Investigating the Development of Pre-Service Teachers’ Problem-Solving Strategies via Problem-Solving Mathematics Classes
This study investigated the development of problem-solving strategies demonstrated by 42 elementary pre-service mathematics teachers in problem-solvin.
- Pub. date: January 15, 2020
- Pages: 129-141
- 1602 Downloads
- 1191 Views
- 12 Citations
This study investigated the development of problem-solving strategies demonstrated by 42 elementary pre-service mathematics teachers in problem-solving mathematics classes. The study used a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative research by analyzing the collected data.. The quantitative portion calculates the frequencies and percentage of the participants’ responses to the problems posed in three different phases of the intervention: before, during, and after receiving the mathematics lessons. The qualitative approach was used for in-depth investigation to describe various mathematical problem-solving strategies demonstrated by participants across the three different research phases. Findings of the study indicated a limited number of problem-solving strategies present during the first phase of research such as “use arithmetic operation strategy,” and “make a drawing strategy,”. During the implementation of the problem-solving lessons and classroom discussion, the participants began to develop more strategies such as “use logical reasoning,” “solve a simpler problem,” “guess and check,” “organize data in a table or a list,” “look for a pattern,” “work backwards,” and “solve an equation,”. However, the research findings nonetheless revealed participants’ weakness in applying the variety of skills required for success in problem solving, such as interpreting information, mathematical working, and logical thinking. Results also demonstrated a limited and incorrect use of mathematical terminology, as well as a lack of problem comprehension. The discussion of the study addresses different features and issues related to mathematical problem-solving strategies. In light of its findings, this study presents recommendations and suggestions for the future development of pre-service teachers’ problem-solving strategies.
Keywords: Mathematics problem solving, problem-solving strategies, pre-service mathematics teachers, development of problem-solving strategies.
References
Al-Balasi, R. I., & Barham, A. I. (2010). The effect of using multiple mathematical representations on the attainment of mathematical concepts among basic eighth grade students and their ability to solve verbal problems. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 37(1), 1–13.
Almeida, R., & Bruno, A. (2014). Strategies of pre-service primary school teachers for solving addition problems with negative numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 719–737.
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). Australian curriculum: Senior secondary mathematics, general mathematics (rationale/aims). Retrieved on April 27, 2016 from http://australiancurriculum.org/seniorsecondary/mathematics/generalmathematics/rationaleaims
Ben-Peretz, M. (1995). Curriculum of teacher education program. In L. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 543–547). London, UK: Pergamon Press.
Bruun, F. (2013). Elementary teachers’ perspectives of mathematics problem solving strategies. The Mathematics Educator, 23(1), 45–59.
Charles, R., & Lester, F. (1984). Teaching problem solving. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Chunlian, J., Stephen, H., & Jinfa, C. (2014). Chinese and Singaporean sixth-grade students' strategies for solving problems about speed. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 27–50.
Cobb, V. (1999). An international comparison of teacher education. ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of enquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools. London, UK: HMSO.
Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). The common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
Council of Chief State School Initiatives (CCSSI). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Evans, B. R. (2014). Editor’s perspective article: Mathematics and science teaching for new alternative certificate teachers. JNAAC, 9(2), 44–48.
Fang, Q. (2012). A study on high school mathematics teachers’ mathematics professional literacy: What does high quality mathematics teaching need? Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 136–158.
Gok, T., & Silay, I. (2010). The effects of problem solving strategies on students’ achievement, attitude and motivation. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 7–21.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990) Using cooperative learning in math. In N. Davidson (Ed.), Cooperative Learning in Mathematics: A Handbook for Teachers (pp. 23–37). Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Knight, S. L., Wiseman, D. L., & Cooner, D. (2000). Using collaborative teacher research to determine the impact of professional development school activities on elementary students’ math and writing outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 26–38.
Lester, Jr., F. K. (1980). Problem solving: Is it a problem?. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Selected issues in mathematics education (pp. 286–323). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Co.
Margaret, C. M., Song, A. A., Tingting, M., Fabiola, R. A., & Adam, H. (2012). An investigation of preservice teachers' use of guess and check in solving a semi open-ended mathematics problem. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 105–116.
Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel arastirma [Qualitative research] (S. Turan, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel Akademi Publishing.
Munroe, L. (2015). The open-ended approach framework. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 97-104. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.4.3.97
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2012). What makes a teacher effective? Retrieved March 26, 2015 from: http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=JFRrmWqa1jU%3d&tabid=361
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Authors.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Orton, A. (1992). Learning mathematics: Issues, theory and classroom practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Cassell.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Posamentier, A. S., & Krulik, S. (1998). Problem solving strategies for efficient and elegant solutions: A resource for the mathematics teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.
Ramnarain, U. (2014). Empowering educationally disadvantaged mathematics students through a strategies-based problem solving approach. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(1), 43–57.
Runesson, U. (1997). Learning by exploration in mathematics courses: A program for student teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 20(2), 161–169.
Tekin Sitrava, R. (2018). Prospective mathematics teachers’ knowledge of basic algorithms. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 513-528. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.513
Van de Walle, J. A. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris, France: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Yew, W. T., & Zamri, S. N. (2016). Problem solving strategies of selected pre-service secondary school mathematics teachers in Malaysia. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 17–31.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.