Aldridge, J. M., & Rowntree, K. (2021). Investigating relationships between learning environment perceptions, motivation and self-regulation for female science students in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Research in Science Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09998-2

Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Julius-McElvany, N., & Peschar, J. (2003). Learners for life: Student approaches to learning: Results from PISA 2000. OECD. https://bit.ly/3Ggee8l  

Bembenutty, H. (2007). Self-regulation of learning and academic delay of gratification: Gender and ethnic differences among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(4), 586-616. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-553

Brod, G. (2020). Generative learning: Which strategies for what age? Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09571-9

Cornford, I. R. (2002). Learning-to-learn strategies as a basis for effective lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(4), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370210141020

den Elzen-Rump, V., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2008). Lernstrategien im Unterrichtsalltag [Learning strategies in everyday teaching]. In S. Kliemann (Ed.), Schülergerechtes Arbeiten in der Sekundarstufe I: Diagnostizieren und Fördern [Student-centered work in secondary level I: Diagnosis and support] (pp. 101-113). Cornelsen-Scriptor.

Desch, I., Basten, M., Großmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2017). Geschlechterdifferenzen in der wahrgenommenen Erfüllung der Prozessmerkmale gemäßigt konstruktivistischer Lernumgebungen – Die Effekte von Autonomieförderung durch Schülerwahl [Gender differences in the perception of moderate constructivist learning environments – The effects of autonomy support by means of students’ choice]. Journal for Educational Research Online, 9(2), 156-182. https://bit.ly/3Gf7Nm8  

Dresel, M., Stöger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2004). Lernstrategiegebrauch in Abhängigkeit von Bildungsgängen und Jahrgangsstufen in der Sekundarstufe [The dependence of learning strategy use on academic program and grade levels at the secondary level] (Ulmer Forschungsberichte aus der Pädagogischen Psychologie, 11). Universität, Abt. Pädagogische Psychologie.

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 717-741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9

Frey, A., Taskinen, P., Schütte, K., Prenzel, M., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Hammann, M., Klieme, E., & Pekrun, R. (2009). PISA 2006 Skalenhandbuch. Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2006 scale manual. Documentation of the survey instruments]. Waxmann.

Großmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2020). Promoting interest by supporting learner autonomy: The effects of teaching behaviour in biology lessons. Research in Science Education, 50, 1763-1788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9752-5

Hammann, M. (2019). Organisationsebenen biologischer Systeme unterscheiden und vernetzen: Empirische Befunde und Empfehlungen für die Praxis [Distinguishing and networking organisational levels of biological systems: Empirical findings and recommendations for practice]. In J. Groß, M. Hammann, P. Schmiemann & J. Zabel (Eds.), Biologiedidaktische Forschung: Erträge für die Praxis [Biology-didactic research: Income for practice] (pp. 77-91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58443-9_5

Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2008). Geschlechtsunterschiede beim Lernen [Gender differences in learning]. In W. Schneider & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch der Pädagogischen Psychologie (Reihe Handbuch der Psychologie) [Handbook of pedagogical psychology] (pp. 116-125). Hogrefe.

Hariri, H., Karwan, D. H., Haenilah, E. Y., Rini, R., & Suparman, U. (2021). Motivation and learning strategies: Student motivation affects student learning strategies. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.39

Hidi, S. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002151

Isaak, R., Hüfner, C., Basten, M., & Wilde, M. (2020). Der Einfluss von Elaborationsstrategien auf die Lernleistung im Biologieunterricht unter Berücksichtigung unterschiedlicher kognitiver Anforderungsbereiche [The influence of elaboration strategies on learning performance in biology lessons regarding different cognitive achievement levels]. Psychology in Education and Teaching/ Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 67(2), 124-137. https://bit.ly/31yLdWH

Jördens, J., Asshoff, R., Kullmann, H., & Hammann, M. (2016). Providing vertical coherence in explanations and promoting reasoning across levels of biological organization when teaching evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 960-992. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1174790

Kattmann, U. (2016). Auswahl und Verknüpfung der Lerninhalte [Selection and linking of learning content]. In H. Gropengießer, U. Harms & U. Kattmann (Eds.), Fachdidaktik Biologie [Biology Didactics] (pp. 29-38). Aulis Verlag.

Kessels, U., Heyder, A., Latsch, M., & Hannover, B. (2014). How gender differences in academic engagement relate to students’ gender identity. Educational Research, 56(2), 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.898916

Krapp, A. (1992). Interesse, Lernen und Leistung. Neue Forschungsansätze in der Pädagogischen Psychologie [Interest, learning, and achievement. New empirical approaches in pedagogical psychology]. Journal of Pedagogy/ Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 38(5), 747-770. https://bit.ly/3mEyoBA

Krapp, A. (1999). Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Interesse. Forschungsansätze und konzeptuelle Überlegungen [Intrinsic motivation for learning and interest. Empirical approaches and conceptual considerations]. Journal of Pedagogy/ Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45(3), 387-406. https://bit.ly/31CCDG4

Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645

Kurman, J. (2004). Gender, self-enhancement, and self-regulation of learning behaviors in junior high school. Sex Roles, 50, 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000027573.36376.69

Lauermann, F., Meißner, A., & Steinmayr, R. (2019). Relative importance of intelligence and ability self-concept in predicting test performance and school grades in the math and language arts domains. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 364-383. http://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000377

Lehmann, M., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). The dynamics of free recall and their relation to rehearsal between 8 and 10 years of age. Child Development, 81(3), 1006-1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01448.x

Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 689-704. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014240

McWhaw, K., & Abrami, P. C. (2001). Student goal orientation and interest: Effects on students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1054

Ministry for Schools and Education of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (Ed.). (2019). Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe I Gymnasium in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Biologie [Core curriculum for the secondary school in North Rhine-Westphalia. Biology]. Ritterbach Verlag.

