Research Article
Flexible Delivery Approach in Architecture and Construction Management Course

Eric Chan


APA 6th edition
Chan, E. (2013). Flexible Delivery Approach in Architecture and Construction Management Course. European Journal of Educational Research, 2(3), 139-149. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.2.3.139

Harvard
Chan E. 2013 'Flexible Delivery Approach in Architecture and Construction Management Course', European Journal of Educational Research , vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 139-149. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.2.3.139

Chicago 16th edition
Chan, Eric . "Flexible Delivery Approach in Architecture and Construction Management Course". (2013)European Journal of Educational Research 2, no. 3(2013): 139-149. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.2.3.139

Abstract

The millennial generation is facing challenges in their career path and they believe that tertiary education can help them to equip better to tackle against. However, some students find it difficult to rush back to classroom due to work commitment. Fortunately, flexible education developed these years allows students to capture knowledge anytime and anywhere easier. In order to deliver courses in line with students’ need, many universities have considered offering alternative studying modes, such as flexible method, to enrich the course delivery. Using a case study, this paper investigates the delivery approach adopted by a school of a well-known university in Australia. This School offers architecture and construction management courses and has successfully adopted the flexible approach, with the aid of various online teaching and learning tools: the Cloud, Elluminate Live!, EchoSystem, Mediawiki and ePortfolio, in delivering subjects. It is welcomed by various cohorts of students. Not only the student numbers have been increased, but the School is also the first preference when students opting architecture and construction management studies. Statistics also indicate students’ satisfaction and course experience are improved. The success of this School proves itself to be an exemplar for other educators planning for flexible delivery.

Keywords: Flexible teaching and learning, architecture and construction management education, Australian tertiary education


References

Bigum, C., & Rowan, L. (2004). Flexible learning in teacher education: Myths, muddles and models. Asia?Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 213-226.

Cavus, N., & Al-Momani, M. M. (2011). Mobile system for flexible education. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1475-1479.

Clarke, T., & Hermens, A. (2001). Corporate developments and strategic alliances in e-learning. Education+ Training, 43(4/5), 256-267.

Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2002). Flexible learning in a digital world. Open learning, 17(3), 217-230.

Collis, B., Moonen, J., & Vingerhoets, J. (1997). Flexibility as a key construct in European training: Experiences from the TeleScopia project. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(3), 199-217.

Collis, B., & Wende, M. (2002). Models of technology and change in higher education.

Eklund, J., Kay, M., & Lynch, H. M. (2003). E-learning: Emerging issues and key trends: A discussion paper.

Hoppe, H. (2003). A web-based tutoring tool with mining facilities to improve learning and teaching. Artificial intelligence in education: Shaping the future of learning through intelligent technologies, 97, 201.

King, B., & Kenworthy, B. (1999). Flexible approaches to a changing learning environment in Australia. Paper presented at the Workshop presented at the Pan Commonwealth Forum: Forum on Open Learning. Retrieved December.

Kirkpatrick, D. (2001). Staff development for flexible learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 168-176.

Marjanovic, O., & Orlowska, M. E. (2000). Making flexible learning more flexible. Paper presented at the Advanced Learning Technologies, 2000. IWALT 2000. Proceedings. International Workshop on.

Poon, J., Royston, P., & Fuchs, W. (2010). Examination of the critical factors for developing a successful blended learning teaching method for RICS and CIOB accredited courses. Paper presented at the Construction Building and Real Estate Research Conference, Paris, France.

Schellekens, A., Paas, F., Verbraeck, A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2010). Flexible programmes in higher professional education: expert validation of a flexible educational model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 283-294.

Sinha, A. K., & Chaudhary, B. D. (2004). An investigation of relationship between learning styles, methods of instruction and performance of learner. Paper presented at the Creating flexible learning environments: Proceedings of the 15 th Australasian Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education.

Svensson, L., Ellström, P.-E., & Åberg, C. (2004). Integrating formal and informal learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 479-491.

Syed Khuzzan, S. M., Goulding, J. S., & Underwood, J. (2008). Personalised learning environments: Core development issues for construction. Interactive educational multimedia: IEM(17), 48-67.

Tingerthal, J. S. (2011). Using Tablet PCs as a Teaching Tool in the Construction Management Classroom. Paper presented at the 47th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings, Omaha Nebraska U.S.A.

Tucker, R., & Morris, G. (2011). Anytime, anywhere, anyplace: articulating the meaning of flexible delivery in built environment education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 904-915.

Wyn, J. (2004). Becoming adult in the 2000s: new transitions and new careers. Family Matter, No.68(Winter), 6-22.