logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
higher education online distance learning continuance preferences covid 19 outbreak

Changes in Online Distance Learning Behaviour of University Students during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak, and development of the Model of Forced Distance Online Learning Preferences

Mateja Ploj-Virtič , Kosta Dolenc , Andrej Šorgo

Because of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, most universities were forced to choose Online Distance Learning (ODL). The study aimed t.

B

Because of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, most universities were forced to choose Online Distance Learning (ODL). The study aimed to examine the response of university students to the new situation. A questionnaire was sent to the entire university student population. Based on responses from 606 students, it was revealed that use of all applications in ODL increased. However, only the use of MS Teams increased significantly, while the use of the other applications (email, Moodle, e-textbooks) increased in a range of low to medium in terms of effect sizes, and even nonsignificant for applications such as Padlet and Kahoot. Based on the replies of 414 respondents, a Model of Forced Distance Online Learning Preferences (MoFDOLP) based on Structural Equation Modeling was developed. With a chosen combination of predictors, we succeeded in predicting 95% of variance for Satisfaction, more than 50% for Continuance Preferences variance in MS Teams applications, and nearly 20% in the case of e-materials. Among hypothesized constructs, only Attitudes are a strong predictor of Satisfaction, while Organizational Support, Perceived Ease of Use and Learner Attitude toward Online Learning are not. Satisfaction is a good predictor of Continuance Preferences to use Information Technology after the lockdown ended.

Keywords: Higher education, online distance learning, continuance preferences, COVID-19, outbreak.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
1746
Download
1105
Citations
Crossref
25

Scopus
29

References

Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56(2016), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2015.11.036

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0749-5978%2891%2990020-t

Al-alak, B. A., & Alnawas, I. A. (2011). Measuring the acceptance and adoption of e-learning by academic staff. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(2), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2011.03.016

Almaghaslah, D., Ghazwani, M., Alsayari, A., & Khaled, A. (2018). Pharmacy students’ perceptions towards online learning in a Saudi Pharmacy School. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal26(5), 617-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2018.03.001

Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088

Arbaugh, J. B. (2002). Managing the on-line classroom: a study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(02)00049-4

Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses. Management Learning, 33(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.2002.7516897

Artino Jr., A. R. (2010). Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students' choice of instructional format. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 272-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.005

Bandyopadhyay, S., & Natarajan, V. (2011). Service quality of educational websites: An empirical study. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 6(6), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v6i6.2430

Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 659–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500702

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191

Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies2(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191

Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: Testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(03)00049-9

Benlian, A., Koufaris, M., & Hess, T. (2011). Service quality in software-as-a-service: Developing the saaS-qual measure and examining its role in usage continuance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 85-126. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222280303

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Bhuasiri, W. Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010

Blumenthal, S., & Blumenthal, Y. (2020). Tablet or paper and pen? Examining mode effects on German elementary school students’ computation skills with curriculum-based measurements. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(4), 669-680. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.4.669

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219

Carillo, K., Scornavacca, E., & Za, S. (2017). The role of media dependency in predicting continuance intention to use ubiquitous media systems. Information & Management, 54(3), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.09.002

Computer Center of University of Maribor. (2020). Computer Center of University of Maribor through time. https://it.um.si/rcum/Strani/RCUM-skozi-cas.aspx

Cheawjindakarn, B., Suwannatthachote, P., & Theeraroungchaisri, A. (2012). Critical success factors for online distance learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Creative Education, 3(8), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38b014

Chroustová, K., Bílek, M., & Šorgo, A. (2015). Development of the research tool to identify factors affecting the use of chemistry educational software. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 68(6), 6-21.

Corbeil, J. R., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. E., (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning?. Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 51-58.

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., & Glowatz, M. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

Debevc, M., Weiss, J., Šorgo, A., & Kožuh, I. (2020). Solfeggio learning and the influence of a mobile application based on visual, auditory and tactile modalities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12792

Deng, L., Turner, D. E., Gehling, R., & Prince, B. (2010). User experience, satisfaction, and continual usage intention of IT. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.50

Didakt.UM (2020). UM Teaching support center. https://didakt.um.si/center-za-podporo-poucevanju/predstavitev/Strani/default.aspx

Dolenc, K., Šorgo, A., & Ploj Virtič, M. (2021 ). Forced continuance intention model (FCIM) of distance online teaching in the time of the initial COVID-19 outbreak. Unpublished manuscript.

Fryer, L. K., & Bovee, H. N. (2016). Supporting students' motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. The Internet and Higher Education30, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003

Gattiker, U. E., & Hlavka, A. (1992). Computer attitudes and learning performance: Issues for management education and training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130109

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.