Moschner, B. (2010). Pädagogische Psychologie. Pädagogische Psychologie und Geschlechterforschung [Educational psychology. Educational psychology and gender studies]. In G. Steins (Ed.), Handbuch Psychologie und Geschlechterforschung [Handbook of psychology and gender studies] (pp. 175-188). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92180-8_10

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (volume 1: Analysis). National Bank of Belgium Museum. https://bit.ly/3Fwwydt  

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015. (volume I): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://bit.ly/318IFPa

Parker, J. M., Anderson, C. W., Heidemann, M., Merrill, J., Merritt, B., Richmond, G., & Urban-Lurain, M. (2012). Exploring undergraduates’ understanding of photosynthesis using diagnostic question clusters. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0054

Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males’ and females’ self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(00)80003-5

Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4

Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.41

Pribadi, B. A., & Susilana, R. (2021). The use of mind mapping approach to facilitate students’ distance learning in writing modular based on printed learning materials. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 907-917. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.907

Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2012). Mädchen und Frauen in MINT: Ein Überblick [Girls and women in STEM: An overview]. In M. Heilemann, H. Stöger & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Mädchen und Frauen in MINT – Bedingungen von Geschlechtsunterschieden und Interventionsmöglichkeiten [Girls and women in STEM - Conditions of gender differences and intervention options] (pp. 13-40). LIT.

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771045

Roelle, J., Nowitzki, C., & Berthold, K. (2017). Do cognitive and metacognitive processes set the stage for each other? Learning and Instruction, 50, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.009

Rogiers, A., Merchie, E., & Van Keer, H. (2020). What they say is what they do? Comparing task-specific self-reports, think-aloud protocols, and study traces for measuring secondary school students’ text-learning strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35, 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00429-5

Rozendaal, J. S., Minnaert, A., & Boekaerts, M. (2003). Motivation and self-regulated learning in secondary vocational education: Information-processing type and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(4), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(03)00016-5

Ruffing, S., Wach, F.-S., Spinath, F. M., Brünken, R., & Karbach, J. (2015). Learning strategies and general cognitive ability as predictors of gender-specific academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01238

Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136

Schiepe-Tiska, A., Rönnebeck, S., Schöps, K., Neumann, K., Schmidtner, S., Parchmann, I., & Prenzel, M. (2016). Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenz in PISA 2015 - Ergebnisse des internationalen Vergleichs mit einem modifizierten Testansatz [Scientific competence in PISA 2015 - Results of international comparison with a modified test approach]. In K. Reiss, C. Sälzer, A. Schiepe-Tiska, E. Klieme & O. Köller (Eds.), PISA 2015. Eine Studie zwischen Kontinuität und Innovation [PISA 2015. A study between continuity and innovation] (pp. 45-98). Waxmann.

Schroeders, U., Penk, C., Jansen, M., & Pant, H. A. (2013). Geschlechtsbezogene Disparitäten [Gender-related disparities]. In H. A. Pant, P. Stanat, U. Schroeders, A. Roppelt, T. Siegle & C. Pöhlmann (Eds.), IQB-Ländervergleich 2012: Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen am Ende der Sekundarstufe I [IQB country comparison 2012: Mathematical and scientific competencies at the end of lower secondary level] (pp. 249-274). Waxmann.

Schweder, S., & Raufelder, D. (2021). Interest, flow and learning strategies how the learning context affects the moderating function of flow. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(2), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1887066

Secretariat of the Standing Conference of Education Ministers of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany. (2005). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Beschluss vom 16.12.2004 [Educational standards in biology for the secondary school leaving certificate. Decision of December 16, 2004]. Luchterhand.

Shen, K. M., Li, T. L., & Lee, M. H. (2018). Learning biology as ‘Increase ones’ knowledge and understanding’: Studying Taiwanese high school students’ learning strategies in relation to their epistemic views and conceptions of learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2137-2157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1522013 

Soric, I., & Palekcic, M. (2009). The role of students’ interests in self-regulated learning: The relationship between students’ interests, learning strategies and causal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(4), 545-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178767

Souvignier, E., & Gold, A. (2004). Lernstrategien und Lernerfolg bei einfachen und komplexen Leistungsanforderungen [Learning strategies and learning achievement in simple and complex approaches of learning]. Psychology in Education and Teaching/ Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 51, 309-318. https://bit.ly/32EuFwO

Stokhof, H., de Vries, B., Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2020). Using mind maps to make student questioning effective: Learning outcomes of a principle-based scenario for teacher guidance. Research in Science Education, 50, 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9686-3

Tulis, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2013). Students’ motivational and emotional experiences and their relationship to persistence during academic challenge in mathematics and reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.06.003

Wagner, P., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2008). Time students spend working at home for school. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.002

Waldeyer, J., Fleischer, J., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2019). Validating the resource-management inventory (ReMI): Testing measurement invariance and predicting academic achievement in a sample of first-year university students. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000557

Walkington, C. A., & Bernacki, M. L. (2014). Motivating students by “personalizing” learning around individual interests: A consideration of theory, design, and implementation issues. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 18, 139-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320140000018004 

Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). Macmillan. 

Ziegler, A., & Dresel, M. (2006). Lernstrategien: Die Genderproblematik [Learning strategies: The gender problem]. In H. Mandl & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Handbuch Lernstrategien [Handbook of learning strategies] (pp. 378-389). Hogrefe.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51