logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
mathematical ability problem solving working memory capacity

How Does Working Memory Capacity Affect Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving?

Deka Anjariyah , Dwi Juniati , Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono

Problem-solving process requires information processing, and the information processing is related to working memory capacity (WMC). This study aims t.

P

Problem-solving process requires information processing, and the information processing is related to working memory capacity (WMC). This study aims to determine the effect of WMC on students' mathematical abilities and to describe the ability of the students with high and low WMC in solving mathematical problems. This research used mixed method with Sequential Explanatory Design. The quantitative data were collected through the provision of OSPAN tasks and math tests to 58 students aged 15-17 years, while the qualitative data were collected through interviews based on mathematical problem-solving tasks. The results showed that WMC had a significant effect on students' mathematical abilities (R=0.536; p=0.000). Researchers found differences in students' mathematical problem-solving abilities with high and low WMC. Students with high WMC can remember and manage information well which supports the determination of more advanced problem-solving strategies and have better attention control so that they find varied appropriate solutions. Students with low WMC experienced decreased attention control as the complexity of the tasks increased, missed important information in problem solving strategies, and did not recheck their work, leading to wrong solution/answer. The mathematical performance of students with high WMC outperformed the mathematical performance of students with low WMC.

Keywords: Mathematical ability, problem solving, working memory capacity.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
777
Download
547
Citations
Crossref
5

Scopus
3

References

Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003

Alloway, T. P., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2011). The relationship between working memory, IQ, and mathematical skills in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.013

Anjariyah, D., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Critical thinking skill of high-performance mathematics teacher in solving mathematical problem. In R. Ekawati (Ed.), Proceedings of the Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2018) (pp. 138–141). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.34

Arum, D. P., Kusmayadi, T., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Students’ difficulties in probabilistic problem-solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012098

Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4

Barczi-Veres, K. (2022). Planning and delivering a cooperative maths lesson. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.3.1.9

Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00789.x

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Căprioară, D. (2015). Problem solving-purpose and means of learning mathematics in. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1859–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.332

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(5), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

DeCaro, M. S. (2018). When does higher working memory capacity help or hinder insight problem solving? In F. Vallee-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight: On the origins of new ideas (pp. 79-104). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268118-5

Firdaus, A. M., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2021). Investigating middle school students generalization of number pattern based on learning style. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 2624–2632. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.5709

Friso-Van Den Bos, I., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2013). Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 10, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.003

Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2020). Addressing the role of working memory in mathematical word-problem solving when designing intervention for struggling learners. ZDM, 52(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01070-8

Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2000). Working memory deficits in children with low achievements in the national curriculum at 7 years of age. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158047

Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6

Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 37-56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

Juniati, D., & Budayasa, I. K. (2020). Working memory capacity and mathematics anxiety of mathematics undergraduate students and its effect on mathematics achievement. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.653518

Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 336–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.336

Karsenty, R. (2014). Mathematical ability. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 494-497). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_94

Lestari, N. D. S., Juniati, D., & Suwarsono, S. (2019). The role of prospective mathematics teachers’ knowledge of content and students in integrating mathematical literacy. New Educational Review, 57(3), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2019.57.3.12

Mayfield, K. H., & Chase, P. N. (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-105

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publication, Inc.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158

Miller, H., & Bichsel, J. (2004). Anxiety, working memory, gender, and math performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(3), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.029

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM

Palengka, I., Juniati, D., & Abadi. (2021). Mathematical reasoning structure of junior high school students in solving problems based on their working memory capacity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012023

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princenton University Press.

Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005

Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141(2016), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.014

Siswono, T. Y. E., Kohar, A. W., Hartono, S., Rosyidi, A. H., Kurniasari, I., & Karim, K. (2019). Examining teacher mathematics-related beliefs and problem-solving knowledge for teaching: Evidence from Indonesian primary and secondary teachers. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(5), 493-506. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019553346

Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé-López, V. (2009). Working memory in science problem solving: A review of research. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 26(1), 79-90. https://bit.ly/3OLt6Ri

Stillman, G. (1996). Mathematical processing and cognitive demand in problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 8(2), 174–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217296

Tohir, M., Maswar, & Atikurrahman, M. (2020). Prospective teachers’ expectations of students’ mathematical thinking processes in solving problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1735–1748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1735

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5

Ünal, M. (2017). Preferences of teaching methods and techniques in mathematics with reasons. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050204

Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Heitz, R. P., Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17(6), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210902998047

Wang, Y., & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.003

Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012a). How working memory capacity affects problem solving. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 56, 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394393-4.00006-6

Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012b). Working memory capacity, attentional focus, and problem solving. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412447622

...