logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
english literature lectures feedback strategies indonesian university

‘Thank You Very Much’: Feedback Strategies in University English Literature Lecture Interaction

Akhyar Rido , Bagus Hary Prakoso , Heri Kuswoyo

Learning literature is considered challenging for university students, especially in Indonesia, as they must perform assigned tasks and communicate wi.

L

Learning literature is considered challenging for university students, especially in Indonesia, as they must perform assigned tasks and communicate with one another, in addition to receiving and transmitting comprehensible literature content knowledge from and to their lecturers. In many cases, students do not get sufficient feedback on what they are doing. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of feedback strategies by lecturers in English literature lectures in a higher learning institution in Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach, this study involved three lecturers of the English literature department. Meanwhile, data were collected through 300 minutes of video recordings of drama, literary criticism, and prose lectures. The results revealed that the lecturers generated both negative and positive feedback strategies during the lectures. In terms of negative feedback strategies, they criticized students’ responses. By contrast, in terms of positive feedback strategies, they accepted, appreciated, and praised as well as repeated and answered students’ responses. The results also indicated that the feedback strategies became effective tools to improve students’ language competence, literary knowledge, and participation. This study suggested that lecturers use more positive feedback followed by additional comments during lectures as these could foster students’ engagement and keep learning longer.

Keywords: English literature lectures, feedback strategies, Indonesian university.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
367
Download
366
Citations
Crossref
2

Scopus
1

References

Akbulut, H., & Vural, R. A. (2017). Drama in education as one of the opportunities of cross ‐cultural pedagogy. Drama Research: International Journal of Drama in Education, 8(1), 1–20. https://bit.ly/3zg2qD5

Akpinar, M. (2018). Feedback strategies which social sciences teachers give to their students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 1317–1327. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060623

Al-Bashir, M., Kabir, R., & Rahman, I. (2016). The value and effectiveness of feedback in improving students’ learning and professionalizing teaching in higher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 38–41. https://bit.ly/3GJPqHk

Angelianawati, L. (2019). Using drama in EFL classroom. Journal of English Teaching, 5(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v5i2.1066

Brouillette, L. (2012). Advancing the speaking and listening skills of K-2 English language learners through creative drama. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.8

Burnett, P. C., & Mandel, V. (2010). Praise and feedback in the primary classroom: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 10, 145–154. https://bit.ly/3mbVLlw

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dabiri, A. (2018). A critical discourse analysis on teachers’ verbal feedback patterns in EFL CLT classrooms. Journal of English Educators Society, 3(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v3i2.1262

Dahal, B. (2016). Teachers’ feedback strategies in students’ mathematical activities and their achievement. In R. Koul & Y. Rahmawati (Eds.), The Eighth International Conference on Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Education (pp. 47–54). Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

DuFon, M. A. (2002). Video recording in ethnographic SLA research: Some issues of validity in data collection. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 40–59. https://bit.ly/3xnpheF

Fard, S. F. (2016). A Short introduction to literary criticism. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3, 328–337. https://bit.ly/3NQnu71

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175–199). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gormally, C., Evans, M., & Brickman, P. (2014). Feedback about teaching in higher ed: Neglected opportunities to promote change. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0235

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Heyward, P. (2010). Emotional engagement through drama: Strategies to assist learning through role-play. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 197–203. https://bit.ly/3U4QsmF

Ibrahim Almohizea, N. (2018). An investigation of oral interaction in English as a foreign language classroom. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(3), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180603.11

Ilyas, H. P. (2016). Drama in the EFL classroom: Critical review of the literature. Journal of ELT Research, 1(2), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.22236/jer_Vol1Issue2.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamin. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Kuswoyo, H., Sujatna, E. T. S., Indrayani, L. M., & Rido, A. (2020). Schematic structure and lexico-grammatical features of aerospace engineering English lectures: A systemic functional linguistic approach. Asian EFL Journal, 27(46), 171–203. https://bit.ly/3MfRPLc

Kuswoyo, H., Sujatna, E. T. S., Indrayani, L. M., Rido, A., & Macdonald, D. (2021). ‘Let’s take a look...’: An investigation of directives as negotiating interpersonal meaning in engineering lectures. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 29(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.1.03

Kuswoyo, H., Sujatna, E. T. S., Rido, A., & Indrayani, L. M. (2020). Theme choice and thematic progression of discussion section in engineering English lectures. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 50, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452194

Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. https://doi.org/10/1017/S0272263199004027

Maison, Hidayat, M., Kurniawan, D. A., Yolviansyah, F., Sandra, R. O., & Iqbal, M. (2022). How critical thinking skills influence misconception in electric field. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.2.377  

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Muhsin, A. (2016). The effectiveness of positive feedback in teaching speaking skill. Lingua Cultura, 10(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i1.873

Nguyen, N. H. T., & Luu, N. T. T. (2022). Difficulties in listening of English-majored sophomores at Tay Do University in Vietnam. European Journal of English Language Studies, 2(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejels.2.1.17

Noor, N. M., Aman, I., Mustaffa, R., & Seong, T. K. (2010). Teacher’s verbal feedback on students’ response: A Malaysian ESL classroom discourse analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.054

Rahmat, A., & Munir, U. M. (2018). Teacher’s verbal feedback in the classroom interaction. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v2i1.632

Razavi, A., & Naghizadeh, M. (2014). Corrective feedback in speaking in relation to error types in Iranian EFL classrooms. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 1(1), 148–160. https://bit.ly/3GKOW3E

Rido, A. (2017). What do you see here from this picture?: Questioning strategies of master teachers in Indonesian vocational English classrooms. TEFLIN Journal, 28(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v28i2/193-211

Rido, A. (2018). Focus on teacher: Classroom interaction from different perspectives. In A. Rido, A. Y. Wahyudin, & I. Gulö (Eds.), An overview of current issues in literature, linguistics, and language teaching (pp. 1–12). Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia.

Rido, A., Ibrahim, N., & Nambiar, R. M. K. (2014). Investigating EFL master teacher’s classroom interaction strategies: A case study in Indonesian secondary vocational school. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.057

Rido, A., Kuswoyo, H., & Ayu, R. (2020). Interaction management strategies in English literature lectures in Indonesian university setting. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(2), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i2.286

Rido, A., Kuswoyo, H., & Nuansa, S. (2020). Questioning strategies in English literature lectures in an Indonesian university. Lingua Cultura, 14(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v14i2.6834

Rido, A., Kuswoyo, H., Suryaningsih, A. S., Nuansa, S., Ayu, R., & Arivia, R. P. (2021). Repair strategies in English literature lectures in a university in Indonesia, Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia. Teknosastik, 19(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v19i1

Shi, D. (2013). Teacher-student interaction in novel and poetry classrooms in the Hong Kong tertiary setting. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 1975–1982. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.11.1975-1982

Simpson, R., Lee, D., & Leicher, S. (2002). MICASE manual: The Michigan corpus of academic spoken English. English Language Institute, The University of Michigan. https://cutt.ly/gNNmDUY

Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. University Press.

Supakorn, S. (2020). A conversation analytic study of classroom interactional competence. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(2), 15–40.

Tabatabaei, O., & Banitalebi, A. (2011). Feedback strategies in foreign language reading classes. Asian Culture and History, 3(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v3n2p59

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826

Xuerong, F. (2012). Excellent English teachers’ classroom strategies: A case study of three college English teachers in China. Higher Education of Social Science, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/jm3s

 

...