Hepp, P., Hinostroza, J. E., Laval, E., & Rehbein, L. (2004). Technology in schools: Education. ICT and the knowledge society. World Bank Education Advisory Service.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Ho, L.-A., & Kuo, T.-H. (2010). How can one amplify the effect of e-learning? An examination of high-tech employees’ computer attitude and flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.007

Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518115

Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498.

Julia, J., Afrianti, N., Soomro, K.A., Supriyadi, T., Dolifah, D., Isrokatun, I., Erhamwilda, E., & Ningrum, D. (2020). Flipped classroom educational model (2010-2019): A bibliometric study. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1377-1392. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1377

Kline, R. B. (1998). Structural equation modeling. Guilford.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. AACTE committee on innovation and technology. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koeler & P. Mishra (Eds.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). Taylor & Francis Group.

Krishnan, S. (2018). Students’ perceptions of learning mode in mathematics. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences4(2), 32-41.

Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002

Liao, C., Palvia, P. C., & Chen, J. (2009). Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a technology continuance theory (TCT). International Journal of Information Management, 29(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.004

Liaw, S. S., Huang, H.M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1906–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.002

Limayem, M., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2008). Understanding information systems continuance: The case of internet-based learning technologies. Information & Management, 45(4), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.005

Lu, J., Yao, J., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness. Social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

Nijs, L., & Leman, M. (2014). Interactive technologies in the instrumental music classroom: A longitudinal study with the music paint machine. Computers & Education, 73, 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.008

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499

Otter, R. R., Seipel, S., Graeff, T., Alexander, B., Boraiko, C., Gray, J., Petersen, K., & Sadler, K. (2013). Comparing student and faculty perceptions of online and traditional courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.08.001

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.

Parkes, M., Stein, S., & Reading, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education25, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002

Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250989

Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003

Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow. Information & Management, 53(4), 504-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.11.005

Rogers. E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. social development. and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Schwarz, A., Rizzuto, T., Carraher-Wolverton, C., Roldán, J. L., & Barrera-Barrera, R. (2017). Examining the impact and detection of the" urban legend" of common method bias. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems48(1), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.1145/3051473.3051479

Soh, O. K., Lim, L. A. D., Yee, L. Y., Ying, L. K., & Yin, L. L. (2018). A Review on the students’ perceptions of online learning tools in improving english writing skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development7(4), 324-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i4/4979

Suartama, I. K., Triwahyuni, E., Abbas, S., Hastuti, W. D., Usman, M., Subiyantoro, S., & Salehudin, M. (2020). Development of e-learning oriented inquiry learning based on character education in multimedia course. European Journal of Educational Research9(4), 1591-1603. http://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1591

Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Šumak, B., Polančič, G., & Heričko, M. (2010). An empirical study of virtual learning environment adoption using UTAUT. In A.M. Gadomski, B. Krämer, C.Y. Lester, & M. Popescu (Eds.), 2010 Second international conference on mobile, hybrid, and on-line learning (pp. 17-22). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/elml.2010.11

Šumak, B., Heričko, M., Pušnik, M., & Polančič, G. (2011). Factors affecting acceptance and use of Moodle: An empirical study based on TAM. Informatica, 35(1), 91-100.

Šumak, B., & Šorgo, A. (2016). The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers: Differences in UTAUT determinants between pre-and post-adopters. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 602-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037

Šumak, B., Pušnik, M., Heričko, M., & Šorgo, A. (2017). Differences between prospective, existing, and former users of interactive whiteboards on external factors affecting their adoption, usage and abandonment. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 733-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.006

Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067-2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal Computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/249443

Thong, J. Y., Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine Context. Pedagogical Research5(4), em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947

University of Maribor (2020). Annual program of University of Maribor. University of Maribor. https://cutt.ly/OjjP8Dv

Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., & Riempp, G. (2010). An empirical investigation of employee portal success. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 184–206. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.06.002

Usak, M., Masalimova, A. R., Cherdymova, E. I., & Shaidullina, A. R. (2020). New playmaker in science education: COVID-19. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.180

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Witze, A. (2020). Universities will never be the same after the coronavirus crisis. Nature, 582(7811), 162-164. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01518-y

Wu. B., & Zhang, C. (2014). Empirical study on continuance intentions towards e-learning 2.0 systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1027-1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2014.934291

Zhou, Z., Fang, Y., Vogel, D. R.., Jin, X.-L., & Zhang, X. (2012). Attracted to or locked in? Predicting continuance intention in social virtual world services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(1), 273–306. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222290108

...