This study synthesizes academic literature on Internal Quality Assurance (IQA) and stakeholder engagement in higher education, focusing on systems operating beyond formal accreditation. Using a PRISMA-guided Systematic Literature Review (SLR), this research analyzed 22 studies published between 2010 and 2025 from four major databases (Scopus, Taylor & Francis, ScienceDirect, and ERIC) through thematic synthesis and bibliometric mapping. The findings reveal that IQA is conceptualized as an autonomous, improvement-focused system that fosters a quality culture through diverse models. Effective multi-stakeholder engagement, involving faculty, students, and staff, is identified as crucial for success. While challenges such as leadership and resource constraints exist, they can be overcome by enablers like strong leadership and participatory cultures. This review contributes uniquely by synthesizing IQA practices outside formal accreditation, emphasizing participatory engagement for developing an intrinsic quality culture, and highlighting emergent research from Global South contexts. The findings can inform policymakers, higher education leaders, and practitioners in creating effective IQA systems and guide future research.

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed higher education, creating both opportunities and challenges in cultivating students’ critical thinking skills. This study integrates quantitative bibliometric analysis and qualitative systematic literature review (SLR) to map global research trends and identify how critical thinking is conceptualized, constructed, and developed in the AI era. Scopus served as the primary data source, limited to publications from 2022 to 2024, retrieved on February 8, 2025. Bibliometric analysis using Biblioshiny R and VOSviewer followed five stages—design, data collection, analysis, visualization, and interpretation—while the SLR employed a deductive thematic approach consistent with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 322 documents were analyzed bibliometrically, and 34 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Results show that Education Sciences and Cogent Education are the most productive journals, whereas Education and Information Technologies have the highest citation impact. Several influential documents and authors have shaped global discussions on AI adoption in higher education and its relationship to critical thinking. Thematic mapping identified five major research clusters: pedagogical integration, ethical and evaluative practices, technical and application-oriented AI models, institutional accountability, and socio-technical systems thinking. Conceptually, critical thinking is understood as a reflective, evaluative, and metacognitive reasoning process grounded in intellectual autonomy and ethical judgment. Across the reviewed literature, strategies for fostering critical thinking converge into three integrated approaches: ethical curriculum integration, pedagogical and assessment redesign, and reflective human–AI collaboration. Collectively, these strategies ensure that AI strengthens rather than replaces human reasoning in higher education.

Learning to read constitutes one of the most important cognitive abilities students acquire during their education, and teachers’ knowledge of reading instruction is considered significant to teaching quality and students’ achievement. This paper aims to systematically review the existing research on teacher knowledge of reading instruction over the past six years, following the PRISMA statement’s guidelines, to identify the current research trends, areas of research, and research gaps. Three main research areas are identified in the 22 reviewed articles, namely (a) Teacher knowledge (TK) exploration, (b) TK assessment, and (c) TK development. More specifically, research on TK exploration includes sub-themes such as examining TK, investigating the relationship between TK and practice and student achievement, and influencing factors of TK. TK assessment includes research on the development and validation of more comprehensive measurement tools to assess teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of reading instruction. TK development involves the effectiveness of interventions on TK of reading instruction in teachers’ professional development programs. Future studies are recommended to use a more diverse range of methods, including both quantitative and qualitative approaches to study teachers’ knowledge in their classroom practice, and to focus on teachers’ active role as knowledge constructors. Studies in L2 reading contexts are also recommended.