logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
impact misconception rate of reaction chemical equilibrium

Misconceptions in Rate of Reaction and their Impact on Misconceptions in Chemical Equilibrium

Jusniar Jusniar , Effendy Effendy , Endang Budiasih , Sutrisno Sutrisno

Descriptive correlational research was conducted to discover misconceptions on Rate of Reaction (RR) that impact on Chemical Equilibrium (CE) misconce.

D

Descriptive correlational research was conducted to discover misconceptions on Rate of Reaction (RR) that impact on Chemical Equilibrium (CE) misconceptions. This research was conducted to 245 eleventh-grade students of High School in Gowa, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, that have been studied the RR and CE topics. Misconceptions data were collected using three-tier tests and semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using descriptive and correlational analysis. Description of RR misconceptions that impact on CE misconceptions are determined with the percentage of students who consistently experience misconceptions about RR and CE. There were six misconceptions in RR that have an impact on CE, which are: Misconceptions related to changes in the reaction rate with time; The effect of temperature on the rate of reaction; The effect of adding catalysts to the activation energy; and the mathematical affect relating to the rate of reaction and number of moles. Misconceptions in RR and CE have 0.39 correlation coefficient, based on Spearman's formula. These results indicate that the impact of misconception in RR on CE is moderate. This study suggests that education practitioners should eliminate the misconception of prerequisite concepts before teaching the next related concepts.

Keywords: Impact, misconception, rate of reaction, chemical equilibrium.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
2493
Download
1564
Citations
Crossref
10

Scopus
6

References

Al-Balushi, S. M., Ambusaidi, A. K., Al-Shuaili, A. H., & Taylor, N. (2012). Omani twelfth grade students’ most common misconceptions in chemistry. Science Education International, 23(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.478.

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., & Dipietro, M. (2010.). How learning works. Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey Bass Willey Imprint.

Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680618.

Atasoy, B., Akkus, H., & Kadayifci, H.  (2009). The effect of the conceptual change approach on an understanding of student chemical equilibrium concept. Research in Science and Technology Education, 27(3), 267-282. doi.org/10.1080/02635140903162587.

Banerjee, A. C. (1991). Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130411

Barke, H. -D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, D. (2009). Chemical Equilibrium. In Misconceptions in Chemistry (pp. 145-172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70989-3_7

Bilgin, I., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2003). Student’s misconceptions on the concept of chemical equilibrium. Education and Science, 28(127), 10–17.

Bodner, G.M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 873-878. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed063p873

Burdge, J., & Overby, J. (2017). Chemistry atom (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill.

Cakmakci, G. (2010). Identifying alternative conceptions of chemical kinetics among secondary school and undergraduate students in Turkey. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8001336

Canpolat, N., Pinarbasi, T., Bayracheken, S., & Geban, O. (2006). The conceptual change approach to teaching chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research Science Teaching Education, 24(2), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140600811619.

Carey, S. (2000). Science education as conceptual change. Journal of  Applied Development Psychology, 21(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0193-3973(99)00046-5

Cook, M, Wiebe, E.N., & Carter, G. (2008). The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic molecular representations. Science Education, 92, 848-867. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20262

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Demircioglu, G., Ayas, A., & Demircioglu, H. (2005). Conceptual change is achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases.  Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/b4rp90003k

Dhindsa, H. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Prospective pedagogy for teaching chemical bonding for smart and sustainable learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00059e.

Driel, J.H. Van. (2002). Students’ corpuscular conceptions in the context of chemical equilibrium and chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research Practice Europa, 3(2), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1039/b2rp90016e

Durmaz, M. (2018). Determination of prospective chemistry teachers’ cognitive structures and misconceptions about stereochemistry. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i9.3353

Effendy. (2002). Upaya untuk mengatasi kesalahan konsep dalam pengajaran kimia dengan menggunakan strategi konflik kognitif [Efforts to overcome misconceptions in chemistry teaching by using cognitive conflict strategies]. Chemical Communication Media/ Media Komunikasi Kimia, 6(2), 1-22.

Erman, E. (2017). Factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in learning covalent bonds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21375

Eymur, G., & Geban, O. (2017). The collaboration of cooperative learning and conceptual change: Enhancing the students’ understanding of chemical bonding concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9716-z

Ganasen, S., & Shamuganathan, S. (2017). The Effectiveness of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulations in Enhancing Matriculation Students’ Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium and Remediating Their Misconceptions. In M. Karpudewan, A. Md Zain & A. Chandrasegaran (Eds.), Overcoming Students' Misconceptions in Science (pp. 157-175). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4_9

Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Student alternative conception in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560050.

