Research Article
Development of Affective Self-Assessment Instrument of Chemistry for High School Student as the Daily Assessment Guideline

Farintis Jihadul Alivi, Widihastuti

398 363

Article Metrics

Views

 

398

Downloads

 

363

Citations

Crossref

0

Scopus

0


Alivi FJ, Widihastuti. Development of affective self-assessment instrument of chemistry for high school student as the daily assessment guideline. European J Ed Res. 2022;11(1):445-456. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.445
Alivi, F. J., & Widihastuti. (2022). Development of affective self-assessment instrument of chemistry for high school student as the daily assessment guideline. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.445
Alivi Farintis Jihadul, and Widihastuti. "Development of Affective Self-Assessment Instrument of Chemistry for High School Student as the Daily Assessment Guideline," European Journal of Educational Research 11, no. 1 (2022): 445-456. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.445
Alivi, FJ & Widihastuti, 2022, 'Development of affective self-assessment instrument of chemistry for high school student as the daily assessment guideline', European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 445-456. Alivi, Farintis Jihadul, and Widihastuti. "Development of Affective Self-Assessment Instrument of Chemistry for High School Student as the Daily Assessment Guideline." European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, pp. 445-456, https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.445.

Abstract

The study objectives were (1) developing a valid and reliable Affective Self-assessment Instrument of Chemistry for High School Student and (2) discovering the chemistry affective domain ability trend of high school students based on gender. The current development study utilized 10 non-test instrument development procedures from Mardapi. The study population was all high school students in Yogyakarta Special Region. The sample size was 405 students categorized into two stages and sampling techniques, i.e., the trial stage using cluster random sampling and the measurement stage using simple random sampling. The data analysis techniques were validity test using the Aiken index and construct validity and reliability using the second-order Confirmatory Factor Analysis model. The study findings were (1) the Affective Self-assessment Instrument of Chemistry for High School Student had 15 valid and reliable items and 15 available items to be utilized by teachers to measure students’ affective in the learning process and (2) the chemistry affective domain ability trend of male high school students was dominated by the “good” category and “very good” category for female students.

Keywords: Affective domain, reliability, validity.


References

Abadi, T. W. (2016). Aksiologi: Antara etika, moral, dan estetika [Axiology: Between ethics, morals, and aesthetics]. Kanal: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(2), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.21070/kanal.v4i2.1452  

Adenzato, M., Brambilla, M., Manenti, R., De Lucia, L., Trojano, L., Garofalo, S., Enrici, I., & Cotelli, M. (2017). Gender differences in cognitive Theory of Mind revealed by transcranial direct current stimulation on medial prefrontal cortex. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41219  

Aiken, L. R. (1980). Attitude measurement and research. New directions for testing and measurement, 7, 1-24.

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

A’izzah, A. A., Susialaningsih, E., & Sumarti, S. S. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian (attitude toward chemistry) dengan teknik peer dan self assessment siswa SMA N 2 Salatiga [Development of assessment instruments (attitude toward chemistry) with peer techniques and self-assessment for students of SMA N 2 Salatiga]. Chemistry in Education, 6(2), 29-34. https://bit.ly/3lkg0xs

Akbarini, N. R., Murtini, W., & Rahmanto, A. N. (2018). The effect of Lectora inspire-based interactive learning media in vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v8i1.17970

Andersen, E. B. (1980). Discrete statistical models with social science applications (No. 04; HA29, A53.). North Holland Publishing Company.

Andersen, S. M. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.294

Anderson, L. W., & Bourke, S. F. (2013). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605443 

Ayub, A. F. M., Yunus, A. S. M., Mahmud, R., Salim, N. R., & Sulaiman, T. (2017). Differences in students’ mathematics engagement between gender and between rural and urban schools. AIP Conference Proceedings 1795, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972169

Azwar, S. (2018). Reliabilitas dan validitas [Reliability and validity]. Pustaka Pelajar.

