & Irwanto. (2017). Using virtual labs to enhance students’ thinking abilities, skills, and scientific attitudes. In S. Irene, M. Hajaroh, Lismadiana, P. Y. Fauziah, S. Atun, R. Hidayah, Siswantoyo, S. Munadi, D. R. Suryo, N. Sugesti, A. Nuryanto, & Surono (Eds.), Conference Proceedings: The 5th International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation (ICERI) 2017 (pp. 494-499). Yogyakarta State University.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Review: Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001.
Rizki, Y., Simorangkir, M., & Addyanto (2018). The influence of virtual chemistry laboratory media on students’ understanding of submicroscopic level and student activity grade xi. In B. Sinaga, R. Husein, & J. Rajagukguk (Eds.), The 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018) (pp. 520-524). Postgraduate School, Medan State University. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.112.
Salt, B., Atkins, C., & Blackall, L. (2008). Engaging with second life: real education in a virtual world literature review. Slenz Project.
Simon, N. (2014). Improving higher-order learning and critical thinking skills using virtual and simulated science laboratory experiments. In K. Elleithy & T. Sobh (Eds.), New Trends in Networking Computing, E-Learning, Systems Sciences, and Engineering (pp. 187-192). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06764-3_24.
Solikhin, F., Ikhsan, J., & Sugiyarto, K. H. (2019a). A need analysis in developing virtual laboratory according to the chemistry teachers. In S. Handayani, E. Rohaeti, Suwardi, & C. Kusumawardhani (Eds.), International Conference of Chemistry 2018 (pp. 1-5). Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Yogyakarta State University. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1156/1/012020.
Solikhin, F., Sugiyarto. K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2019b). The impact of virtual laboratory integrated into hybrid learning use on students’ achievement. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun [Peuradeun Scientific Journal], 7(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i1.268.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan Rasch pada asesmen pendidikan [Application of Rasch Model in Educational Assessment]. Trim Komunikata.
Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of virtual chemistry laboratory on students’ achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 159-170.
Wang, F., & Burton, J. K. (2012). Second life in education: A review of publications from its launch to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01334.x.
Whitten, K. W., Davis, R. E., Peck, M. L., & Stanley, G. G. (2010). Chemistry (9th ed.). Brooks/Cole.
Winkelmann, K. (2013). Virtual worlds and their uses in chemical education. In J. P. Suits & M. J. Sanger (Eds.), Pedagogic Roles of Animations and Simulations in Chemistry Courses (pp. 161-179). https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2013-1142.ch007.
Winkelmann, K., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Fowler, D., & Macik, M. (2017). Development, implementation, and assessment of general chemistry lab experiments performed in the virtual world of second life. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 849-858. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00733.
Younis, B. K. (2017). The effect of scientific inquiry simulations on students’ higher order thinking skills of chemical reaction and attitude towards chemistry. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 1158-1161. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-11-7.
Yulianti, D., Khanafiyah, S., & Sugiyanto. (2012). Penerapan virtual reality berbasis inkuiri untuk mengembangkan kemandirian mahasiswa [Implementation of virtual reality based on inquiry to develop autonomy of college students]. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia [Physics Education Journal of Indonesia], 8(1), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v8i2.2152.
Zumdahl, S. S., & Zumdahl, S. A. (2010). Chemistry (9th ed.). Brooks/Cole.