Research Article
Turkish Adaptation of Preschool Children’s Science Motivation Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Melek Merve Yilmaz , Ayperi Dikici Sigirtmac

440 544

Article Metrics

Views

 

440

Downloads

 

544

Citations

Crossref

0

Scopus

1


Yilmaz MM, Sigirtmac AD. Turkish adaptation of preschool children’s science motivation scale: a validity and reliability study. European J Ed Res. 2021;10(2):891-906. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.891
Yilmaz, M. M., & Sigirtmac, A. D. (2021). Turkish adaptation of preschool children’s science motivation scale: a validity and reliability study. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 891-906. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.891
Yilmaz Melek Merve, and Ayperi Dikici Sigirtmac. "Turkish Adaptation of Preschool Children’s Science Motivation Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study," European Journal of Educational Research 10, no. 2 (2021): 891-906. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.891
Yilmaz, MM & Sigirtmac, A 2021, 'Turkish adaptation of preschool children’s science motivation scale: a validity and reliability study', European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 891-906. Yilmaz, Melek Merve, and Ayperi Dikici Sigirtmac. "Turkish Adaptation of Preschool Children’s Science Motivation Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study." European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 2, 2021, pp. 891-906, https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.891.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to adapt Preschool Children’s Science Motivation Scale (PCSMS) developed by Oppermann et al. into Turkish and conduct the validity and reliability analyses. This scale is considered important in terms of evaluating the science motivation of preschool children through the science concepts they are familiar with, based on their daily life experiences. The research data were obtained from 303 children attending preschool education in central districts of Adana. The findings of exploratory factor analysis, a two-factor structure named self-confidence and enjoyment consist of 28 items was determined in accordance with the original structure of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that this two-factor structure showed good fit. Subsequently, the study proceeded to reliability analyses and Cronbach’s α and Composite Reliability values were calculated. In consequence of the study, it was seen that the original form of the scale and the goodness of fit and internal consistency values obtained within the scope of the adaptation form coincided. The findings of the study indicate that the Turkish version of the PCSMS is valid and reliable for Turkish preschoolers.

Keywords: Early childhood, science education, science motivation, preschool, scale adaptation.


References

Alabay, E., Yildirim Dogru, S. S., & Akman, B. (2020). Sciencestart!™ destekli bilim eğitim programının 60-72 aylık çocukların bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve bilimsel inanca ve yönelime etkisi [The effect of sciencestart!™ assisted science education program on 60-72 months old childrens’ scientific process skills and scientific]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education/ Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.16986/huje.2018037123

Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 719-747.

Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353

Aysu, B., & Aral, N. (2016). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin öğrenme merkezleri hakkındaki görüş ve uygulamalarının incelenmesi [An investigation of the preschool teachers’ views and practices on learning centers]. Kastamonu Education Journal/ Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi24(5), 2561-2574.

Baroody, A. E., & Diamond, K. E. (2013). Measures of preschool children’s interest and engagement in literacy activities: Examining gender differences and construct dimensions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.07.002

Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations toward family, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior62(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00037-4

Bentler, P.M. & Bonnet, D.C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.399

Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2002). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge.

Buyukozturk, S. (2009). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of statistical analysis for social sciences]. Pegem Akademi.

Buyuktaskapu Soydan, S. (2019). Okul öncesi eğitim etkinlik planlarının etkinlik çeşidi ve bireysel-küçük/ büyük grup olarak planlanması açısından incelenmesi [The analysis of activity plans of pre-school education in terms of kinds of activity and ways of practices (individual – small / large group)]. Kastamonu Education Journal/ Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(3), 1081-1092. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2585

Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Routledge.

Cokluk, O., Sekercioglu, G. & Buyukozturk, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli ı̇statistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. [Multivariable statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Pegem Akademi.

Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology55(4), 584-594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual review of psychology53(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Edens, K., & Potter, E. (2013). An exploratory look at the relationships among math skills, motivational factors and activity choice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0540-y

French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly19(1), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.004

Galton, M. (2009). Moving to secondary school: Initial encounters and their effects. Perspectives on Education, 2, 5–21.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson.

Gelman, S. A. (1999). Concept development in preschool children. Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education. American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://t.ly/nAUu

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E., (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Association of Test Publishers1(1), 1-13.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Issues, concepts, and applications (pp. 76-99). Sage.

Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163463

Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review32(2), 125-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.04.002

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika39(1), 31-36.

Kaya, C., & Altinkurt, Y. (2018). Role of psychological and structural empowerment in the relationship between teachers’ psychological capital and their levels of burnout. Education and Science43(193), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.6961

Kilis, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2018). Çevrimiçi öz-düzenleme ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Online self-regulation questionnaire: Validity and reliability study of Turkish translation]. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal/ Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(1), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.298791

Kizildag, S., & Yildirim, I. (2017). Developing the Spouse Emotional Jealousy Scale. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice/ Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri17(1), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.1.2441

Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Leibham, M. B., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2013). Science interests in preschool boys and girls: Relations to later self‐concept and science achievement. Science Education97(4), 574-593. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21066

Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2008). Young children’s motivational beliefs about learning science. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.04.001

Marsh, H.W., & Balla, J. (1994). Goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis: The effects of sample size and model parsimony. Quality & Quantity, 28, 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102761

Oppermann, E., Brunner, M., Eccles, J. S., & Anders, Y. (2018). Uncovering young children's motivational beliefs about learning science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching55(3), 399-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21424

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 166-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20276

Sackes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. L., & O'Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children's immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching48(2), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20395

Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). Beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Person Education.

Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology76(5), 637-643. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.637

Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Tanaka, J. S. (1987). "How big is big enough?": Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58(1), 134-146. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130296

Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E., Tabach, M., & Barkai, R. (2013). Exploring young children’s self-efficacy beliefs related to mathematical and nonmathematical tasks performed in kindergarten: Abused and neglected children and their peers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(2), 309–322. https://10.1007/s10649-012-9458-y

Valeski, T. N., & Stipek, D. J. (2001). Young children’s feelings about school. Child Development, 72(4), 1198–1213. https://10.1111/1467-8624.00342

Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching48(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20398

Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: A follow‐up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching49(9), 1057-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21049

Veneziano, L., & Hooper, J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 67-70.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Wigfield, A., & Tonks, S. (2002). Adolescents’ expectancies for success and achievement task values during middle and high school years. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 53 – 82). Information Age Publishing.

Yaslioglu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. [Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses]. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Busines/ İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi46(Special Issue), 74-85.