Beltrán-Pellicer, P., & Godino, J. D. (2020). An onto-semiotic approach to the analysis of the affective domain in mathematics education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1623175

Bhardwaj, A. (2016). Importance of education in human life: A holistic approach. International Journal of Science and Consciousness, 2(2), 23-28. https://bit.ly/3rstOcQ

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Handbook I: cognitive domain. David McKay.

Chen, A., & Wang, Y. (2017). The role of interest in physical education: A review of research evidence. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(3), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0033

Cimpian, J. R., Lubienski, S. T., Timmer, J. D., Makowski, M. B., & Miller, E. K. (2016). Have gender gaps in math closed? Achievement, teacher perceptions, and learning behaviors across two ECLS-K cohorts. AERA Open, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673617

Delacre, M., Leys, C., Mora, Y. L., & Lakens, D. (2019). Taking parametric assumptions seriously: Arguments for the use of Welch’s F-test instead of the classical F-test in one-way ANOVA. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 1-12. http://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.198

Dewi, I. P. M., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Wilujeng, I., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2017). The effect of science learning integrated with local potential of wood carving and pottery towards the junior high school students' critical thinking skills. Journal of Indonesia Science Education/ Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9598

Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524

Fitts, W. H., & Roid, G. H. (1964). Tennessee self concept scale. Counselor Recordings and Tests.

Ghadi, I., Alwi, N. H., Bakar, K. A., & Talib, O. (2012). Construct validity examination of critical thinking dispositions for undergraduate students in University Putra Malaysia. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 138-145. https://.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p138  

Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220-227.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216655542

Harlen, W. (1985). Teaching and learning primary science. Teachers College Press.

Hart, L. E. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams. Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving (pp. 37-45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3614-6_3

Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238

Herman-Giddens, M. (2006). Recent data on pubertal milestones in United States children: the secular trend toward earlier development. International Journal of Andrology, 29, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00575.x

Hidayati, H. N., Hayat, B., & Rahayu, W. (2021). Assessment of the validity and reliability of mental health instruments of high school student in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 729-742. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.729

Hosseini, S. N., Alavijeh, M. M., Matin, B. K., Hamzeh, B., Ashtarian, H., & Jalilian, F. (2016). Locus of control or self-esteem; Which one is the best predictor of academic achievement in Iranian college students. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17795/ijpbs-2602

Hudi, I. (2017). Pengaruh pengetahuan moral terhadap perilaku moral pada siswa SMP Negeri Kota Pekan Baru berdasarkan pendidikan orangtua [The influence of moral knowledge on moral behavior in public junior high school students in pekanbaru city based on parents' education]. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 2(1), 30-44. https://bit.ly/3EOmb4s

Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Setiawan, R., & Megawati, I. (2020). Developing of computerized adaptive testing to measure physics higher order thinking skills of senior high school students and its feasibility of use. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.91

Kavousi, E., Khazaei, Z., Amini, A., Fattahi, E., Panahi, A., Sohrabivafa, M., Beiranvand, R., & Goodarzi, E. (2017). Promoting behaviors of healthiness in two domains of physical activity and nutrition statue in high school students. International Journal of Pediatrics, 5(5), 4839-4847. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijp.2017.21416.1797

Kokom, K., & Edwina, T. N. (2020). Relationship between social support families with meaningfulness of life in the elderly in rural Kebandungan. Jurnal Psikologi Talenta, 5(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.26858/talenta.v5i2.9859

Kusumaningtyas, P., Yusvitasari, R. E., & Majid, A. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kinerja untuk mengukur kompetensi siswa dalam kegiatan praktikum kimia di SMA/K [Development of performance assessment instruments to measure student competence in chemistry practicum activities at SMA/K]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(2), 2128-2136.

Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational research methods, 9(2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919

Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936-949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

Lilleholt, L. (2019). Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(3), 234-279.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes [Techniques for preparing test and non-test instruments]. Mitra Cendekia.

