logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
attitude to arts measurement invariance ethnicity

Ethnic Differences in Students’ Attitudes to the Arts: Providing Validity Evidence to Make Comparisons

Mustafa Asil , Alison Gilmore , Haci Bayram Yilmaz

Previous research suggests that non-cognitive factors play an important role in promoting success at school and beyond, aligning with the multifaceted.

P

Previous research suggests that non-cognitive factors play an important role in promoting success at school and beyond, aligning with the multifaceted goals of education. Enhancing students’ attitudes to learning in school is expected to have positive impacts on various schooling outcomes. To date, very few studies have focused on measuring and understanding students’ attitude to the arts. This study aims to address a gap in current research in this area by introducing instruments designed to measure attitude to dance, drama, music and visual arts. Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance analyses are employed to examine the factorial validity and measurement equivalence of the scales of attitude to the arts disciplines for different ethnic groups in New Zealand. Findings support the utility of the scales as valid measures of attitude to dance, drama, music and visual arts. Noticeable differences are reported among New Zealand European, Maori, Pasifika and Asian students regarding their attitudes to dance, drama, music and visual arts.

Keywords: Attitude to arts, measurement invariance, ethnicity.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
360
Download
509
Citations
Crossref
2

Scopus
2

References

Aiken, L. R. (1970). Attitudes toward mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 40(4), 551–596.

Aiken, L. R. (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46(2), 293–311.

Aktas, M. C., & Tabak, S. (2018). Turkish adaptation of math and me survey: A Validity and reliability study. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.707

Asil, M., & Brown, G. T. (2016). Comparing OECD PISA reading in English to other languages: Identifying potential sources of non-invariance. International Journal of Testing, 16(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2015.1064431

Bauer, D. J. (2017). A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000077

Bertling, J. P., Borgonovi, F., & Almonte, D. E. (2016). Psychosocial skills in large-scale assessments: Trends, challenges, and policy implications. In A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century (pp. 347–372). Springer International Publishing.

Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Blatt-Gross, C. (2013). Toward meaningful education: Investigating artful behavior as a human proclivity in the classroom. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 14(7), 1–22.

Brown, A. T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.

Brown, G. T., Harris, L. R., O'Quin, C., & Lane, K. E. (2017). Using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate cross-cultural research: Identifying and understanding non-invariance. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(1) 66–90.

Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher's corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 471–492.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.

Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale.

de Eça, T. T., Milbrandt, M. K., Shin, R., & Hsieh, K. (2017). Visual arts education and the challenges of the millennium goals. In G. Barton & M. Baguley (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of global arts education (pp. 91–105). Palgrave Macmillan.

Ercikan, K., & Lyons-Thomas, J. (2013). Adapting tests for use in other languages and cultures. In K. Geisinger (Ed.), APA handbook testing and assessment in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 545–569). American Psychological Association.

Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1

Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(3), 509–529.

Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and          achievement/ performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123–142.

Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117–144.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

International Test Commission (ITC). (2016). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (Second edition). https://www.intestcom.org/page/16#:~:text=About%20the%20ITC%20Guidelines%20for,in%20testing%20technology%20and%20practices.

International Test Commission (ITC). (2017). The ITC guidelines for large-scale assessment of linguistically diverse populations. https://www.intestcom.org/page/31

Iwai, K. (2002). The contribution of arts education to children's lives. Prospects, 32(4), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022102017139

Kairavuori, S., & Sintonen, S. (2012). Arts education: Instruments of expression and communication. In H. Niemi, A. Toom & A. Kallioniemi, (Eds.), The Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 211–225). Sense Publishers.

Kayacan, K., & Sonmez Ektem, I. (2019). The effects of biology laboratory practices supported with self-regulated learning strategies on students' self-directed learning readiness and their attitudes towards science experiments. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 313–299. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.313

Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Lipnevich, A. A., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (2013). Assessing non-cognitive constructs in education: A review of traditional and innovative approaches. In D. H. Saklofske, V. L. Schwean, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment (pp. 750–772). Oxford University Press.

Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199–214.

Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Attitude toward self, social factors, and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 9(2), 89–120.

Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.

Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Learning Media.

Morris, J. W., & Stuckhardt, M. H. (1977). Art attitude: Conceptualization and implication, Studies in Art Education, 19(1), 21–28.

Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthen & Muthen.

National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement. (2017a). The arts 2015: Key findings (No. 10.1). Educational Assessment Research Unit & New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/nmssa/all-nmssa-publications

National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement. (2017b). Visual arts 2015: Key findings (No. 10.5). Educational Assessment Research Unit & New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/nmssa/all-nmssa-publications

National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement. (2017c). Music- Sound arts 2015: Key findings (No. 10.4). Educational Assessment Research Unit & New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/nmssa/all-nmssa-publications

National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement. (2017d). Dance 2015: Key findings (No. 10.2). Educational Assessment Research Unit & New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/nmssa/all-nmssa-publications

National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement. (2017e). Drama 2015: Key findings (No. 10.3). Educational Assessment Research Unit & New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/nmssa/all-nmssa-publications

National Monitoring Study of Student Achievement. (2017f). Technical information 2015 (No. 11). Educational Assessment Research Unit & New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/nmssa/all-nmssa-publications

Pavlou, V. & Kambouri, M. (2007). Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: An evaluation tool. Studies in Educational Evaluation33(3-4), 282–301.

Popham, W. J. (2005). Students' attitudes count. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 84-85.

Sass, D. A., Schmitt, T. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 167–180.

Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003

Silverman, S., & Subramaniam, P. R. (2000). Student attitude toward physical education and physical activity: A review of measurement issues and outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19(1), 97–125.

Slavin R. E. (1990). On making a difference. Educational Researcher, 19 (3), 30–44.

Smithrim, K. & Upitis, R. (2005). Learning through the arts: Lessons of engagement. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1 & 2), 109–127.

Sorbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27(2), 229–239.

Steinkamp, M. W., & Maehr, M. L. (1983). Affect, ability, and science achievement: A quantitative synthesis of correlational research. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 369–396.

Thompson, S., McDonald, F., Talakai, M., Taumoepeau, V., & Te Ava, A. (2009). Training manual for teachers working with Pacific students: Engaging Pacific learners. Ako Aotearoa. https://gifted.tki.org.nz/assets/Uploads/files/Training-manual-for-teaching-working-with-pacific-students-engaging-pacific-learners.pdf

Van de Vijver, F. J., Avvisati, F., Davidov, E., Eid, M., Fox, J. P., Le Donne, N., Lek, K., Meuleman, B., Paccagnella, M. & van de Schoot, R. (2019). Invariance analyses in large-scale studies, (No. 201). OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/254738dd-en.

Van de Vijver, F. J., & He, J. (2016). Bias assessment and prevention in noncognitive outcome measures in context assessments. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective (pp. 229–253). Springer International Publishing.

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.

Whitinui, P. (2008). Kapa Haka counts: Improving participation levels of Maori students in mainstream secondary schools. Mai Review, 3(8), 1–14.

Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.7275/mhqa-cd89

Xu, L., Diket, R., & Brewer, T. (2018). Predicting student performance via NAEP secondary art analysis using partial least squares SEM. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(4), 231–242.

Yurdakal, I. H. (2019). Examination of correlation between attitude towards reading and perception of creative reading. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.2.443

...