The Effective Diffusion of Educational Robotics in Rural Areas: A Case Study in the Sakha Republic of Russia
The purpose of this study was to find the determinants of effective diffusion of educational robotics in rural areas. The study analysed the key compo.
- Pub. date: January 15, 2021
- Pages: 145-159
- 292 Downloads
- 436 Views
- 2 Citations
The purpose of this study was to find the determinants of effective diffusion of educational robotics in rural areas. The study analysed the key components, difficulties, and major lessons of the successful case of the remote northern region of Russia – Sakha Republic. The study used a mixed-method approach consisting of interviews, survey, literature analysis, and participants’ observation. In the survey participated 57 robotics teachers and 113 elementary, middle, and high school students of the Sakha Republic. From survey participants were randomly chosen 30 robotics teachers and 18 middle and high school students for the interview. The literature analysis explored reports and articles on the educational robotics activities in the Sakha Republic for the period of 2011-2018. Based on the findings, the study developed a process model with five principles and ten components that influenced educational robotics diffusion in the Sakha Republic. One of the main determinants of the model was a support system of public-private partnerships and a local community of educators. Another was the need to consider the local area’s constraints, possibilities, and culture when implementing any technology in the rural region's education. In the researched case two major determinants would not be possible and sustainable without strong leadership. The findings showed that strong local leadership could use knowledge of the local area to provide more appropriate solutions and could build the active support of the local community and public-private partnerships that would accelerate the diffusion of technology in the rural region's education.
Keywords: Educational robotics, innovation diffusion, rural education, ICT4D.
References
Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63–71.
Altakhayneh, B. (2020). The impact of using the LEGO education program on mathematics achievement of different levels of elementary students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 603-610.
Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: valuing local knowledge. Theory into Practice, 52(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743769.
Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245.
Carr Jr, V. H. (1999). Technology adoption and diffusion. The Learning Center for Interactive Technology. https://shorturl.at/aghCX
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Echazarra, A., & T. Radinger. (2019). Learning in rural schools: Insights from PISA, TALIS and the literature (OECD Education Working Papers No. 196). https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019.
Eguchi, A. (2017). Bringing Robotics in Classrooms. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Robotics in STEM Education (pp. 3–31). Springer Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_1.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Nelson, R. (2006). Network of innovation. The oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University.
Government of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). (2019). Science and education. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). https://sakha.gov.ru/nauka-i-obrazovanie
Gulbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A survey on ICT usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 37-51
ITU Telecommunication Development Sector. (2017) Final Report ITU-D Study Group Telecommunications/ICTs for rural and remote areas 6th Study Period 2014-2017. ITU. www.itu.int/ITU-D/study-groups
Kirikkaya, E. B., & Basaran, B. (2019). Investigation of the effect of the integration of Arduino to electrical experiments on students' attitudes towards technology and ICT by the mixed method. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 31-48.
Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2
McKenna, J., Smith, A., & Balasubramanian, R. (2018). Why Teach Robotics? Exploring the potential application off robotics in a classroom setting. Robomatter Inc.
Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J. -J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2316/ journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
North-Eastern Federal University. (2019). Small computer academy of the North-Eastern Federal University. https://www.s-vfu.ru/universitet/rukovodstvo-i-struktura/instituty/imi/small-academy-courses-lectures/1mka.php
Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010). Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 391–408.
Ospennikova, E.V., & Ershov, M. G. (2015). Образовательная робототехника как инновационная технология реализации политехнической направленности обучения физике в средней школе [Educational robotics as an innovative technology of realization of polytechnic approach of physics education in secondary school]. Pedagogical education in Russia/ Педагогическое образование в России, (3), 33-40.
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163–178.
Pillay, H. K., & Hearn, G. N. (2009). Public-private partnerships in ICT for education. In S. Akhtar & P. Arinto (Eds.), Digital Review of Asia Pacific 2009-2010 (pp. 75-87). SAGE Publications.
Ra, S., Chin, B., & Lim, C. P. (2016). A holistic approach towards Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for
Rahim, S., Tie, S., & Begum, A. (2014). Diffusion of ICT in rural areas community for socio-economic development under the platform of E-CLRC. In Information and Knowledge Management, 4(12), 191-205.
Rodríguez, A., & Nájera, R. (2015). Promoting STEM careers and ICT4D by using robotics to reduce the gender gap in a rural region. International Journal of Intelligent Computing Research, 6(3), 592–600. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijicr.2042.4655.2015.0074
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.
Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 59–69.
Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 88, 202–214.
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Illustrated ed.). Currency.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, (pp. 3-50). SAGE Publications, Inc.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2018). Positioning ICT in education to achieve the education 2030 agenda in Asia and the Pacific. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261661
Zuckerman, S. (2020). The role of rural school leaders in a school-community partnership. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 10(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2020.v10n1p73-91.