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan [Measurement, assessment and evaluation of education]. Parama Publishing.

Mardapi, D. (2018). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes [Techniques for preparing test and non-test instruments]. Parama Publishing.

Marshman, E., Kalender, Z. Y., Schunn, C., Nokes-Malach, T., & Singh, C. (2018). A longitudinal analysis of students’ motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences. Canadian Journal of Physics, 96(4), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2017-0185

Mulyono, D., Asmawi, M., & Nuriah, T. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching, student facilitator and explaining and learning independence on mathematical learning results by controlling the initial ability of students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 199-205. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3838

Muslich, K. M. (2014). Pengembangan model assessment afektif berbasis self assessment dan peer assessment di SMA Negeri 1 [Development of the self-assessment and peer assessment based affective assessment model at SMA Negeri 1]. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 2(2), 143-148. https://bit.ly/3xH3mxu

Ramma, Y., Bholoa, A., Watts, M., & Nadal, P. S. (2018). Teaching and learning physics using technology: Making a case for the affective domain. Education Inquiry, 9(2), 210-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1343606

Riscaputantri, A., & Wening, S. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian afektif siswa kelas IV sekolah dasar di Kabupaten Klaten [Development of affective assessment instruments for fourth grade elementary school students in Klaten District]. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.16885

Rojo Robas, V., Villarroel Villamor, J. D., & Madariaga Orbea, J. M. (2018). The affective domain in learning mathematics according to students’ gender. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educative, 21(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.18.2123

Rosa, F. O. (2015). Analisis kemampuan siswa kelas X pada ranah kognitif, afektif dan psikomotorik [Analysis of the ability of class X students in the cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains]. Omega: Jurnal Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 24-28.

Sari, V. T. A., & Hidayat, W. (2019). The students’ mathematical critical and creative thinking ability in double-loop problem solving learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012024

Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. (2014). A concise guide to market research. The Process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53965-7

Saxon, D. P., Levine-Brown, P., & Boylan, H. R. (2008). Affective assessment for developmental students, part 1. Research in Developmental Education, 22(1), 1-4. https://bit.ly/3I9lkgJ

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013 [Implementation of the assessment in the 2013 Curriculum]. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan /Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(2), 166-178. https://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173  

Setiawan, A., & Mardapi, D. (2019). The development of instrument for assessing students' affective domain using self-and peer-assessment models. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 425-438.  https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12326a

Setiawan, D. A., VH, E. S., & Mulyani, S. (2013). Prestasi belajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe numbered heads together (NHT) lebih tinggi dari pada think-pair-share (TPS) pada materi pelajaran tata nama senyawa kimia dan persamaan reaksi kimia [Learning achievement with cooperative learning type numbered heads together (NHT) is higher than think-pair-share (TPS) in the subject matter of chemical compound nomenclature and chemical reaction equations]. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, (4), 11-18. https://bit.ly/3lheYlE  

Slameto. (2010). Belajar & Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi [Learning & Influencing Factors]. Rineka Cipta.

Suranto, S., Muhyadi, M., & Mardapi, D. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi uji kompetensi keahlian (UKK) administrasi perkantoran di SMK [Development of an evaluation instrument for the skill competency test (UKK) for office administration in SMK]. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2127

Syamsudin, A., Budiyono, B., & Sutrisno, S. (2016). Model of affective assessment of primary school students. REiD Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8307

Tyler, R. W. (1973). Assessing educational achievement in the affective domain. NCME Measurement in Education, 4, 1-8. https://bit.ly/3rjFzT1

Wan, Z. H., & Lee, J. C. K. (2017). Hong Kong secondary school students’ attitudes towards science: A study of structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 507-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1292015

Wiwin, E., & Kustijono, R. (2018, March). The use of physics practicum to train science process skills and its effect on scientific attitude of vocational high school students. Journal of Physics, 997(1), 12040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012040

Wong, T. T. (2015). Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern Recognition, 48(9), 2839-2846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2015.03.009