Open schooling is a recent educational approach that has been recently introduced in European policies, so the literature on its transfer to the education system is still limited. The aim of this study is to configure an overview of how open schooling has been implemented in science education in terms of its definition, the topics addressed, the pedagogical aspects considered, and the benefits obtained for the teaching-learning processes. A systematic literature review was carried out using the PRISMA 2020 methodology, in which 27 documents published between 2015 and 2024 were analysed. Open schooling is defined mainly as an approach in which students, teachers, and other stakeholders, especially students’ families, collaborate to provide solutions to real-life issues in search of the community’s well-being. The open schooling experiences usually addressed environmental and health issues through scientific practices and contextualization mainly, developing activities of data collection, synthesis and analysis, dissemination, and information and communication technologies with the students. Companies and local businesses are the preferred stakeholders involved, followed by experts and researchers. Questionnaires are the preferred instruments for data collection, and the documents analysed report benefits for students’ learning and motivation and also for teachers and schools. 

Augmented Reality (AR) technology is emerging as a promising tool in education, offering immersive and interactive learning experiences that enhance students’ understanding of abstract scientific concepts. This quasi-experimental study investigated the impact of AR on student learning outcomes in chemistry topics, including acids, bases, pH, oxides, and salts, among lower secondary students in Vietnam. A total of 191 students participated in the study, divided into two groups: the experimental group (n = 94) received AR-integrated lessons. The control group (n = 97) received instruction through traditional methods, including lectures and discussions. Data were collected at three points: prior to the intervention (Test 0, baseline) to establish group equivalence; during the intervention (Test 1) to monitor interim changes; and after the intervention (Test 2) to evaluate overall impact. These were complemented by semi-structured surveys and interviews to assess students’ academic performance, conceptual understanding, and active engagement in the lessons. Mixed-effects ANCOVA revealed a significant Group × Time interaction, F(1,188) = 9.93, p = .002, partial η² = .050, indicating that the experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvement than the control group. The large between-group effect size (partial η² = .231) confirms substantial practical significance of the AR intervention. Qualitative findings indicated that the use of AR enhanced students’ motivation, engagement, and conceptual understanding by enabling them to visualize three-dimensional molecular structures and conduct simulated experiments in a safe, controlled environment. Despite challenges such as limited technological infrastructure and the need for specialized teacher training, the study demonstrates that AR holds considerable potential for transforming chemistry education in Vietnam. These findings underscore the importance of continued research, targeted professional development, and supportive policies to optimize the integration of AR into diverse educational settings, ultimately improving students’ interest and learning outcomes.

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into the field of higher education is causing widespread public discourse. However, existing research is fragmented and lacks systematic synthesis, which limits understanding of how college and university students adopt artificial intelligence technologies. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review following the guidelines of the PRISMA statement, including studies from ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycARTICLES, SOC INDEX, and Embase databases. A total of 5594 articles were identified in the database search; 112 articles were included in the review. The criteria for inclusion in the review were: (i) publication date; (ii) language; (iii) participants; (iv) object of research. The results of the study showed: (a) The Technology Acceptance Model and the Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use are most often used to explain the AI acceptance; (b) quantitative research methods prevail; (c) AI is mainly used by students to search and process information; (d) technological factors are the most significant factors of AI acceptance; (e) gender, specialty, and country of residence influence the AI acceptance. Finally, several problems and opportunities for future research are highlighted, including problems of psychological well-being, students’ personal and academic development, and the importance of financial, educational, and social support for students in the context of widespread artificial intelligence.

This study examines the transformation of higher education through digital solutions, with a specific focus on developing a user-centered digital student handbook prototype for Surin Vocational College in Thailand, with potential scalability nationwide. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates qualitative and quantitative data to design a digital tool that enhances accessibility, usability, and personalization for students. The prototype features key components, including mobile accessibility, real-time updates, interactive notifications, and integration with academic tools, designed to enhance student engagement, career readiness, and academic performance. Data collection involved students, faculty, and experts to ensure a comprehensive understanding of user needs and preferences. The findings indicate that the digital format offers significant advantages over traditional paper-based handbooks, particularly in terms of accessibility, real-time content updates, personalized experiences, and environmental sustainability. However, variability in user feedback suggests areas for further refinement,  emphasizing that there must be continuous improvement. This research offers interesting perspectives on the role of digital solutions in higher education, contributing to the ongoing evolution of learning tools that support academic success, student engagement, and institutional sustainability.