Design and Psychometric Properties of the Strategies for Meaningful Learnings Scale
In higher education, it is essential that students apply what they have learned to solve problems in their community. Meaningful learning is the main .
- Pub. date: July 15, 2022
- Pages: 1413-1425
- 181 Downloads
- 419 Views
- 0 Citations
In higher education, it is essential that students apply what they have learned to solve problems in their community. Meaningful learning is the main means to increase the accumulation of knowledge and achieve the transfer of learning, which is why the present study aimed to: design and evaluate the psychometric properties of a scale that measures the application of learning strategies that promote meaningful learning. The participants were 890 university students from Northeast Mexico, with an average age of 20.35 years (SD = 3.94). The sample was randomly divided into two: an exploratory factor analysis was carried out with the first sample and a confirmatory factor analysis was made in the second sample. The results obtained confirm the eight-dimensional structure, which showed an adequate fit to the data (χ2 / gl = 3.57, GFI = .96, AGFI = .95, NFI = .94, RMSEA = .08 and SRMR = .07), high parsimony (RP = .93), in addition to good internal consistency (ω ≥ .80) and convergent validity (AVE ≥ .40). In conclusion, the scale presents adequate psychometric properties to measure the frequency of use of strategies that promote meaningful learning in Mexican university students.
Keywords: Factor analysis, learning strategies, meaningful learning, reliability, validity.
References
American Psychological Association. (2016). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct with the 2016 amendment to standard 3.04. APA
Araujo, J., & Chadwick, C. (1993). Educational technology: Theories of instruction (2nd. ed.). Paidós.
Ausubel, D. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48(2), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543048002251
Ausubel, D. (2002). Adquisición y retención del conocimiento [Knowledge acquisition and retention]. Paidós.
Ausubel, D., Novak, J., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ausubel, D., Novak, J., & Hanesian, H. (1983). Educational psychology: A cognitive point of view (2nd ed.). Trillas.
Bishara, A. J., & Hittner, J. B. (2015). Reducing bias and error in the correlation coefficient due to nonnormality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(5), 785-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414557639
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
Cabrera, E. M., García, L. A., Torbay, A., & Rodríguez, T. (2007). Estructura factorial y fiabilidad de un cuestionario de estrategias de aprendizaje en universitarios: CEA-U [Factorial structure and reliability of a questionnaire of learning strategies in university students: CEA-U]. Annals of Psychology, 23(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps
Carretero-Dios, H., & Pérez, C. (2005). Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(3), 521-551. https://bit.ly/3MXehtp
Castañeda, M. (2004). Los medios de comunicación y la tecnología educativa [The media and educational technology]. Trillas.
Castellanos, S., Palacio, M. E., Cuesta, M., & García, E. (2011). Evaluation questionnaire for strategic information processing for university students (CPEI-U). Electronic Journal of Applied Methodology, 16(2), 15-28. https://bit.ly/3LxwHAy
Cheung, G. W., & Wang, C. (2017). Current approaches for assessing convergent and discriminant validity with SEM: Issues and solutions. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017(1), 12706. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.12706abstract
Cooper, J. D. (1990). How to improve reading skills. Visor.
De la Fuente Arias, J., & Justicia, F. J. (2003). Escala de estrategias de aprendizaje ACRA-Abreviada para alumnos universitarios [Abbreviated ACRA Scale learning strategies for university students]. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology/ Revista Electrónica de Investigación Psicoeducativa, 1(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.2.114
Díaz Barriga, F., & Hernández Rojas, G. (2002). Teaching strategies for meaningful learning. A constructivist interpretation (2nd. ed.). Mc Graw Hill.
Díaz Barriga, F., & Hernández Rojas, G. (2010). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo. Una interpretación constructivista [Teaching strategies for meaningful learning. A constructivist interpretation] (3rd ed.). Mc Graw Hill.
Edwards, A. L. (1983). Techniques of attitude scale construction. Media Inc.
Espíndola, J. (2000). Reingeniería educativa [Educational engineering]. Pax.
García, J. M. (2001). La Universidad en el comienzo de siglo: Una respuesta entre el pragmatismo y la utopía [The university at the beginning of the century: An answer among pragmatism and utopia]. Catarata.
Gargallo, B., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Pérez, C. (2009). El cuestionario CEVEAPEU. Un instrumento para la evaluación de las estrategias de aprendizaje de los estudiantes universitarios [CEVEAPEU Questionnaire. An instrument to evaluate learning strategies from university students] RELIEVE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 15(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.15.2.4156
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis multivariante [Multivariate analysis] (4th. ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hernández Rojas, G. (2006). Miradas constructivistas en psicología de la educación [Constructivist glances in educational psychology]. Paidós.
James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models and data. Sage.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
López-Aguado, M. (2010). Diseño y análisis del Cuestionario de Estrategias de Trabajo Autónomo (CETA) para estudiantes universitarios [Design and analysis from the autonomous learning strategies questionnaire]. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 15(1), 77-99. https://bit.ly/370x5bL
Mayer, R. E. (2000). Diseño educativo para un aprendizaje constructivista. [Educational design for constructivist learning] In M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Diseño de la instrucción: Teorías y modelos: Un nuevo paradigma de la teoría de la instrucción. Parte I [Instructions design: Theories and patterns: A new paradigm in instruction theory. Part I] (pp. 153-172). Santillana.
Méndez, L. M., & Peña, J. A. (2006). Manual Práctico para el diseño de la escala Likert [Practical manual about Liker scale design]. Trillas.
Montero, I., & León, O. (2005). Sistema de clasificación del método en los informes de investigación en psicología [Classification system from the method in reports about psychology research]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(1), 115-127. https://bit.ly/3rYbKqM
Moral, J. (2019). Revisión de los criterios para validez convergente estimada a través de la varianza media extraída [Criteria revision for convergent validity estimated through mean variance extracted]. Psychologia: Advances in Discipline/ Psychologia: Avances en la Disciplina, 13(2), 25-41. http://doi.org/10.21500/19002386.4119
Moses, T. (2017). Psychometric contributions: Focus on test scores. In R. E. Bennett & M. von Davier (Eds.), Advancing human assessment: The methodological, psychological and policy contributions of ETS (pp. 79-132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58689-2_3
Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrera, E. (2019). Diez pasos para construcción de un test. [Ten steps for test construction] Psicothema, 31(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1988). Aprendiendo a aprender [Learning to learn]. Martínez Roca.
Pimienta, J. (2007). Metodología constructivista: Guía para la planeación escolar [Constructivist methodology: A guide for school planning] (2nd. ed.). Pearson / Prentice Hall.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, A. F., García, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53, 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231
Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Annals of Psychology/ Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755-782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401