Gorodetsky, M., & Gussarsky, E. (1986). Misconceptualization of the chemical equilibrium concept as revealed by different evaluation methods. European Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528860080409.

Gussarsky, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (1990). On the concept of "chemical equilibrium": The associative framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270303

Habiddin & Page, E. M. (2019). Development and validation of a four-tier diagnostic instrument for chemical kinetics (FTDICK ). Indonesia Journal of Chemistry, 19(3), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218.

Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1985). Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070211

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the certainty of the response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304

Horton, C. (2007). Students' alternative conception in chemistry. California Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 18-38.

Ilyas, A., & Saeed, M. (2018). Exploring teachers ’ understanding of misconceptions of secondary grade chemistry students. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subject in Education, 9(1), 3323–3328.

Johnstone, A.H. (2000). The teaching of chemistry logical or psychological. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1039/a9rp90001b

Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Developing a three-tier diagnostic instrument on chemical equilibrium (TT-DICE). Educacion Quimica, 31(3), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2020.3.72133

Karpudewan, M., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2015). Investigating high school students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium concepts. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(6), 845–863. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.280a

Kolomuç, A., & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ misconceptions concerning the concept of chemical reaction rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84-101.

Nakhleh, M. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry chemical misconceptions.  Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191.

Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates’ bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 707–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010025012.

Miller, M., & Romine, W. (2020). Assessing college students’ knowledge and misconceptions concerning the Ebola virus.  European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 579 - 602.

O’Connor, C. (2015). A practice-led approach to aligning learning theories with learning and teaching strategies in third level chemistry education. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 4(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7B42F

Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science : A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670406.

Ozmen, H. (2008). Determination of students’ alternative conceptions about chemical equilibrium: A review of research and the case of Turkey. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1039/B812411F

Papaphotis, G., & Tsaparlis, G. (2008). Conceptual versus algorithmic learning in high school chemistry: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts Part 2. Students’ common errors, misconceptions, and difficulties in understanding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(4), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1039/b818470b.

Piquette, J. S., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2005). Strategies reported used by instructors to address alternate student conceptions in chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1112–1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20091

Regan, A., Childs, P., & Hayes, S. (2011). The use of an intervention program to improve undergraduate students’ chemical knowledge and address their misconceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90027g

Sanger, M. J. (2005). Evaluating students’ conceptual understanding of balanced equations and stoichiometric ratios using a particulate drawing. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(1), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p131.

Seery, M. K. (2009). The role of prior knowledge and student aptitude in undergraduate performance in chemistry: A correlation-prediction study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1039/b914502h.

Sendur, G., Toprak, M., & Pekmez, E.S. (2011) How can secondary school perceive chemical equilibrium. New World Science Academic, 6(2), 1512-1531.

Shing, Y. L., & Brod, G. (2016). Effects of prior knowledge on memory: Implications for education. International Mind, Brain, and Educational Society, 10(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12110

Sozbilir, M., Pinarbasi, T., & Canpolat. (2010). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of chemical. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 6(2), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75232.

Stojanovska, M. I., Petrusevski, V. M., & Soptrajanov, B. T. (2012). Addressing students’ misconceptions concerning chemical reactions and symbolic representations. Chemistry Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 829–852.

Stojanovska, M. I., Petrusevski, V. M., & Soptrajanov, B.T. (2017). Study of the use of the three levels of thinking and representation contributions. Section of Natural, Mathematical and Biotechnical Sciences, 35(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.20903/csnmbs.masa.2014.35.1.52.

Taber, K.S. (2009). Challenging misconceptions in the chemistry classroom: Resources to support teachers. Education Quimica, 4, 13–20. https://doi.org/102436/20.2003.02.27.

Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet.” International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435.

Tyson, L., Treagust, D. F., & Bucat, R. B. (1999). The complexity of teaching and learning of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 554-558. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p554.

Voska, K. W., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2000). Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736

Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2013). Preservice chemistry teachers in action: An evaluation of attempts for changing high school students’ chemistry misconceptions into more scientific conceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2rp20109g

Yan, Y. K., & Subramaniam, R. (2016). Diagnostic appraisal of grade 12 students’ understanding of reaction kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1114-1126. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00168h

Yurdakal, I. H. (2019). Examination of correlation between attitude towards reading and perception of creative reading. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 443 - 452.

...