logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
learning products educational software technological training cognitive categories

Learning Supported by Technology: Effectiveness with Educational Software

Sharon Tzur , Adi Katz , Nitza Davidovich

This study addresses the effectiveness of learning via educational software. Recent decades have seen the integration of technologies, which are chang.

T

This study addresses the effectiveness of learning via educational software. Recent decades have seen the integration of technologies, which are changing teaching and transforming teachers into mediating, facilitating, and guiding figures by means of digital learning methods that serve as a major tool in schools, colleges, and universities. The current study focuses on instruction provided within the Israeli Air Force and examined the effectiveness of instruction provided via educational software in terms of learning products: Bloom’s revised taxonomy, Te’eni’s affective-cognitive model of organizational communication and the STEM model. We randomly divided the learners into three groups who studied the same topic: one group studied with the educational software only, the second with the educational software together with an instructor, and the third with an instructor who used a presentation. The learners took a test and four months later they took another test to examine the effectiveness of the instruction over time. The research results show that the recall levels and performance levels on the tests were almost identical in all groups, but in the categories of understanding and applying the addition of an instructor strongly contributed to achievements: Those who received instruction via educational software achieved the best results in the understanding category, while those who studied with an instructor who used a presentation achieved the best results on the test with regard to application of the studied material. The findings of this study can illuminate the effectiveness of using educational software in learning processes in all educational systems.

Keywords: Learning products, educational software, technological training, cognitive categories.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
961
Download
576
Citations
Crossref
3

Scopus
7

References

Babiker, M., & Elmagzoub, A. (2015). For effective use of multimedia in education, teachers must develop their own educational multimedia applications. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology14(4), 62-68.

Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. Routledge.

Ben-Zadok, G., Herskovits, A., & Nachmias, R. (2009). Examining online learning processes based on log files analysis: A case study. In A. Mendez-Vilas (Ed.), Research, reflections and innovations in integrating ICT in education (pp. 55-59). Formatex.

Chang, C. C., Liang, C., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior71, 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.031

Cicognani, A. (2000). Concept mapping as a collaborative tool for enhanced online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 150-158.

Coomans, S., & Lacerda, G. S. (2015). Petese, a pedagogical ergonomic tool for educational software evaluation. Procedia Manufacturing3, 5881-5888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.895  

Cotton, K. (2008). Computer‐assisted instruction. In Encyclopedia of Special Education (pp. 514-520). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470373699.speced0481

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983). Information richness: A new approach to manage information processing and organizational design. Department of Management Texas A&M University. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA128980.pdf

Davidovich, N., & Shiler, Z. (2016). Skill-based teaching for undergraduate STEM majors. American Journal of Engineering Education 7(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v7i1.9683

De-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., & Pagés, C. (2014). An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers & Education75, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.012 

Draper, S. (1996). Observing, measuring, or evaluating courseware: A conceptual introduction. CiteSeerX. https://cutt.ly/PmqBOh6  

Hwang, G. J., Spikol, D., & Li, K. C. (2018). Guest editorial: Trends and research issues of learning analytics and educational big data. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 134-136.

Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert Scales: How to (ab)Use Them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217-1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x  

Joubert, M. (2013). Using digital technologies in mathematics teaching: Developing an understanding of the landscape using three "grand challenge" themes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2) ,341-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9430-x

Kennedy, D. M., & McNaught, C. (1997). Design elements for interactive multimedia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology13(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1916

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Kruse, K., & Keil, J. (2000). Technology-based training: The art and science of design, development, and delivery. Jossey-Bass.

Kuzon, W. M., Urbanchek, M. G., & McCabe, S. (1996). The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37(1), 265–272.

Laborde, C., & Straesser, R. (2010). Place and use of new technology in the teaching of mathematics: ICMI activities in the past 25 years. Mathematics Education, 42(1), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0219-z

Lê, Q., & Lê, T. (2007). Evaluation of educational software: Theory into practice. Technology and teaching11,115-124.

Ma, J., Han, X., Yang, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The Internet and Higher Education24, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.005

Melamed, U. (2013). Implementing information skills as a route to significant learning. Mofet Institute. [in Hebrew]

Nachmias, R., & Mioduser, D. (2001). Integrating the Internet in education. Eureka, 14, 6-16. Melamed, U. (2013). Implementing information skills as a route to significant learning. [in Hebrew]

Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and teacher education17(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00036-6

Norman, G. (2010). Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws” of Statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

Pauline-Graf, D., & Mandel, S. E. (2019). Defining Preliminary Research for Digital Game-Based Learning Evaluation: Best Practices. International Journal of Educational Methodology5(4), 623-635.

Rappel, L. (2017). Self-firection in on-line learning. Journal of Educational System, 1(4), 6–14.

Ross, M., Perkins, H., & Bodey, K. (2016). Academic motivation and information literacy self-efficacy: The importance of a simple desire to know. Library & Information Science Research38(1), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.01.002

Rotem, A., & Peled, Y. (2008). School turns on-line. Mofet Institute. [in Hebrew]

Sahin, M. C. (2009). Instructional design principles for 21st century learning skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences1(1), 1464-1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.25

Schmeeckle, M. (2003). Online training: An evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of training law enforcement personnel over the Internet. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 205-260. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025028806189

Squires, D., & Preece, J. (1999). Predicting quality in educational software. Interacting with computers11(5), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00063-0

Stoddart, T., & Niederhauser, D. (1993). Technology and educational change. Computers in the Schools9(2-3), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v09n02_02

Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Te’eni, D. (2001). A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. Bar-Ilan University.

Waldman, N. (2007). Only the enthusiasts hold the baton – Is that so? Teacher-teachers eager to improve teaching with the help of the computer. In college, 19 ,403-415. [in Hebrew]

Weiser, O., Blau, I., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2016). Synchronous face-to-face learning and in one- and two-way videoconferencing: The role of pedagogy media, personality factors, and level of media naturalness. Open University. [in Hebrew]

...